This study proposed and tested the cross-sectional effects of patient-centered communication (PCC) on cancer screening behaviors via an affective-cognitive sequential chain of mediation through cancer worry and health self-efficacy. Cross-sectional data were analyzed from four iterations of the Health Information National Trends Survey (2011, 2014, 2017, and 2020). The results found that lowered cancer worry following PCC does not show a cross-sectional positive effect in promoting cancer screening behaviors, while enhanced health self-efficacy as a subsequent state is a facilitator of screening behaviors. The findings further demonstrated increased PCC, a rise in cancer worry, and a sustained level of health self-efficacy. Also, our research has identified an upward trend in cancer screening behaviors from 2011 to 2017, followed by a notable decrease in 2020. These insights underscore the nuanced ways PCC can foster cancer screening behaviors, emphasizing the importance of emotional and cognitive aspects in clinical settings.
AmutaAOMkuuRSJacobsW, et al. (2018) Influence of cancer worry on four cancer related health protective behaviors among a nationally representative sample: Implications for health promotion efforts. Journal of Cancer Education33(5): 1002–1010.
4.
Blanch-HartiganDChawlaNMoserRP, et al. (2016) Trends in cancer survivors’ experience of patient-centered communication: Results from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Journal of Cancer Survivorship10(6): 1067–1077.
5.
BowenDJHelmesAPowersD, et al. (2003) Predicting breast cancer screening intentions and behavior with emotion and cognition. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology22(2): 213–232.
6.
CastroEMVan RegenmortelTVanhaechtK, et al. (2016) Patient empowerment, patient participation and patient-centeredness in hospital care: A concept analysis based on a literature review. Patient Education and Counseling99(12): 1923–1939.
7.
ChaeJLeeC-J (2019) The psychological mechanism underlying communication effects on behavioral intention: Focusing on affect and cognition in the cancer context. Communication Research46(5): 597–618.
8.
ChenYFeeleyTH (2014) Numeracy, information seeking, and self-efficacy in managing health: An analysis using the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Health Communication29(9): 843–853.
9.
ChoiELeeYYSuhM, et al. (2018) Associations of perceived risk and cancer worry for colorectal cancer with screening behaviour. Journal of Health Psychology23(6): 840–852.
10.
CloreGLGasperKGarvinE (2001) Affect as information. In: ForgasJP (ed.) Handbook of Affect and Social Cognition. New York: Psychology Press, pp.121–144.
11.
CohenJCohenPWestSG, et al. (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. London: Routledge.
12.
DeanMStreetRLJr (2014) A 3-stage model of patient-centered communication for addressing cancer patients’ emotional distress. Patient Education and Counseling94(2): 143–148.
13.
de JongCCRosWJSchrijversG (2014) The effects on health behavior and health outcomes of Internet-based asynchronous communication between health providers and patients with a chronic condition: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research16(1): e3000.
14.
DuffySWTabárLYenAM, et al. (2021) Beneficial effect of consecutive screening mammography examinations on mortality from breast cancer: A prospective study. Radiology299(3): 541–547.
15.
EpsteinRMStreetRLJr (2007) Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care: Promoting Healing and Reducing Suffering. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute.
16.
EpsteinRMStreetRLJr (2011) The values and value of patient-centered care. Annals of Family Medicine9(2): 100–103.
17.
GiaquintoANSungHMillerKD, et al. (2022) Breast cancer statistics, 2022. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians72(6): 524–541.
18.
GoodKNiziolekJYoshidaC, et al. (2010) Insights into barriers that prevent African Americans from seeking colorectal screenings: A qualitative study. Gastroenterology Nursing33(3): 204–208.
19.
HawkesDKeungMHTHuangY, et al. (2020) Self-collection for cervical screening programs: From research to reality. Cancers12(4): 1053.
20.
HayesAF (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Publications.
21.
HayJLBuckleyTROstroffJS (2005) The role of cancer worry in cancer screening: A theoretical and empirical review of the literature. Psycho-Oncology14(7): 517–534.
22.
HayJLMcCaulKDMagnanRE (2006) Does worry about breast cancer predict screening behaviors? A meta-analysis of the prospective evidence. Preventive Medicine42(6): 401–408.
23.
HibbardJHGreeneJ (2013) What the evidence shows about patient activation: Better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Affairs32(2): 207–214.
24.
HongHOhHJ (2020) The effects of patient-centered communication: Exploring the mediating role of trust in healthcare providers. Health Communication35(4): 502–511.
25.
JeppesenMMBergholdtSHBentzenAG, et al. (2023) Cancer worry is associated with increased use of supportive health care-results from the multinational InCHARGE study. Journal of Cancer Survivorship1–11.
26.
JiangS (2017) Pathway linking patient-centered communication to emotional well-being: Taking into account patient satisfaction and emotion management. Health Communication22(3): 234–242.
27.
JiangSHongYA (2018) Mobile-based patient-provider communication in cancer survivors: The roles of health literacy and patient activation. Psycho-Oncology27(3): 886–891.
28.
KatzMLJamesASPignoneMP, et al. (2004) Colorectal cancer screening among African American church members: A qualitative and quantitative study of patient-provider communication. BMC Public Health4(1): 62–68.
29.
KiviniemiMTEllisEM (2014) Worry about skin cancer mediates the relation of perceived cancer risk and sunscreen use. Journal of Behavioral Medicine37(6): 1069–1074.
30.
KogaHKTrudel-FitzgeraldCLeeLO, et al. (2022) Optimism, lifestyle, and longevity in a racially diverse cohort of women. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society70(10): 2793–2804.
31.
LangfordATEllisKROrellanaK, et al. (2023) Self-efficacy to get cancer-related information or advice. Journal of Cancer Education38(4): 1330–1337.
32.
LeeENatipagon-ShahBSangsanoi-TerkchareonS, et al. (2019) Factors influencing colorectal cancer screening among Thais in the U.S. Journal of Community Health44(2): 230–237.
33.
LeeSYHawkinsRP (2016) Worry as an uncertainty-associated emotion: Exploring the role of worry in health information seeking. Health Communication31(8): 926–933.
34.
LipkusIMJohnsonCAmarasekaraS, et al. (2019) Predicting colorectal cancer screening among adults who have never been screened: Testing the interaction between message framing and tailored risk feedback. Journal of Health Communication24(3): 262–270.
35.
LiuPLYeJFAoHS, et al. (2023a) Effects of electronic personal health information technology on American women’s cancer screening behaviors mediated through cancer worry: Differences and similarities between 2017 and 2020. Digital Health9: 20552076231185271.
36.
LiuPLYeoTEDYeJF (2023b) Examining the intervening roles of patient-centered care and patient activation in the health impacts of offline healthcare obstacles and online health consultations among deaf and hard-of-hearing patients. Health Communication. 1–10.
37.
LiuPLZhangLMaX, et al. (2023c) Communication matters: The role of patient-centered communication in improving old adults’ health competence and health outcomes. Health Communication39(2): 363–375.
38.
LiuPLZhaoXYeJF (2022) The effects of the use of patient-accessible electronic health record portals on cancer survivors’ health outcomes: Cross-sectional survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research24(10): e39614.
39.
LuLLiuJYuanYC (2022) Cultural differences in cancer information acquisition: Cancer risk perceptions, fatalistic beliefs, and worry as predictors of cancer information seeking and avoidance in the U.S. and China. Health Communication37(11): 1442–1451.
40.
LuYHuangY-HC (2018) Getting emotional: An emotion-cognition dual-factor model of crisis communication. Public Relations Review44(1): 98–107.
41.
McCaulKDMullensAB (2003) Affect, thought and self-protective health behavior: The case of worry and cancer screening. In: SulsJWallstonKA (eds) Social Psychological Foundations of Health and Illness. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, pp.137–168.
42.
McCormackLATreimanKRupertD, et al. (2011) Measuring patient-centered communication in cancer care: A literature review and the development of a systematic approach. Social Science & Medicine72(7): 1085–1095.
43.
McKeownLHongYAKrepsGL, et al. (2023) Trends and differences in perceptions of patient-centered communication among adults in the US. Patient Education and Counseling106: 128–134.
44.
MillerMJXuLQinJ, et al. (2021) Impact of COVID-19 on cervical cancer screening rates among women aged 21–65 years in a large integrated health care system – Southern California, January 1–September 30, 2019, and January 1–September 30, 2020. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report70(4): 109–113.
45.
MoserRPMcCaulKPetersE, et al. (2007) Associations of perceived risk and worry with cancer health-protective actions: Data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Journal of Health Psychology12(1): 53–65.
46.
MurffHJByrneDSyngalS (2004) Cancer risk assessment: Quality and impact of the family history interview. American Journal of Preventive Medicine27(3): 239–245.
47.
MurphySKochanekKXuJ, et al. (2021) Mortality in the United States, 2020. NCHS Data Brief.
48.
MusaJAchenbachCJO’DwyerLC (2017) Correction: Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One12(12): e0190661.
49.
NabiR (2002) Anger, fear, uncertainty, and attitudes: A test of the cognitive-functional model. Communication Monographs69(3): 204–216.
NishimuraYAcobaJD (2022) Impact of breast cancer awareness month on public interest in the United States between 2012 and 2021: A Google trends analysis. Cancers14(10): 2524.
52.
OhKMAnKLeeM, et al. (2023) Colorectal cancer screening disparities in Asian Americans: The influences of patient-provider communication and social media use. Cancer Causes & Control34(9): 813–827.
53.
PietteJDWeinbergerMMcPheeSJ (2000) The effect of automated calls with telephone nurse follow-up on patient-centered outcomes of diabetes care: A randomized, controlled trial. Medical Care38(2): 218–230.
54.
PortnoyDBLoudJTHanPK, et al. (2015) Effects of false-positive cancer screenings and cancer worry on risk-reducing surgery among BRCA1/2 carriers. Health Psychology34(7): 709–717.
55.
RajaramSGuptaB (2021) Screening for cervical cancer: Choices & dilemmas. Indian Journal of Medical Research154(2): 210–220.
56.
SaadatmandSGeuzingeHARutgersEJT, et al. (2019) MRI versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women with familial risk (FaMRIsc): A multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncology20(8): 1136–1147.
57.
Sardessai-NadkarniAAStreetRLJr (2023) Understanding the pathways linking patient-centered communication to cancer survivors’ emotional health: Examining the mediating roles of self-efficacy and cognitive reappraisal. Journal of Cancer Survivorship17: 1266–1275.
58.
SchwarzerRFuchsR (1996) Self-efficacy and health behaviours. In: ConnerMNormanP (eds) Predicting Health Behavior: Research and Practice With Social Cognition Models. Buckingham: Open University Press, pp.163–196.
59.
ShahmoradiZDamgaciogluHClarkeM, et al. (2022) Cervical cancer incidence among US women, 2001–2019. Journal of the American Medical Association328(22): 2267–2269.
60.
SilkKJPerraultEKNazioneS, et al. (2015) The influence of provider patient-centeredness on patients’ decisions to undergo cancer screening surveillance tests: An analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey. Communication Research Reports32(2): 159–169.
61.
SilkKJWestermanCKStromR, et al. (2008) The role of patient-centeredness in predicting compliance with mammogram recommendations: An analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey. Communication Research Reports25(2): 131–144.
62.
SlovicPFinucaneMPetersE, et al. (2002) The affect heuristic. In: Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.397–420.
63.
SmithRAAndrewsKSBrooksD, et al. (2019) Cancer screening in the United States, 2019: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians69(3): 184–210.
64.
SohlerNLJerantAFranksP (2015) Socio-psychological factors in the expanded health belief model and subsequent colorectal cancer screening. Patient Education and Counseling98(7): 901–907.
65.
SpoonerKKSalemiJLSalihuHM, et al. (2016) Disparities in perceived patient–provider communication quality in the United States: Trends and correlates. Patient Education and Counseling99(5): 844–854.
66.
StreetRL (2003) Communication in medical encounters: An ecological perspective. In: ThompsonTLParrottRNussbaumJF (eds) Handbook of Health Communication. New York: Routledge, pp.63–89.
67.
StreetRLJr (2013) How clinician-patient communication contributes to health improvement: Modeling pathways from talk to outcome. Patient Education and Counseling92(3): 286–291.
68.
StreetRLJrMakoulGAroraNK, et al. (2009) How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Education and Counseling74(3): 295–301.
69.
Sun YoungLHwangHHawkinsR, et al. (2008) Interplay of negative emotion and health self-efficacy on the use of health information and its outcomes. Communication Research35(3): 358–381.
70.
TallisFEysenckMW (1994) Worry: Mechanisms and modulating influences. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy22(1): 37–56.
71.
TotzkayDSilkKJSheffSE (2017) The effect of electronic health record use and patient-centered communication on cancer screening behavior: An analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey. Journal of Health Communication22(7): 554–561.
72.
TrentoMPasseraPTomalinoM, et al. (2001) Group visits improve metabolic control in type 2 diabetes: A 2-year follow-up. Diabetes Care24(6): 995–1000.
73.
UnderhillMLKiviniemiMT (2011) The association of perceived provider–patient communication and relationship quality with colorectal cancer screening. Health Education & Behavior39(5): 555–563.
74.
VillaniJMortensenK (2013) Patient-provider communication and timely receipt of preventive services. Preventive medicine57(5): 658–663.
75.
VrintenCMcGregorLMHeinrichM, et al. (2017) What do people fear about cancer? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of cancer fears in the general population. Psycho-oncology26(8): 1070–1079.
76.
WittenbergEGoldsmithJVChenC, et al. (2021) Opportunities to improve COVID-19 provider communication resources: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling104(3): 438–451.
77.
ZhangLHarris AoSFrancis YeJ, et al. (2024) How does health communication on social media influence e-cigarette perception and use? A trend analysis from 2017 to 2020. Addictive Behaviors149: 107875.
78.
ZhangLRChiarelliAMGlendonG, et al. (2012) Worry is good for breast cancer screening: A study of female relatives from the Ontario site of the breast cancer family registry. Journal of Cancer Epidemiology2012: 545062.
79.
ZhaoXLynchJGChenQ (2010) Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research37(2): 197–206.
80.
ZhaoXNanX (2016) The influence of absolute and comparative risk perceptions on cervical cancer screening and the mediating role of cancer worry. Journal of Health Communication21(1): 100–108.
81.
ZhuangJGuanM (2022) Modeling the mediating and moderating roles of risk perceptions, efficacy, desired uncertainty, and worry in information seeking-cancer screening relationship using HINTS 2017 Data. Health Communication37(7): 897–908.
82.
ZouW (2021) How do patient-centered communication, emotional well-being, confidence in health information-seeking, and future time perspective influence health self-efficacy?American Journal of Health Education52(3): 1–8.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
