This study examines the effectiveness of distance-framed narratives in deterring e-cigarette use among young adults. Through an online experiment (N = 916), this study investigates how narratives with different distance cues influence participants’ narrative engagement, perceived psychological distance, and compliance with the message. The findings suggest that distance-framed narratives heighten identification. Increased identification reduces perceived psychological distance, leading to more negative attitudes, decreased e-cigarette use intention, and stronger policy support. E-cigarette use status also impacts persuasive outcomes. Non-users tend to be more receptive to narratives featuring congruent distance cues in character and scenario depictions. Users are motivated by narratives that present an uncertain scenario, regardless of whether the character is portrayed as socially close or distant.
AjzenI (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50(2): 179–211.
2.
AmitEWakslakCTropeY (2013) The use of visual and verbal means of communication across psychological distance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin39(1): 43–56.
3.
BakerFJohnsonMWBickelWK (2003) Delay discounting in current and never-before cigarette smokers: Similarities and differences across commodity, sign, and magnitude. Journal of Abnormal Psychology112(3): 382–392.
4.
BraddockKDillardJP (2016) Meta-analytic evidence for the persuasive effect of narratives on beliefs, attitudes, intentions, and behaviors. Communication Monographs83(4): 446–467.
5.
BrüggerA (2020) Understanding the psychological distance of climate change: The limitations of construal level theory and suggestions for alternative theoretical perspectives. Global Environmental Change60: 102023.
ChuHYangJZ (2018) Taking climate change here and now – Mitigating ideological polarization with psychological distance. Global Environmental Change53: 174–181.
8.
ChuHYuanSLiuS (2021) Call them COVIDiots: Exploring the effects of aggressive communication style and psychological distance in the communication of COVID-19. Public Understanding of Science30(3): 240–257.
9.
CohenJ (2001) Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society4(3): 245–264.
10.
CollinsLGlasserAMAbudayyehH, et al. (2019) E-cigarette marketing and communication: How e-cigarette companies market e-cigarettes and the public engages with e-cigarette information. Nicotine & Tobacco Research21(1): 14–24.
11.
DunlopSMWakefieldMKashimaY (2010) Pathways to persuasion: Cognitive and experiential responses to health-promoting mass media messages. Communication Research37(1): 133–164.
12.
GreenMCBrockTC (2000) The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology79(5): 701–721.
13.
HayesAF (2017) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Publications.
14.
KellerPALehmannDR (2008) Designing effective health communications: A meta-analysis. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing27(2): 117–130.
15.
KimJNanX (2019) Temporal framing effects differ for narrative versus non-narrative messages: The case of promoting HPV vaccination. Communication Research46(3): 401–417.
16.
KreuterMWGreenMCCappellaJN, et al. (2007) Narrative communication in cancer prevention and control: A framework to guide research and application. Annals of Behavioral Medicine33(3): 221–235.
17.
LibermanNTropeY (2014) Traversing psychological distance. Trends in Cognitive Sciences18(7): 364–369.
18.
LiuSYangJZ (2020a) Incorporating message framing into narrative persuasion to curb E-Cigarette use among college students. Risk Analysis40(8): 1677–1690.
19.
LiuSYangJZ (2020b) The role of temporal distance perception in narrative vs. Non-narrative persuasion related to e-cigarettes. Journal of Health Communication25(7): 543–553.
20.
LiuSYangJZ (2023) Narrative persuasion and psychological distance: Analyzing the effectiveness of distance-framed narratives in communicating ocean plastic pollution. Risk Analysis43: 2099–2113.
21.
LiuSYangJZChuH (2021) When we increase fear, do we dampen hope? Using narrative persuasion to promote human papillomavirus vaccination in China. Journal of Health Psychology26(11): 1999–2009.
22.
McQueenAKreuterMWKalesanB, et al. (2011) Understanding narrative effects: The impact of breast cancer survivor stories on message processing, attitudes, and beliefs among African American women. Health Psychology30(6): 674–682.
23.
MurphySTFrankLBChatterjeeJS, et al. (2013) Narrative versus non-narrative: The role of identification, transportation, and emotion in reducing health disparities. Journal of Communication63(1): 116–137.
RickardLNYangZJSchuldtJP (2016) Here and now, there and then: How “departure dates” influence climate change engagement. Global Environmental Change38: 97–107.
26.
RobertsMETackettAPSingerJM, et al. (2022) Dual use of e-cigarettes and cannabis among young people in America: A new public health hurdle?Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs83(5): 768–770.
27.
RomijndersKAGJvan OschLde VriesH, et al. (2018) Perceptions and reasons regarding e-cigarette use among users and non-users: A narrative literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health15(6): 1190.
SestirMGreenMC (2010) You are who you watch: Identification and transportation effects on temporary self-concept. Social Influence5(4): 272–288.
30.
ShenFSheerVCLiR (2015) Impact of narratives on persuasion in health communication: A meta-analysis. Journal of Advertising44(2): 105–113.
31.
SlaterMDJohnsonBKCohenJ, et al. (2014) Temporarily expanding the boundaries of the self: Motivations for entering the story world and implications for narrative effects. Journal of Communication64(3): 439–455.
32.
SlaterMDRounerD (2002) Entertainment?education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory12(2): 173–191.
33.
TropeYLibermanN (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review117(2): 440–463.
34.
TropeYLibermanNWakslakC (2007) Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology17(2): 83–95.
WeinsteinNDLyonJE (1999) Mindset, optimistic bias about personal risk and health-protective behaviour. British Journal of Health Psychology4(4): 289–300.
37.
WitteK (1994) Fear control and danger control: A test of the extendeo antismoking messaged parallel process model (EPPM). Communication Monographs61(2): 113–134.
38.
ZhaoXPetersonE (2017) Effects of temporal framing on response ts: The mediating role of perceived relevance. Journal of Health Communication22(1): 37–44.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
