Excessive sugar intake poses a significant risk factor for non-communicable diseases. A positive healthy eating (PHE) intervention was developed to promote low-sugar dietary practices in families. The PHE intervention capitalized on positive psychological constructs to overcome barriers to health behavior change by helping families associate feelings of joy, gratitude, and savoring with healthy eating. In a cluster randomized controlled trial, 1983 participants from 1467 families were recruited in Hong Kong. PHE included a core and booster session. Data were collected at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and at 1-month and 3-month follow-up. Compared to the control, PHE showed greater increase in intention to change at post-intervention, engagement in low-sugar dietary practices individually and with family members at 3-month follow-up, and greater reduction in sugar-sweetened beverage intake at 1-month and 3-month follow-up. Intentions to change mediated PHE’s effects on low-sugar dietary practices. Focus group interviews revealed the behavior-change process and family quality of life.
AdriaanseMAVinkersCDWDe RidderDTD, et al. (2011) Do implementation intentions help to eat a healthy diet? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Appetite56(1): 183–193.
2.
AlbarracínDWilsonKChanMS, et al. (2018) Action and inaction in multi-behaviour recommendations: A meta-analysis of lifestyle interventions. Health Psychology Review12(1): 1–24.
3.
AmonooHLCelanoCMSadlonovaM, et al. (2021) Is optimism a protective factor for cardiovascular disease?Current Cardiology Reports23(11): 158.
4.
BiswasTTownsendNHudaMM, et al. (2022) Prevalence of multiple non-communicable diseases risk factors among adolescents in 140 countries: A population-based study. eClinicalMedicine52: 101591.
5.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
6.
BredaJJewellJKellerA (2019) The importance of the World Health Organization sugar guidelines for dental health and obesity prevention. Caries Research53(2): 149–152.
7.
BrittainMConsedineNBagotKL, et al. (2021) Sugar Habit Hacker: Initial evidence that a planning intervention reduces sugar intake. Journal of Behavioral Addictions10(3): 471–481.
8.
BurtonCMKingLA (2004) The health benefits of writing about intensely positive experiences. Journal of Research in Personality38(2): 150–163.
9.
CampbellKJCrawfordDASalmonJ, et al. (2007) Associations between the home food environment and obesity-promoting eating behaviors in adolescence. Obesity (Silver Spring)15(3): 719–730.
10.
CampbellMKThomsonSRamsayCR, et al. (2004) Sample size calculator for cluster randomized trials. Computers in Biology and Medicine34(2): 113–125.
11.
CarreroIVilàIRedondoR (2019) What makes implementation intention interventions effective for promoting healthy eating behaviours? A meta-regression. Appetite140: 239–247.
ChuJTWHoHCYMuiM, et al. (2018) Happy Family Kitchen II: Participants’ perspectives of a community-based family intervention. Journal of Child and Family Studies27(5): 1629–1639.
14.
ConlinLAAguilarDTRogersGE, et al. (2021) Flexible vs. rigid dieting in resistance-trained individuals seeking to optimize their physiques: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition18(1): 52.
15.
DuboisCMBeachSRKashdanTB, et al. (2012) Positive psychological attributes and cardiac outcomes: Associations, mechanisms, and interventions. Psychosomatics53(4): 303–318.
16.
DusseldorpEvan GenugtenLvan BuurenS, et al. (2014) Combinations of techniques that effectively change health behavior: Evidence from Meta-CART analysis. Health Psychology33(12): 1530–1540.
17.
EggerMJüniPBartlettC (2001) Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials. Jama285(15): 1996–1999.
18.
FisherLDDixonDOHersonJ, et al. (1990) Intention to treat in clinical trials. In: PeaceKE (ed.) Statistical Issues in Drug Research and Development. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
19.
GattshallMLShoupJAMarshallJA, et al. (2008) Validation of a survey instrument to assess home environments for physical activity and healthy eating in overweight children. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity5: 3.
20.
GBD 2017 Diet Collaborators (2019) Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990-2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet393(10184): 1958–1972.
21.
GrahamJWHoferSMMacKinnonDP (1996) Maximizing the usefulness of data obtained with planned missing value patterns: An application of maximum likelihood procedures. Multivariate Behavioral Research31(2): 197–218.
22.
GriffinTLJacksonDMMcNeillG, et al. (2015) A brief educational intervention increases knowledge of the sugar content of foods and drinks but does not decrease intakes in Scottish children aged 10-12 years. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior47(4): 367–373.e361.
23.
HayesAF (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
24.
HedrickVESavlaJComberDL, et al. (2012) Development of a brief questionnaire to assess habitual beverage intake (BEVQ-15): Sugar-sweetened beverages and total beverage energy intake. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics112(6): 840–849.
25.
HendriksTSchotanus-DijkstraMHassankhanA, et al. (2020) The efficacy of multi-component positive psychology interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Happiness Studies21: 357–390.
26.
HoHCYMuiMWanA, et al. (2016a) Happy Family Kitchen II: A cluster randomized controlled trial of a community-based family intervention for enhancing family communication and well-being in Hong Kong. Frontiers in Psychology7: 638.
27.
HoHCYMuiMWanA, et al. (2016b) Happy Family Kitchen II: A cluster randomized controlled trial of a community-based positive psychology family intervention for subjective happiness and health-related quality of life in Hong Kong. Trials17: 367.
28.
HoHCYMuiMWanA, et al. (2016c) Happy Family Kitchen: A community-based research for enhancing family communication and well-being in Hong Kong. Journal of Family Psychology30(6): 752–762.
29.
HoHCYMuiMWanA, et al. (2017) Happy Family Kitchen: Behavioral outcomes of a brief community-based family intervention in Hong Kong. Journal of Child and Family Studies26: 2852–2864.
30.
HoHCYMuiMW-kWanA, et al. (2020a) A cluster randomized controlled trial of a positive physical activity intervention. Health Psychology39(8): 667–678.
31.
HoHCYMuiMW-kWanA, et al. (2020b) Happy Family Kitchen Movement: A cluster randomized controlled trial of a community-based family holistic health intervention in Hong Kong. Journal of Happiness Studies21(1): 15–36.
32.
HolderMD (2019) The contribution of food consumption to well-being. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism74(Suppl. 2): 44–52.
33.
HowellRTKernMLLyubomirskyS (2007) Health benefits: Meta-analytically determining the impact of well-being on objective health outcomes. Health Psychology Review1(1): 83–136.
34.
HuangYChenZChenB, et al. (2023) Dietary sugar consumption and health: Umbrella review. BMJ381: e071609.
35.
KesavayuthDShangkhumPZikosV (2022) Well-being and physical health: A mediation analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies23(6): 2849–2879.
36.
KruegerRACaseyMA (2014) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
LaiAYStewartSMMuiMW, et al. (2017) An evaluation of a train-the-trainer workshop for social service workers to develop community-based family interventions. Frontiers in Public Health5: 141.
38.
LairdNMWareJH (1982) Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics38(4): 963–974.
39.
LawtonRConnerMMcEachanR (2009) Desire or reason: Predicting health behaviors from affective and cognitive attitudes. Health Psychology28(1): 56–65.
40.
McDermottMSOliverMIversonD, et al. (2016) Effective techniques for changing physical activity and healthy eating intentions and behaviour: A systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Health Psychology21(4): 827–841.
41.
MalikVSHuFB (2019) Sugar-sweetened beverages and cardiometabolic health: An update of the evidence. Nutrients11(8): 1840.
42.
MichieSAbrahamCWhittingtonC, et al. (2009) Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: A meta-regression. Health Psychology28(6): 690–701.
43.
MooreJBFieldingBA (2016) Sugar and metabolic health: Is there still a debate?Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care19(4): 303–309.
44.
NCD Countdown 2030 Collaborators (2018) NCD Countdown 2030: Worldwide trends in non-communicable disease mortality and progress towards Sustainable Development Goal target 3.4. Lancet392(10152): 1072–1088.
45.
PietrantoniDMayrovitzHN (2022) The impacts of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) on cardiovascular health. Cureus14(7): e26908.
46.
SamdalGBEideGEBarthT, et al. (2017) Effective behaviour change techniques for physical activity and healthy eating in overweight and obese adults; systematic review and meta-regression analyses. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity14(1): 42.
47.
SchiavonCCMarchettiEAyalaFO, et al. (2020) Positive psychological characteristics in patients with metabolic syndrome associated with prospective changes in diet and anthropometric factors. PLoS One15(9): e0236693.
48.
SchuellerSM (2010) Preferences for positive psychology exercises. The Journal of Positive Psychology5: 192–203.
49.
SchwarzerR (2008) Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Applied Psychology57(1): 1–29.
50.
SeligmanMEPRashidTParksAC (2006) Positive psychotherapy. American Psychologist61(8): 774–788.
51.
SeligmanMEPSteenTAParkN, et al. (2005) Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist60(5): 410–421.
52.
SheridanSMWarnesEDCowanRJ, et al. (2004) Family-centered positive psychology: Focusing on strengths to build student success. Psychology in the Schools41: 7–17.
53.
SpiethPMKubaschASPenzlinAI, et al. (2016) Randomized controlled trials - a matter of design. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment12: 1341–1349.
54.
SpothRLKavanaghKADishionTJ (2002) Family-centered preventive intervention science: Toward benefits to larger populations of children, youth, and families. Prevention Science3(3): 145–152.
55.
SpringBChampionKEAcabchukR, et al. (2021) Self-regulatory behaviour change techniques in interventions to promote healthy eating, physical activity, or weight loss: A meta-review. Health Psychology Review15(4): 508–539.
56.
SullivanVKJohnstonEAFirestoneMJ, et al. (2021) Self-rated diet quality and cardiometabolic health among U.S. adults, 2011-2018. American Journal of Preventive Medicine61(4): 563–575.
57.
Van CappellenPRiceELCatalinoLI, et al. (2018) Positive affective processes underlie positive health behaviour change. Psychology & Health33(1): 77–97.
58.
WangMLLemonSCClausenK, et al. (2016) Design and methods for a community-based intervention to reduce sugar-sweetened beverage consumption among youth: H2GO! study. BMC Public Health16(1): 1150.
59.
WijayaratneSPReidMWestbergK, et al. (2018) Food literacy, healthy eating barriers and household diet. European Journal of Marketing52(12): 2449–2477.
60.
YinHZeyuCBoC, et al. (2023) Dietary sugar consumption and health: Umbrella review. BMJ381: e071609.
61.
ZhouQChanSS-cStewartSM, et al. (2016) The effectiveness of positive psychology interventions in enhancing positive behaviors and family relationships in Hong Kong: A community-based participatory research project. The Journal of Positive Psychology11(1): 70–84.
62.
ZoellnerJMHedrickVEYouW, et al. (2016) Effects of a behavioral and health literacy intervention to reduce sugar-sweetened beverages: A randomized-controlled trial. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity13: 38.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
