Recent work by Alfred Gell echoes research methodologies used by anthropologists a century ago, when the new university discipline of anthropology was construed as a scientific subject. The early history of anthropology at Oxford University is explored with particular reference to Henry Balfour's work as curator of the Pitt Rivers Museum at the turn of the 20th century. Balfour and Gell both paid close attention to the formal qualities of things in an attempt to chart the linking threads of design and form which structure ‘distributed objects’. Balfour was concerned with human origins, while Gell tracked shifting ‘networks of transformational relationships’ with no origin, but their methodologies show similarities because they both prioritized the physicality of things. Exploring the strengths and weaknesses of an earlier, scientific approach to people and things helps us to understand and reassess our own intellectual (and material) ancestry.
Balfour, Henry (1889) ‘On the Structure and Affinities of the Composite Bow’, The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland19: 220–250.
2.
Balfour, Henry (1898a) ‘Notes on the Arrangement of the Pitt-Rivers Museum’, Pitt Rivers Museum Manuscript Collection, Balfour collection, box 5, University of Oxford.
3.
Balfour, Henry (1898b) ‘Notes on the Modern Use of Bone Skates’, Reliquary and Illustrated Archaeologist n.s. 4: 29–37.
4.
Balfour, Henry (1904) ‘Presidential Address to the Anthropological Section of the British Association for the Advancement of Science’, Cambridge, Pitt Rivers Museum Manuscript Collection, Balfour collection, box 5, University of Oxford.
5.
Balfour, Henry (1905) ‘President's Address’, The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland35: 13–19.
6.
Balfour, Henry (1907) ‘The Fire-Piston’, in W.H.R. Rivers, R.R. Marett and N.W. Thomas (eds) Anthropological Essays presented to Edward Burnett Tylor in honour of his 75th Birthday, pp. 17–50. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7.
Balfour, Henry (1913) ‘Kite-fishing’, in Edmund Crosby Quiggin (ed.) Essays and Studies presented to William Ridgeway on his Sixtieth Birthday, pp. 583–608. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Balfour, Henry (1923) ‘Presidential Address: The Geographical Study of Folklore’, Folk-Lore35: 16–25.
9.
Balfour, Henry (1937) ‘Spinners and Weavers in Anthropological Research’, The Frazer Lecture. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
10.
Brock, W.H. (1981) ‘Advancing Science: The British Association and the Professional Practice of Science’, in Roy MacLeod and Peter Collins (eds) The Parliament of Science: The British Association for the Advancement of Science 1831–1981, pp. 89–117. Northwood: Science Reviews Ltd.
11.
Brown, Alison, Coote, Jeremy and Gosden, Chris (2000) ‘Tylor's Tongue: Material Culture, Evidence and Social Networks’, Journal of the Anthropological Society Oxford31: 257–276.
12.
Clifford, James (1997) Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century. London: Harvard University Press
13.
Cousins, Julia (no date) The Pitt Rivers Museum: A Souvenir Guide to the Collections. Oxford: Pitt Rivers Museum.
14.
Edwards, Elizabeth, Gosden, Chris and Phillips, Ruth, eds (forthcoming) Sensible Objects: Colonialism, Museums, and Material Culture. Oxford: Berg.
15.
Fox, Robert (1997) ‘The University Museum and Oxford Science, 1850–1880’, in M.G. Brock and M.C. Curthoys (eds) The History of the University of Oxford, volume VI Nineteenth-Century Oxford, Part 1, pp. 641–693. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
16.
Gell, Alfred (1992) ‘The Technology of Enchantment’, in Jeremy Coote and Anthony Sheldon (eds) Anthropology, Art and Aesthetics, pp. 40–63. Oxford: Clarendon.
17.
Gell, Alfred (1993) Wrapping in Images: Tattooing in Polynesia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
18.
Gell, Alfred (1996) ‘Vogel's Net: Traps as Artworks and Artworks as Traps’, Journal of Material Culture1(1): 15–38.
19.
Gell, Alfred (1998) Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
Herle, Anita (1998) ‘The Life-Histories of Objects: Collections of the Cambridge Anthropological Expedition to the Torres Strait’, in Anita Herle and Sandra Rouse (eds) Cambridge and the Torres Strait: Centenary Essays on the 1898 Anthropological Expedition, pp. 77–105. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Howarth, O.R.J. (1922) The British Association for the Advancement of Science: A Retrospect 1831–1921. London: British Association for the Advancement of Science.
22.
Kuklick, Henrika (1991) The Savage Within: The Social History of British Anthropology, 1885–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Lane Fox, A. (1875) ‘On the Principles of Classification Adopted in the Arrangement of his Anthropological Collection, Now Exhibited in the Bethnal Green Museum’, Journal of Anthropological Institute4: 293–308.
24.
Latour, Bruno (2000) ‘When Things Strike Back: A Possible Contribution of “Science Studies” to the Social Sciences’, British Journal of Sociology51: 107–123.
25.
Latour, Bruno (2004) Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. London: Harvard University Press.
26.
Rivers, W.H.R. (1912) ‘A General Account of Method’, in Barbara Freire-Marreco and John Linton Myres (eds) Notes and Queries on Anthropology (4th edn), pp. 108–127. London: Royal Anthropological Institute.
27.
Tylor, Edward Burnett (1871) Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art and Custom. London: J. Murray.
28.
Van Keuren, David K. (1991) ‘From Natural History to Social Science: Disciplinary Development and Redefinition in British Anthropology, 1860–1910’, in J. Brown and D. van Keuren (eds) The Estate of Social Knowledge, pp. 45–66. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
29.
Vernon, H.M. and K.D. Vernon (1909) A History of the Oxford Museum. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
