Two materials, disparate by some reckonings, are considered for the ways in which both are imbricated in contemporary status display. It is suggested that the role of status hierarchies in the public address of the Indigenous societies in British Columbia has been overlooked and that, due to the affective response they invoke, materials that represent these hierarchies are implicated in the contradictory tensions between display and disguise that characterize current status relations.
AskrenM (2011) Dancing our stone mask out of confinement: a twenty-first century Tsimshian epistemology. In: GlassA (ed.) Objects of Exchange: Social and Material Transformation on the Late Nineteenth-Century Northwest Coast. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 37–48.
2.
BennettJ (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3.
BoasF (1928) Primitive Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chuuchkamalthnii (Ron Hamilton) (in press) Nuuchaanulth Tlitsapilthim. Vancouver: Belkin Art Gallery Publications.
6.
DeimelCHollandSEVon BlohJC (eds) (2011) The Power of Giving/Die Macht des Schenkens. Berlin: Deutscher Kunstverlag.
7.
FabianJ (2007) Memory against Culture: Arguments and Reminders. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
8.
GlassA (ed.) (2011) Objects of Exchange: Social and Material Transformation on the Late Nineteenth-Century Northwest Coast. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
HelmsM (1993) Craft and the Kingly Ideal: Art, Trade, and Power. Austin: University of Texas Press.
10.
KeaneW (2005) Signs are not the garb of meaning: on the social analysis of material things. In: MillerD (ed.) Materiality. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 182–205.
11.
LyotardJ-F (1984[1979]) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
12.
ProteviJ (2009) Political Affect: Connecting the Social and the Somatic. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
13.
RowlandsM (2011) Of substances, places and museums: the visible and the invisible in the constitution of Cameroon. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute17: S23–S38.
14.
SegalenV (2002) Essay on Exoticism: An Aesthetics of Diversity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
15.
ShotridgeL (1919) A visit to the Tsimshian Indians (part 1). Museum Journal10(1–2): 49–67.
16.
SontagS (1966) Against Interpretation. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
17.
SpeckW (2011) The contemporary potlatch. In: DeimelC. (eds) The Power of Giving/Die Macht des Schenkens. Berlin: Deutscher Kunstverlag, 51–54.
18.
SwantonJ (1905) Contributions to the ethnology of the Haida. Memoirs of the American Museum of Natural HistoryVol. 8. Leiden: Brill & Stechert.
19.
ThomasN (1991) Entangled Objects: Exchange, Material Culture and Colonialism in the Pacific. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
Townsend-GaultC (2011) Not a museum but a cultural journey: Skwxwú7mesh political affect. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute17: S39–S55.
21.
Tuhiwai SmithL (1999) Decolonising Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books.
22.
Vivieros de CastroE (2004) Exchanging perspectives: the transformation of objects into subjects in Amerindian ontologies. Common Knowledge10(3): 463–484.
23.
ŽižekS (2009) The Parallax View. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
