The practice of writing biographies for museum-collected instruments lies at the intersection of the history of scientific instrument and anthropological object biography studies. Current practitioners often downplay object agency, resulting in either impoverished instrument histories or human-centered narratives. Given that the concept of agency primarily focuses on the social significance of objects, often overlooking the functioning of typical technical objects such as scientific instruments, and considering that object biographies initially did not address the agency of objects but rather how objects acquire person-like individuality, this paper proposes a more instrument-centered narrative framework based on Gilbert Simondon's account of technical individuals. Within this genuine “instrument biography,” instruments, like and alongside humans, continually adapt to and shape their milieus according to their unique existential conditions, thereby actively instructing the development of scientific practices and material cultures.
Alberti, SamuelJMM (2005) Objects and the museum. Isis96(4): 559–571.
2.
Alberti, SamuelJMMBoyleAInglisJ, et al. (2024) The immaterial turn? How historians of science and technology use material culture. In: TimBElizabethHArnaudD, et al. (eds) In Understanding Use: Objects in Museums of Science and Technology. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, 210–226.
3.
AndersonKFrappierMNeswaldE, et al. (2013) Reading instruments: Objects, texts and museums. Science and Education22(5): 1167–1189.
4.
AppaduraiA (1986) Introduction: Commodities and the politics of value. In: AppaduraiA (ed) In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 3–63.
5.
BairdD (2004) Thing Knowledge: A Philosophy of Scientific Instruments. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
BarfordM (2017) D. 176: Sextants, numbers, and the hydrographic office of the admiralty. History of Science55(4): 431–456.
7.
BeltekiD (2019) Overseeing the Production of Space and Time: A History of the Airy Transit Circle. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Kent, Kent.
8.
BeltekiD (2020) A model instrument: the making and the unmaking of a model of the Airy Transit Circle. Science Museum Group Journal13.
9.
BennettJ (1986) The Mechanics’ philosophy and the mechanical philosophy. History of Science24(1): 1–28.
10.
BennettJ (1987) The Divided Circle: A History of Instruments for Astronomy, Navigation and Surveying. Oxford: Phaidon Press.
11.
BennettJ (1998) Practical geometry and operative knowledge. Configurations6(2): 195–222.
12.
BennettJ (2003) Knowing and doing in the sixteenth century: What were instruments for?The British Journal for the History of Science36(2): 129–150.
13.
BennettJ (2011) Early modern mathematical instruments. Isis102(4): 697–705.
14.
BiagioliM (2006a) From print to patents: Living on instruments in early modern Europe. History of Science44(2): 139–186.
15.
BiagioliM (2006b) Galileo’s instruments of credit: telescopes, images, secrecy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16.
BoerDHedwigBMolderT, et al. (2021) Understanding science-in-the-making by letting scientific instruments speak: From semiotics to postphenomenology. Social Studies of Science51(3): 392–413.
17.
BoyleA (2019) Stories and silences in modern physics collections: An object biography approach. Ph.D. Thesis. University College London, London.
18.
BurströmNM (2014) Things in the eye of the beholder: A humanistic perspective on archaeological object biographies. Norwegian Archaeological Review47(1): 65–82.
19.
ByrneSClarkeAHarrisonR, et al. (2011) Networks, agents and objects: Frameworks for unpacking museum collections. In: SarahBAnneCRodneyH, et al. (eds) Unpacking the Collection: Networks of Material and Social Agency in the Museum. New York: Springer, 3–26.
20.
ConnellyCChangH (2019) Galvanometers and the many lives of scientific instruments. In: Joshua NLibaTFrancesW (eds) The Whipple Museum of the History of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 159–186.
21.
CoupayeL (2020) ‘Things ain’t the same anymore’: Towards an anthropology of technical objects (or ‘when leroi-gourhan and simondon meet MCS’). In: TimothyCAntoniaWShireenW (eds) Lineages and Advancements in Material Culture Studies: Perspectives from UCL Anthropology. London and New York: Routledge, 46–60.
22.
CoupayeL (2025) Ontology in the making or ontogenesis? Yams and printers as autonomous objects and their milieus. In: LetessonQSimonLDriessenJ (eds) Ontologies in the Making: Anthropological and Archaeological Perspectives. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain, 95–113.
23.
DannehlK (2018) Object biographies: From production to consumption. In: HarveyK (ed) History and Material Culture: A Student’s Guide to Approaching Alternative Sources. New York: Routledge, 171–186.
24.
DantT (2001) Fruitbox/toolbox: Biography and objects. Auto/Biography9(1&2): 11–20.
25.
DastonL (2000) Introduction: The coming into being of scientific objects. In: DastonL (ed) Biographies of Scientific Objects. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1–14.
26.
DunnR (2009) The Telescope: A Short History. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
27.
ElliottFB (2021) Models in Motion: Engineering Models as Objects of Communication in the Industrial City, from the Workshop to the Museum. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Manchester, Manchester.
28.
FieldJV (1988) What is scientific about a scientific instrument?Nuncius/Istituto e Museo di Storia Della Scienza3(2): 3–26.
29.
FontijnD (2013) Cultural biographies and itineraries of things: Second thoughts. In: Peter HahnHWeissH (eds) Mobility, Meaning and Transformations of Things: Shifting Contexts of Material Culture Through Time and Space. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 183–196.
30.
GalisonP (1997) Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
GellA (1998) Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
GuchetX (2018) Toward an object-oriented philosophy of technology. In: LoeveSGuchetXVincentBB (eds) French Philosophy of Technology: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology. Vol. 29. Cham: Springer, 237–256.
33.
HankinsTLSilvermanRJ (1999) Instruments and the Imagination. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
34.
HendriksenMMVerwaalRE (2020) Boerhaave’s furnace: Exploring early modern chemistry through working models. Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte43(3): 385–411.
35.
HicksD (2020) The Brutish Museums: The Benin bronzes, colonial violence and cultural restitution. London: Pluto Press.
36.
HoskinsJ (1998) Biographical Objects: How Things Tell the Story of People’s Lives. London: Routledge.
37.
HoskinsJ (2006) Agency, biography and objects. Handbook of Material Culture1: 74–85.
38.
HumphriesCAaronCSmithT (2014) Talking objects: Towards a post-social research framework for exploring object narratives. Organization21(4): 477–494.
39.
IhdeD (1979) Technics and Praxis. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
40.
IhdeD (1991) Instrumental Realism: The Interface between Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Technology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
41.
JoyJ (2009) Reinvigorating object biography: Reproducing the drama of object lives. World Archaeology41(4): 540–556.
42.
KopytoffI (1986) The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as process. In: AppaduraiA (ed) In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 64–91.
43.
LatourBWoolgarS ([1979] 1986) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
44.
LourençoMCGessnerS (2014) Documenting collections: Cornerstones for more history of science in museums. Science and Education23(4): 727–745.
45.
MitchellJA (2024) Instrumentality: On Technical Objects and Orientations in the Later Middle Ages. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
46.
NyhartLK (2016) Historiography of the history of science. In: LightmanB (ed) A Companion to the History of Science. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 7–22.
47.
PantalonyD (2011) Biography of an artifact: The theratron junior and Canada’s atomic age. Scientia Canadensis34(1): 51–63.
48.
PickeringA (1995) The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
PinneyC (2005) Things happen: Or, from which moment does that object Come? In: MillerD (ed) Materiality. Durham: Duke University Press, 256–272.
50.
RitchieT (2019) Object Identity: Deconstructing the ‘Hartree Differential Analyser’ and Reconstructing a Meccano Analogue Computer. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Kent, Kent.
51.
RoseAL (2022) Built on shaky foundations? Rethinking the history of seismology in Britain through the collections of the Science Museum, 1876–1939. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Leeds, Leeds.
52.
SaundersNJ (1999) Biographies of brilliance: Pearls, transformations of matter and being, c. AD 1492. World Archaeology31(2): 243–257.
53.
SchafferS (1991) The pasteurization of France. Studies in History of Philosophy of Science: Part A22(1): 174–192.
54.
SchafferS (2011) Easily cracked: Scientific instruments in states of disrepair. Isis102(4): 706–717.
55.
SchefflerRW (2009) Interests and instrument: A micro-history of object Wh.3469 (X-ray powder diffraction camera, ca. 1940). Studies in History and Philosophy of Science40: 396–404.
56.
SchickJFM (2017) Theaters of individuation: Gilbert simondon and the interrelations of ethics, techniques, and ontology. Journal of Badiou Studies5: 53–84.
57.
SchickoreJ (2007) The Microscope and the Eye: A History of Reflections, 1740–1870. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58.
ShapinSSchafferS (1985) Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
59.
ShaylerDJHarlandDM (2016) The Hubble Space Telescope: From Concept to Success. New York: Springer.
60.
SibumHO (1995) Reworking the mechanical value of heat: Instruments of precision and gestures of accuracy in early victorian England. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science: Part A26(1): 73–106.
61.
SimondonG (2005) L’invention dans les techniques: Cours et conférences. Paris: rue Jacob.
62.
SimondonG ([1958] 2017) On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. (trans. C Malaspina and J Rogove). Minneapolis: Univocal Publishing.
63.
SmithRWTatarewiczJN (1994) Counting on invention: Devices and black boxes in very big science. Osiris9: 101–123.
64.
SteinerCB (2001) Rights of passage: On the liminal identity of art in the border zone. In: MyersFR (ed) The Empire of Things: Regimes of Value and Material Culture, New Mexico: School of American Research Press, 207–232.
65.
TaubL (2009) On scientific instruments. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science40(4): 337–343.
66.
TaubL (2011) Introduction: Reengaging with instruments. Isis102(4): 689–696.
67.
TaylorK (2009) Mogg’s celestial sphere (1813): The construction of polite astronomy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A40(4): 360–371.
68.
TurnerAJ (1993) Interpreting the history of scientific instruments. In: AndersonRGWBennettJARyanWF (eds) Making Instruments Count: Essays on Historical Scientific Instruments Presented to Gerard L’Estrange Turner. Aldershot: Variorum, 17–26.
69.
Van HeldenAHankinsTL (1994) Introduction: Instruments in the history of science. Osiris9: 1–6.
70.
VerbeekP-P (2005) What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. (trans. RP Crease). Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
71.
WarnerDJ (1990) What is a scientific instrument, when did it become one, and why?The British Journal for the History of Science23(1): 83–93.
72.
WarnierJ-P (2013) The sacred king, royal containers, alienable material contents, and value in contemporary Cameroon. In: HahnHPWeissH (eds) Mobility, Meaning and Transformations of Things: Shifting Contexts of Material Culture Through Time and Space. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 50–62.
73.
WitmoreC (2014) Archaeology and the new materialisms. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology1(2): 203–246.
