Hedonic hunger, pleasure-driven motivation to consume highly palatable foods independent of physical hunger, was conceptualized as a stable trait, yet may differ with biopsychosocial changes during pregnancy and postpartum. This study examined measurement equivalence and convergent validity of the Power of Food Scale (PFS), a measure of hedonic hunger, throughout pregnancy (each trimester) and postpartum (6 and 12 months) in N = 458 mothers in North Carolina, United States (Pregnancy Eating Attributes Study; 67.3% White, 15.1% Black) and in comparison to young adult women (N = 1333 from the NEXT Generation Health Study; 60.8% White, 15.8% Black). Confirmatory factor analysis supported longitudinal equivalence in pregnant/postpartum individuals and partial equivalence with young adult women. Associations of PFS with emotional eating, external eating, and delay of gratification supported convergent validity. PFS functions as expected during pregnancy and postpartum. Item-level comparisons to primarily non-pregnant populations should be avoided. Cognitive interviews may clarify item interpretations during pregnancy and postpartum.
AdamsRCChambersCDLawrenceNS (2019) Do restrained eaters show increased BMI, food craving and disinhibited eating? A comparison of the restraint scale and the restrained eating scale of the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire. Royal Society Open Science6(6): 190174.
2.
AliasghariFAsghari JafarabadiMLotfi YaghinN, et al. (2020) Psychometric properties of power of food scale in Iranian adult population: Gender-related differences in hedonic hunger. Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity25(1): 185–193.
3.
AllenDGShanockLR (2013) Perceived organizational support and embeddedness as key mechanisms connecting socialization tactics to commitment and turnover among new employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior34(3): 350–369.
4.
AppelhansBMWaringMESchneiderKL, et al. (2012) Delay discounting and intake of ready-to-eat and away-from-home foods in overweight and obese women. Appetite59(2): 576–584.
5.
AppelhansBMWoolfKPagotoSL, et al. (2011) Inhibiting food reward: Delay discounting, food reward sensitivity, and palatable food intake in overweight and obese women. Obesity19(11): 2175–2182.
6.
BeulenYHSuperSde VriesJHM, et al. (2020) Dietary interventions for healthy pregnant women: A systematic review of tools to promote a healthy antenatal dietary intake. Nutrients12(7): 1981.
7.
CappelleriJCBushmakinAGGerberRA, et al. (2009) Evaluating the power of food scale in obese subjects and a general sample of individuals: Development and measurement properties. International Journal of Obesity33(8): 913–922.
8.
CheungGWRensvoldRB (2002) Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal9(2): 233–255.
9.
ClarkMOgdenJ (1999) The impact of pregnancy on eating behaviour and aspects of weight concern. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders23(1): 18–24.
10.
EndersCK (2001) The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data. Psychological Methods6(4): 352–370.
11.
EpskampS (2019) semPlot: Path diagrams and visual analysis of various SEM packages’ output (1.1.2). Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semPlot. Accessed September 9, 2021.
Espel-HuynhHMMuratoreAFLoweMR (2018) A narrative review of the construct of hedonic hunger and its measurement by the power of food scale. Obesity Science & Practice4(3): 238–249.
14.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) (2009) Health behavior in school-age children: NEXT longitudinal study 2009-2016 (Clinical Trial Registration No. NCT01031160). clinicaltrials.gov. Available at:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01031160. Accessed March 31, 2022.
15.
HoergerMQuirkSWWeedNC (2011) Development and validation of the delaying gratification inventory. Psychological Assessment23(3): 725–738.
16.
HooperDCoughlanJMullenMR (2008) Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods6(1): 53–60.
JobstLJBaderMMoshagenM (2021) A tutorial on assessing statistical power and determining sample size for structural equation model. Psychological Methods28(1): 207–221.
19.
JorgensenTDPornprasertmanitSSchoemannAM, et al. (2021) semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling (0.5-4). Available at:https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools
20.
KhanRWaqasABilalA, et al. (2020) Association of maternal depression with diet: A systematic review. Asian Journal of Psychiatry52: 102098.
21.
KiddMHnatiukMBarberJ, et al. (2019) “Something is wrong with your milk”: Qualitative study of maternal dietary restriction and beliefs about infant colic. Canadian Family Physician Medecin de Famille Canadien65(3): 204–211.
22.
KrzeczkowskiJEBoylanKArbuckleTE, et al. (2020) Maternal pregnancy diet quality is directly associated with autonomic nervous system function in 6-month-old offspring. Journal of Nutrition150(2): 267–275.
23.
LarsenJKvan StrienTEisingaR, et al. (2007) Dietary restraint: Intention versus behavior to restrict food intake. Appetite49(1): 100–108.
24.
LawsonJLWiedemannAACarrMM, et al. (2020) Considering food addiction through a cultural lens. Current Addiction Reports7(3): 387–394.
25.
LipskyLMNanselTRHaynieDL, et al. (2016) Power of food scale in association with weight outcomes and dieting in a nationally representative cohort of U.S. young adults. Appetite105: 385–391.
26.
LipskyLMNanselTRHaynieDL, et al. (2019) Lack of prospective relationships of the power of food scale with Body Mass Index and dieting over 2 years in U.S. emerging adults. Eating Behaviors34: 101302.
27.
LittleTDRhemtullaMGibsonK, et al. (2013) Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods18(3): 285–300.
28.
LiziewskiKE (2020) Diet quality and fast food consumption in relation to food reward sensitivity and proximity to fast food restaurants among pregnant women. Bachelor’s major qualifying project report, Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
29.
LoweMRButrynML (2007) Hedonic hunger: A new dimension of appetite?Physiology & Behavior91(4): 432–439.
30.
LoweMRButrynMLDidieER, et al. (2009) The power of food scale. A new measure of the psychological influence of the food environment. Appetite53(1): 114–118.
31.
MarshallNEAbramsBBarbourLA, et al. (2022) The importance of nutrition in pregnancy and lactation: Lifelong consequences. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology226(5): 607–632.
32.
MitchellTBCushingCCAmaroCM (2016) Psychometric properties of the power of food scale in a community sample of preadolescents and adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies25(9): 2733–2739.
33.
MooneyJLipskyLMLiuA, et al. (2021) Does stress attenuate motivation for healthful eating in pregnancy and postpartum?Appetite163: 105207.
34.
MoshagenMErdfelderE (2016) A new strategy for testing structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal23(1): 54–60.
35.
NanselTRLipskyLMSiega-RizAM, et al. (2016) Pregnancy eating attributes study (PEAS): A cohort study examining behavioral and environmental influences on diet and weight change in pregnancy and postpartum. BMC Nutrition2: 45.
36.
OpieRSUldrichACBallK (2020) Maternal postpartum diet and postpartum depression: A systematic review. Maternal and Child Health Journal24(8): 966–978.
37.
PutnickDLBornsteinMH (2016) Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review41: 71–90.
38.
R Core Team (2022) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed July 17, 2022.
39.
ReyesNRKlotzAAHerringSJ (2013) A qualitative study of motivators and barriers to healthy eating in pregnancy for low-income, overweight, African-American mothers. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics113(9): 1175–1181.
40.
RhemtullaMBrosseau-LiardPÉSavaleiV (2012) When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods17(3): 354–373.
41.
RibeiroGSantosOCamachoM, et al. (2015) Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the power of food scale for use by adult populations in Portugal. Acta Medica Portuguesa28(5): 575–582.
42.
RosseelY (2012) Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software48(2): 1–36.
43.
RStudio Team (2022) RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. RStudio, PBC. Available at: http://www.rstudio.com/. Accessed July 17, 2022.
44.
SavaleiV (2019) A comparison of several approaches for controlling measurement error in small samples. Psychological Methods24(3): 352–370.
45.
SchultesBErnstBWilmsB, et al. (2010) Hedonic hunger is increased in severely obese patients and is reduced after gastric bypass surgery. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition92(2): 277–283.
46.
SerierKNBelonKESmithJM, et al. (2019) Psychometric evaluation of the power of food scale in a diverse college sample: Measurement invariance across gender, ethnicity, and weight status. Eating Behaviors35: 101336.
47.
Simons-MortonBHaynieDLiuD, et al. (2017) Next Generation Health Study (Version 1) [dataset]. NICHD Data and Specimen Hub. https://doi.org/10.57982/krdx-yh31
48.
TheimKRBrownJDJuarascioAS, et al. (2013) Relations of hedonic hunger and behavioral change to weight loss among adults in a behavioral weight loss program utilizing meal-replacement products. Behavior Modification37(6): 790–805.
VandenbergRJLanceCE (2000) A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods3(1): 4–70.
52.
van StrienT (2002) DEBQ: Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire: Manual. Thames Valley Test: Bury St. Edmunds, Suffolk, UK.
53.
van StrienTFrijtersJERBergersGPA, et al. (1986) The Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional, and external eating behavior. International Journal of Eating Disorders5(2): 295–315.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
