The growth of party and candidate activity on the World Wide Web over the past 5 years has provoked much comment and criticism. Although initially most assessments were descriptive and anecdotal, more recent studies have taken a more systematic and quantitative approach to this topic. This article builds on the existing literature by developing a coding scheme that addresses two basic questions applicable to all political Web sites: (a) what the purpose of the sites are, and (b) how effectively they deliver their contents. In doing so, this article attempts to standardize the study of party Web sites and to promote the growth of cross-national and longitudinal comparative research in this area.
Abramson, J. B., Arterton, C., & Orren, G. R. (1988). The electronic commonwealth: The impact of new media technologies on democratic politics. New York: Basic Books.
2.
Aldridge, A., Forcht, K., & Pierson, J. (1997). Get linked or get lost: Marketing strategy for the Internet. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 7(3), 161-169.
3.
Auty, C., & Nicholas, D. (1998). British political parties and their Web pages. Aslib Proceedings, 50(10), 283-296.
4.
Bauer, C., & Scharl, A. (2000). Quantitative evaluation of Web site content and structure. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 10(1), 31-43.
5.
Belfield, R. (1997, March 21). Interaction packed schedules. New Statesman, pp. 26-27.
6.
Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
7.
Birdsell, D. S., & Muzzio, D. (1997, October). Political uses of the World Wide Web in the 1996 US presidential campaign. Paper presented at the History and Development of Political Communication on Television, International Conference, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
8.
Britain on-line for first election on the Internet. (1997, January 25). The Independent, p. 9.
9.
Budge, I., & Keman, H. (1990). Parties and democracy: Coalition formation and government functioning in twenty states. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.
Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Carlson, T., & Djupsund, G. (1999, August). Old wine in new bottles? Candidates on the Internet in the 1999 Finnish parliamentary election campaign. Paper presented at the XIV Nordic Conference of Mass Communication Research, Kungälv, Sweden.
12.
Cohen, L. B., & Still, J. M. (1999). A comparison of research university and two-year college library Web sites: Content, functionality, and form. College and Research Libraries, 60(3), 275-289.
13.
Everhart, N. (1997). Web page evaluation: Views from the field. Technology Connection, 4(3), 24-26.
14.
Everhart, N. (1998). Web page evaluation worksheet. Teacher Librarian, 25(5), 22.
15.
Faucheux, R. (1998, September). How campaigns are using the internet: An exclusive nationwide survey. Campaigns & Elections, pp. 22-25.
16.
Frisk, A. (1999). Virtual campaigning: The use of the Internet by (s) and (kd) in the 1998 elections to the Swedish Parliament [Online]. Independent Research Paper, Part 1 B. Available: http://www.algonet.se/%7Eafrisk/internet/index.html
17.
Gibson, R., Newell, J., & Ward, S. (in press). New media, new parties: Italian parties and the WWW. Southern European Society and Politics.
18.
Gibson, R., & Ward, S. (1998). UK political parties and the Internet: Politics as usual in the new media?Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 3(3), 14-38.
19.
Gibson, R., & Ward, S. (2000). New media, same impact? British party activity in cyberspace. In R. Gibson & S. Ward (Eds.), Reinvigorating government? British politics and the Internet (pp. 107-128). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
20.
Gillani, B. (1998). The Web as a delivery mechanism to enhance instruction. Educational Media International, 35(3), 197-202.
21.
Harmel, R., & Janda, K. (1994). An integrated theory of party goals and party change. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(3), 259-287.
22.
Herbig, P., & Hale, B. (1997). Internet: the marketing challenge of the twentieth century. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 7(2), 95-100.
23.
Hill, K., & Hughes, J. (1998). Cyber politics: Citizen activism in the age of the Internet. Oxford, UK: Rowman and Littlefield.
24.
Hoffman, D. L., Novak, T. P., & Chatterjee, P. (1997). Commercial scenarios for the Web: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Computer-Mediate Communication [Online], 1(3). Available: http://www.ascusc.org/jcm/vol1/issue3/
25.
Holmes-Smith, P. (2000). Introduction to structural equation modeling using AMOS 4.0 & LISREL 8.30. ACSPRI 2000 Summer Program. Elsternwick, Australia: School Research, Evaluation and Measurement Services.
26.
Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27.
Jenkins, M. (1997, March 25). The wired election. The Independent, pp. 2-3.
28.
Kamarck, E. C. (1999). Campaigning on the Internet in the elections of 1998. In E. C. Kamarck & J. Nye (Eds.), Democracy. com? Governance in a networked world. Hollis, NH: Hollis.
29.
Katz, R., & Mair, P. (1994). Party organisations: A Data Handbook. London: Sage.
30.
Katz, R., & Mair, P. (1995). Changing models of party organisation and party democracy: The emergence of the Cartel party. Party Politics, 1(1), 5-28.
31.
Klinenberg, E., & Perrin, A. (1996). Symbolic politics in the information age: The 1996 presidential campaigns on the Web [Online]. Available: http://demog.berkeley.edu/%7Eaperrin/infosociety.html
32.
Klotz, R. (1997). Positive spin: Senate campaigning on the Web. PS: Political Science and Politics, XXX(3), 482-486.
33.
Knupfer, N. N. (1997). Visual aesthetics and functionality of Web pages: Where is the design? In Proceedings of selected research and development presentations at the 1997 national convention of the association for educational communications and technology. Albuquerque, NM.
34.
Li, X. (1998). Web page design and graphic use of three U.S. newspapers. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 75(2), 353-365.
35.
Lucardie, P., & Rihoux, B. (1998). Between amateur activist party and professional electoral machine? Preliminary observations on the organisation of Green parties in Western Europe. Unpublished manuscript.
36.
Maddux, C. D. (1998). The World Wide Web: Some simple solutions to common design problems. Educational Technology, 38(5), 24-28.
37.
Maisel, L. S. (Ed.). (1998). The parties respond: Changes in American parties and campaigns. Boulder, CO: Westview.
38.
Margolis, M., Resnick, D., & Tu, C.-C. (1997). Campaigning on the Internet: Parties and candidates on the World Wide Web in the 1996 primary season. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 2(1), 59-78.
39.
Margolis, M., Resnick, D., & Wolfe, J. (1999). Party competition on the Internet: Minor versus major parties in the UK and USA. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 4(4), 24-47.
40.
Maule, R. W. (1998). Content design frameworks for Internet studies curricula and research. Internet Resarch: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 8(2), 174-184.
41.
McDonald, M. (1999). Extending persuasive techniques of low credibility sources to the World Wide Web. In D. W. Schumann & E. Thorson (Eds.), Advertising and consumer psychology (pp. ?). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
McMurdo, G. (1998). Evaluating Web information and design. Journal of Information Science, 24(3), 192-204.
43.
Nielson, J. (1997, March). The need for speed [Online]. Available: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9703a.html.
44.
Nixon, P., & Johansson, H. (1999). Transparency through technology: The Internet and political parties. In B. Hague & B. Loader (Eds.), Digital democracy: Discourse and democracy in the information age. London: Routledge.
45.
Norris, P. (1998). Who surfs? New technology, old voters and virtual democracy in America. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the John F. Kennedy Visions of Governance for the Twenty-First Century, Bretton Woods, NH [Online]. Available: http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/people/pnorris/bretton98.htm
46.
Norris, P. (1999, September). Who surfs Café Europa? Virtual democracy in the US and Western Europe. Paper presented to the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA.
47.
Norris, P. (2000). The virtuous circle. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48.
Norris, P., Curtice, J., Sanders, D., Scammell, M., & Semetko, H. (1999). On message: Communicating the campaign. London: Sage.
49.
Panebianco, A. (1988). Political parties: Organisation and power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Pardun, C. J., & Lamb, L. (1999). Corporate Web sites in traditional print advertisements. Internet Research, 9(2), 93-99.
51.
Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York: Wiley.
52.
Reeves, T. C., & Dehoney, J. (1998). Cognitive and social functions of course Web sites. In H. Maurer & R. G. Olson (Eds.), Proceedings of WebNet World Conference 98—World Conference of the WWW, Internet & Intranet. Orlando, FL: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
53.
Rheingold, H. (1995). The virtual community: Finding connection in a computerized world. London: Minerva.
54.
Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. G. (1998). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55.
Rogers, E. M. (1986). Communication technology: The new media in society. London: Collier Macmillan.
56.
Roper, J. (1999). New Zealand political parties online: The World Wide Web as a tool for democratisation or political marketing. In C. Toulouse & T. Luke (Eds.), The politics of cyberspace (pp. 69-83). London: Routledge.
57.
Sadow, J. (1997, August). Utilization of the World Wide Web as a communicator of campaign information. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
58.
Stone, B. (1996, November). Politics ’96. Internet World, pp. 44-50.
59.
Strom, K. (1990). A behavioural theory of competitive political parties. American Journal of Political Science, 34(2), 565-598.
60.
van Dijk, J.A.G. M. (1999). The network society: Social aspects of new media. London: Sage.
61.
Voerman, G. (1998). Dutch Political Parties on the Internet. ECPR News, 10(1), 8-9.
62.
Ward, S., & Gibson, R. (1998). The first Internet election? UK political parties and campaigning in cyberspace. In I. Crewe, B. Gosschalk, & J. Bartle (Eds.), Political communications: Why Labour won the general election of 1997 (pp. 93-112). London: Frank Cass.
63.
Weare, C., Musso, J. A., & Hale, M. L. (1999, September). The political economy of electronic democratic forums: The design of Californian municipal Web sites. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. Atlanta, GA.
64.
Wring, D. (1996). Political marketing and party development in Britain. European Journal of Marketing, 30(10/11), 100-111.
