Young adults face specific challenges, potentially impacting engagement with chronic pain self-management and coping. This project aims to explore the experiences of young adults with chronic pain to determine facilitators and barriers to self-management, identify coping strategies and understand how they map onto the COM-B model. A qualitative study was conducted with 14 adults aged 19–30 (10 females, 4 males) experiencing chronic pain in the UK. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Reflexive thematic analysis was used and three themes were developed: (1) Pivotal role of self-advocacy and diagnosis; (2) Understanding of chronic pain is essential for self-management; (3) Coping through compassion. This study provided insights regarding self-management and coping strategies and several practical implications are provided for healthcare and employment settings. Healthcare professionals should provide young adults with information regarding their chronic pain. Support from employers must also be improved to aid self-management.
ArnettJJ (2011) Emerging adulthood(s): The cultural psychology of a new life stage. In: JensenLA (ed.) Bridging Cultural and Developmental Approaches to Psychology: New Syntheses in Theory, Research, and Policy. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.255–275.
2.
BarlowJWrightCSheasbyJ, et al. (2002) Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: A review. Patient Education and Counseling48(2): 177–187.
3.
BerridgeKEHainsworthKRSimpsonPM, et al. (2024) Characterizing the effects of pain dismissal among adolescents with chronic pain. Journal of Pain25(4): 873–883.
4.
BraunVClarkeV (2021) To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health13(2): 201–216.
5.
BraunVClarkeV (2022) Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
6.
BraunVClarkeV (2024) A critical review of the reporting of reflexive thematic analysis in health promotional international. Health Promotion International39: daae049.
7.
BraunVClarkeVRanceN (2014) How to use thematic analysis with interview data (process research). In: VosslerAMollerN (eds) The Counselling and Psychotherapy Research Handbook. London: Sage, pp.183–197.
8.
BrownDSchenkSGenentD, et al. (2021) A scoping review of chronic pain in emerging adults. Pain Reports6(1): e920.
9.
BullDJoyIBagwellS, et al. (2014) Supporting Good Health: The Role of the Charity Sector. London: New Philanthropy Capital.
10.
CaseyBJGetzSGalvanA (2008) The adolescent brain. Developmental Review28(1): 62–77.
11.
CenaEBrooksJDayW, et al. (2024) Quality criteria: General and specific guidelines for qualitative approaches in psychology research. A concise guide for novice researchers and reviewers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods23: 16094069241282843.
12.
DudeneyJScottAJHathwayT, et al. (2024) Internet-delivered psychological pain-management for young adults with chronic pain: An investigation of clinical trial data. Journal of Pain25(6): 104447.
13.
FayazACroftPLangfordRM, et al. (2016) Prevalence of chronic pain in the UK: A systematic review and meta-analysis of population studies. BMJ Open6(6): e010364.
14.
FryerT (2022) A critical realist approach to thematic analysis: Producing causal explanations. Journal of Critical Realism21(4): 365–384.
15.
HammarbergKKirkmanMde LaceyS (2016) Qualitative research methods: When to use them and how to judge them. Human Reproduction31(3): 498–501.
16.
HestmannRBratåsOGrønningK (2023) Chronic pain self-management interventions in primary care–does it make any difference? A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research23(1): 537.
17.
HigginsonAForgeronPHarrisonD, et al. (2019) Moving on: Transition experiences of young adults with chronic pain. Canadian Journal of Pain3(1): 85–97.
18.
HoltSWaterfieldJ (2018) Cultural aspects of pain: A study of Indian Asian women in the UK. Musculoskeletal Care16(2): 260–268.
19.
Hurley-WallaceAKirbySBishopF (2022) Trusting in the online ‘community’: An interview study exploring internet use in young people with chronic pain. British Journal of Pain16(3): 341–353.
20.
JonesACaesLMcMurtryCM, et al. (2021) Socio developmental challenges faced by young people with chronic pain: A scoping review. Journal of Pediatric Psychology46(2): 219–230.
21.
JonkmanNHSchuurmansMJJaarsmaT, et al. (2016) Self-management interventions: Proposal and validation of a new operational definition. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology80: 34–42.
22.
JordanANoelMCaesL, et al. (2018) A developmental arrest? Interruption and identity in adolescent chronic pain. Pain Reports3: e678.
23.
LarssonCHanssonEESundquistK, et al. (2017) Chronic pain in older adults: Prevalence, incidence, and risk factors. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology46(4): 317–325.
24.
LeeseCGupteDChristogianniA, et al. (2024) Barriers and facilitators for physical activity in people living with chronic pain: A systematic review and combined analysis. Pain165(12): 2721–2732.
MalterudKSiersmaVDGuassoraAD (2016) Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research26(13): 1753–1760.
27.
MansellGHallAToomeyE (2016) Behaviour change and self-management interventions in persistent low back pain. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology30(6): 994–1002.
28.
MaxwellJA (2012) A Realist Approach for Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
29.
MeintsSMEdwardsRR (2018) Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry87(Pt B): 168–182.
30.
MichieSvan StralenMMWestR (2011) The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science6(1): 1–12.
31.
MurrayCBde la VegaRMurphyLK, et al. (2022) The prevalence of chronic pain in young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain163(9): e972–e984.
32.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2021) Chronic pain primary and secondary) in over 16s: assessment of all chronic pain and management of chronic primary pain. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng193 (accessed 20 May 2024).
33.
NevilleAJordanABeveridgeJK, et al. (2019) Diagnostic uncertainty in youth with chronic pain and their parents. The Journal of Pain20(9): 1080–1090.
34.
NicholasMKAsghariACorbettM, et al. (2012) Is adherence to pain self-management strategies associated with improved pain, depression and disability in those with disabling chronic pain?European Journal of Pain16(1): 93–104.
35.
NicolaMCorreiaHDitchburnG, et al. (2022) Defining pain-validation: The importance of validation in reducing the stresses of chronic pain. Frontiers in Pain Research3: 884335.
36.
RanjanPKumariAChakrawartyA (2015) How can doctors improve their communication skills?Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research9(3): JE01–JE04.
37.
SandhuHKShawJCarnesD, et al. (2022) Development and testing of an opioid tapering self-management intervention for chronic pain: I-WOTCH. BMJ Open12(3): e053725.
38.
SimpsonRMKnowlesEO’CathainA (2020) Health literacy levels of British adults: A cross-sectional survey using two domains of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). BMC Public Health20(1): 1819–1913.
39.
SmithJA (2015) Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. London: Sage Publications.
40.
StinsonJWhiteMIsaacL, et al. (2013) Understanding the information and service needs of young adults with chronic pain: Perspectives of young adults and their providers. Clinical Journal of Pain29(7): 600–612.
41.
TimmermanLStronksDLHuygenFJPM (2017) The design of a theory-based intervention to improve medication adherence in chronic pain patients. Current Medical Research and Opinion33(7): 1293–1301.
42.
TwiddyHHannaJHaynesL (2017) Growing pains: Understanding the needs of emerging adults with chronic pain. British Journal of Pain11(3): 108–118.
43.
UK Parliament Post (2023) Invisible disabilities in education and employment. Available at: POST-PN-0689.pdf (accessed 5 June 2025).
44.
VosTFlaxmanADNaghaviM, et al. (2012) Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet380(9859): 2163–2196.
