In this article, the authors examine tensions between understandings of material things as either bundles of relations or as things-in-themselves. Rather than take either of these positions, they instead set out an argument for approaches that allow them to modulate between these understandings whilst treating both as relational. Taking such a position allows them to consider how things endure through time without returning to any notion of essence. They explore the theoretical arguments through an analysis of one particular enduring material phenomenon: the Neolithic chambered tomb of West Kennet.
AlbertiBMarshallY (2009) Animating archaeology: Local theories and conceptually open-ended methodologies. Cambridge Archaeological Journal19: 344–356.
2.
BaradK (2003) Posthumanist performativity: How matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society28: 801–831.
3.
BaradK (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
BarrettJC (1988) The living, the dead and the ancestors: Neolithic and Early Bronze Age mortuary practices, In: BarrettJCKinnesI (eds) The Archaeology of Context in the Neolithic and Bronze Age: Recent Trends. Sheffield: JR Collis, 30–41.
5.
BaylissAWhittleAWysockiM (2007) Talking about my generation: The date of the West Kennet Long Barrow. Cambridge Archaeological Journal17: 85–101.
6.
BennettJ (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. London: Duke University Press.
7.
ConnellerC (2011) An Archaeology of Materials: Substantial Transformations in Early Prehistoric Europe. London: Routledge.
8.
DeLandaM (2006) A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.
9.
DeleuzeGGuattariF (2004) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Continuum.
10.
EdensorT (2011) Entangled agencies, material networks and repair in a building assemblage: The mutable stone of St Ann’s Church, Manchester. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers36: 238–52.
11.
EppersonM (2009) Quantum mechanics and relational realism: Logical causality and wave function collapse. Process Studies38(2): 339–366.
12.
FowlerC (2013) The Emergent Past: A Relational Realist Archaeology of Early Bronze Age Mortuary Practices
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
FowlerC (2014) Dynamic assemblages, or; the past is what endures: Change and the duration of relations. In: AlbertiB. (eds) Archaeology after Interpretation: Materials, Relations, Becoming. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, 235–256.
14.
GowlettJAJHallETHedgesREM (1986) The date of the West Kennet Long Barrow. Antiquity60: 143–144.
15.
HarawayD (1992) The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for inappropriate/d others. In: GrossbergL. (eds) Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge, 295–337.
HarrisOJT (2014) (Re)assembling communities. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory21: 76–97.
24.
HodderI (2012) Entanglement: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Oxford: Wylie-Blackwell.
25.
HolbraadM (2009) Ontology, ethnography, archaeology: An afterward on the ontography of things. Cambridge Archaeological Journal19: 431–441.
26.
IngoldT (2011) Being Alive: Essays in Movement, Knowledge and Description. London: Routledge.
27.
JonesAM (2012) Prehistoric Materialities: Becoming Material in Prehistoric Britain and Ireland. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
JonesS (2010) Negotiating authentic objects and authentic selves: Beyond the deconstruction of authenticity. Journal of Material Culture15: 181–203.
29.
JonesSYarrowT (2013) Crafting authenticity: An ethnography of conservation practice. Journal of Material Culture18: 3–26.
30.
LatourB (1999) Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
LatourBHarmanGErdélyiP (2011) The Prince and the Wolf: Latour and Harman at the LSE. Winchester: Zero Books.
32.
LucasG (2012) Understanding the Archaeological Record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
MarshallYAlbertiB (2014) A matter of difference: Karen Barad, ontology and archaeological bodies. Cambridge Archaeological Journal24: 19–36.
34.
McFadyenL (2007) Making architecture. In: BensonDWhittleA (eds) Building Memories: The Neolithic Cotswold Long Barrow at Ascott-under-Wychwood, Oxfordshire. Oxford: Oxbow, 348–354.
35.
OlsenB (2010) In Defense of Things: Archaeology and the Ontology of Objects. Plymouth: Altamira Press.
36.
OlsenB (2012) After interpretation: Remembering archaeology. Current Swedish Archaeology20: 11–34.
37.
OlsenB. (2012) Archaeology: The Discipline of Things. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38.
PiggottS (1958) The excavation of the West Kennet Long Barrow: 1955–56. Antiquity32: 235–242.
39.
PiggottS (1962) The West Kennet Long Barrow: Excavations 1955–56. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
40.
PyyhtinenOTamminenS (2011) ‘We have never been only human’: Foucault and Latour on the question of the anthropos. Anthropological Theory11: 135–352.
41.
ShaviroS (2011) The actual volcano: Whitehead, Harman, and the problem of relations. In: BryantL. (eds) The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism. Melbourne: Re.press, 279–290.
42.
SørensenMLS (1997) Material culture and typology. Current Swedish Archaeology5: 179–192.
43.
ThomasJ (2002) Archaeology’s humanism and the materiality of the body. In: HamilakisY. (eds) Thinking Through the Body: Archaeologies of Corporeality. London: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. 29–45.
44.
ThomasJWhittleA (1986) Anatomy of a tomb: West Kennet revisited. Oxford Journal of Archaeology5: 129–156.
45.
TilleyC (1994) A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths and Monuments. Oxford: Berg.
WebmoorTWitmoreCL (2008) Things are us! A commentary on human/things relations under the banner of a ‘social archaeology’. Norwegian Archaeological Review41: 1–18.
48.
WhiteheadAN (1964) The Concept of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49.
WitmoreCL (2007) Symmetrical archaeology: Excerpts of a manifesto. World Archaeology39: 546–562.
50.
WitmoreCL (2012) The realities of the past: Archaeology, object-orientations, pragmatology. In: FortenberryBRMcAtackneyL (eds) Modern Materials: Proceedings from the Contemporary and Historical Archaeology in Theory Conference 2009. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, 25–36.
