Little is known about the perceptions of the COVID-19 pandemic’s dynamic and its effect on self-protective behaviour. Using survey data from 1343 university students we explored how the perceived temporal distance to the COVID pandemic peak associates with risk perception and the adherence of preventive behaviours. Results show that individuals differ in their perception of the pandemic stage despite being in the same environment. The belief that the COVID peak is in the past was associated with less perceived risk and decreased self-protection. A high COVID-19 media involvement and trust in the authorities were associated with higher perceived risk and preventive behaviour implementation. Overall, the perception that the pandemic wave is in its final stages could be an independent predictor of more risky behaviour. Thus, the communication of the pandemic dynamic should be provided by policy makers with caution to avoid the possibility of discounting the risk.
AbramowitzJSBlakeySM (2020) Overestimation of threat. In: AbramovitzJSBlakeySM (eds) Clinical Handbook of Fear and Anxiety. Maintenance Processes and Treatment Mechanisms. American Psychological Association, pp.7–26, Available at: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-52029-001 (accessed 2 August 2023).
2.
BeardenWOSharmaSTeelJE (1982) Sample size effects on chi square and other statistics used in evaluating causal models. Journal of Marketing Research19(4): 425.
3.
BechardLEBergeltMNeudorfB, et al. (2021) Using the health belief model to understand age differences in perceptions and responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology12: 609893. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.609893.
4.
BreakwellGMFinoEJaspalR (2022) COVID-19 preventive behaviours in White British and Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) people in the UK. Journal of Health Psychology27(6): 1301–1317.
5.
BridgmanAMerkleyELoewenPJ, et al. (2020) The causes and consequences of COVID-19 misperceptions: Understanding the role of news and social media. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. DOI: 10.37016/mr-2020-028
6.
Bruine de BruinW (2021) Age differences in COVID-19 risk perceptions and mental health: Evidence from a national U.S. survey conducted in March 2020. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences76(2): e24–e29.
7.
BrüssowH (2021) COVID-19 by numbers - Infections, cases and deaths. Environmental Microbiology23(3): 1322–1333.
8.
ByrnesJPMillerDCSchaferWD (1999) Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin125(3): 367–383.
9.
CarpenterCJ (2010) A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of health belief model variables in predicting behavior. Health Communication25(8): 661–669.
10.
ChandranSMenonG (2004) When a day means more than a year: Effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk. Journal of Consumer Research31(2): 375–389.
11.
CovelloVT (1992) Risk communication: An emerging area of health communication research. Annals of the International Communication Association15(1): 359–373.
12.
DingYXuJHuangS, et al. (2020) Risk perception and depression in public health crises: Evidence from the COVID-19 crisis in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17(16): 5728.
13.
DryhurstSSchneiderCRKerrJ, et al. (2020) Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world. Journal of Risk Research23(7-8): 994–1006.
14.
ElmerTStadtfeldC (2020) Depressive symptoms are associated with social isolation in face-to-face interaction networks. Scientific Reports10(1): 1444.
15.
FenleyARLangerDABlakePR, et al. (2021) The relation between risk perception and anxiety in youth: An investigation using a novel developmentally tailored measure. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment43(4): 808–821.
16.
FongMWGaoHWongJY, et al. (2020) Nonpharmaceutical measures for pandemic Influenza in nonhealthcare settings-social distancing measures. Emerging Infectious Diseases26(5): 976–984.
17.
GallagherJ (2020) Covid: When will it be over and we can do this again?BBC News, 31October. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/health-54661843 (accessed 18 August 2023).
18.
GlanzKRimerBKViswanathK (eds.). (2008). Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. John Wiley & Sons.
19.
GustafsodPE (1998) Gender differences in risk perception: Theoretical and methodological erspectives. Risk Analysis18(6): 805–811.
20.
HarperCASatchellLPFidoD, et al. (2021) Functional fear predicts public health compliance in the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction19(5): 1875–1888.
21.
HookerCLeaskJ (2020) Risk communication should be explicit about values. A perspective on early communication during COVID-19. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry17(4): 581–589.
22.
HuLBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55.
23.
IbukaYChapmanGBMeyersLA, et al. (2010) The dynamics of risk perceptions and precautionary behavior in response to 2009 (H1N1) pandemic influenza. BMC Infectious Diseases10(1): 296.
24.
Interfax (2020) Ученые спрогнозировали, что распространение COVID-19 снизится зимой. Interfax, 15October. Available at: https://www.interfax.ru/russia/731563 (accessed 18 August 2023).
25.
JallohMFLiWBunnellRE, et al. (2018) Impact of Ebola experiences and risk perceptions on mental health in Sierra Leone, July2015. BMJ Global Health3(2): e000471, doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000471.
26.
JolleyDDouglasKM (2014) The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLoS One9(2).
27.
JosePELimBTL (2014) Social connectedness predicts lower loneliness and depressive symptoms over time in adolescents. Open Journal of Depression03(04): 154–163.
28.
KashteSGulbakeAEl-Amin IiiSF, et al. (2021) COVID-19 vaccines: Rapid development, implications, challenges and future prospects. Human Cell34(3): 711–733.
29.
KaspersonREWeblerTRamB, et al. (2022) The social amplification of risk framework: New perspectives. Risk Analysis42(7): 1367–1380.
30.
KimS (2017) Applying the public’s perception of temporal distance into crisis communication: An extended concept of threat. In: 20th International public relations research conference: looking back, looking forward: 20 Years of developing theory & practice, Orlando, USA, 8–12 March 2017, pp.100–111. Available at: https://www.instituteforpr.org/wp-content/uploads/IPRRC20-proceedings_Final.pdf (accessed 2 August 2023).
31.
KimSChonM-G (2023) Embodying temporality in response efficacy: How coping appraisal promotes preventive behavioral engagement during the ongoing pandemic. Health Communication38: 2359–2369.
32.
KroenkeKSpitzerRLWilliamsJB (2001) The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine16(9): 606–613.
33.
LauJTGriffithsSChoiKC, et al. (2010) Avoidance behaviors and negative psychological responses in the general population in the initial stage of the H1N1 pandemic in Hong Kong. BMC Infectious Diseases10(1): 139.
34.
LewisADuchR (2021) Gender differences in perceived risk of COVID-19. Social Science Quarterly102(5): 2124–2133.
35.
LiuXLuoW-TLiY, et al. (2020) Psychological status and behavior changes of the public during the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Infectious Diseases of Poverty9(1): 58.
36.
LiYLuanSLiY, et al. (2022) Does risk perception motivate preventive behavior during a pandemic? A longitudinal study in the United States and China. American Psychologist77(1): 111–123.
O’SheaBAUedaM (2021) Who is more likely to ignore experts’ advice related to COVID-19?Preventive Medicine Reports23: 101470. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101470.
PaakkariLOkanO (2020) COVID-19: Health literacy is an underestimated problem. Lancet Public Health5(5): e249–e250.
41.
PentzoldCFechnerDJZuberC (2021) “Flatten the curve”: Data-driven projections and the journalistic brokering of knowledge during the COVID-19 crisis. Digital Journalism9(9): 1367–1390.
42.
PortnoyDBFerrerRABergmanHE, et al. (2013) Changing deliberative and affective responses to health risk: a meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 8(3): 296–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2013.798829
43.
PicklesKCoppTMeyerowitz-KatzG, et al. (2022) COVID-19 vaccine misperceptions in a community sample of adults aged 18–49 years in Australia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19(11): 6883.
44.
QianDLiO (2020) The relationship between risk event involvement and risk perception during the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Applied Psychology. Health and Well-Being12(4): 983–999.
45.
ReicherSDruryJ (2021) Pandemic fatigue? How adherence to covid-19 regulations has been misrepresented and why it matters. BMJ372(8276): n137.
46.
R Foundation (2023) The R Project for Statistical Computing. Available at: https://www.r-project.org/ (accessed 2 August 2023).
47.
RomerDJamiesonKH (2020) Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S. Social Science & Medicine263: 113356. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113356.
48.
RoozenbeekJSchneiderCRDryhurstS, et al. (2020) Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world. Royal Society Open Science7(10): 201199. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201199.
SalariNHosseinian-FarAJalaliR, et al. (2020) Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Globalization and Health16(1): 57–11.
51.
SchmälzleRRennerBSchuppHT (2017) Health Risk Perception and Risk Communication. Policy Insights From the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4(2): 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732217720223
52.
SchneiderCRDryhurstSKerrJ, et al. (2021) COVID-19 risk perception: A longitudinal analysis of its predictors and associations with health protective behaviours in the United Kingdom. Journal of Risk Research24(3–4): 294–313.
53.
ScudellariM (2020) How the pandemic might play out in 2021 and beyond. Nature584(7819): 22–25.
54.
SegrinC (2000) Social skills deficits associated with depression. Clinical Psychology Review20(3): 379–403.
55.
SerpasDGIgnacioDA (2022) COVID-19 fear mediates the relationship between perceived risk and preventive behaviors: The moderating role of perceived effectiveness. Psychology and Health37(12): 1457–1470.
56.
SiegristMLuchsingerLBearthA (2021) The impact of trust and risk perception on the acceptance of measures to reduce COVID-19 cases. Risk Analysis41(5): 787–800.
57.
SommaAGialdiGFrauC, et al. (2022) COVID-19 pandemic preventive behaviors and causal beliefs among Italian community dwelling adults. Journal of Health Psychology27(3): 601–611.
58.
SpenceAPoortingaWPidgeonN (2012) The psychological distance of climate change: Psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis32(6): 957–972.
59.
SpitzerRLKroenkeKWilliamsJB, et al. (2006) A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Archive of Internal Medicine166(10): 1092–1097.
60.
StickleyAMatsubayashiTSuekiH, et al. (2020) COVID-19 preventive behaviours among people with anxiety and depressive symptoms: Findings from Japan. Public Health189: 91–93.
61.
TangFLiangJZhangH, et al. (2021) COVID-19 related depression and anxiety among quarantined respondents. Psychology and Health36(2): 164–178.
TropeYLibermanN (2010) Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review117(2): 440–463.
64.
Van ScoyLJSnyderBMillerEL, et al. (2022) ‘Us-versus-them’: Othering in COVID-19 public health behavior compliance. PLoS One17(1): e0261726, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0261726.
65.
WakeSWormwoodJSatputeAB (2020) The influence of fear on risk taking: A meta-analysis. Cognition & Emotion34(6): 1143–1159.
66.
WolfeKSirotaMClarkeADF (2021) Age differences in COVID-19 risk-taking, and the relationship with risk attitude and numerical ability. Royal Society Open Science8(9): 201445. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201445.
67.
WongCMLJensenO (2020) The paradox of trust: Perceived risk and public compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore. Journal of Risk Research23(7–8): 1021–1030.
68.
YanJKimSZhangSX, et al. (2021) Hospitality workers’ COVID-19 risk perception and depression: A contingent model based on transactional theory of stress model. International Journal of Hospitality Management95: 102935. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102935.
69.
YuanK-HBentlerPM (2000) 5. Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology30(1): 165–200.
70.
YueRPHLauBHPChanCLW, et al. (2022) Risk perception as a double-edged sword in policy compliance in COVID-19 pandemic? A two-phase evaluation from Hong Kong. Journal of Risk Research25(9): 1131–1145.
71.
ZewdieAMoseASahleT, et al. (2022) The health belief model’s ability to predict COVID-19 preventive behavior: A systematic review. Sage Open Medicine10. doi: 10.1177/20503121221113668.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
