Abstract
Wassmann's (1995) analysis is complemented by questioning the adequacy of supposed omniscient and expert knowledge of the ideal type who traditionally informed investigators about how 'order is made out of chaos' in his or her culture. Stratification of societies by any criterion-age sets, gender groups or differentiation of 'experts' from 'novices' reflects the fact that not all problems are consciously known by all members of a society. Relying on cultural persons' abilities to articulate the questions of their culture that may interest the researcher is limiting, especially if the researcher objectifies the information or the informant's abilities. However, if we recognize the informativeness of all cultural members in terms of their specialized knowledge, as no one cultural member is able to give an ideal or typical account of cultural knowledge, a realistic picture of the heterogeneity of both culture and human mind may be obtained. The same may be true of researchers-in the dialectics of interdisciplinary research projects, there are opportunities for a requiem for the omniscient researcher, beginnings of which can be found in Wassmann's analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
