This study investigated how the Brazilian population perceived the risk of COVID-19, people’s behavior in response to the pandemic, and trust in the health system in case of COVID-19 infection. The sample comprised 7430 Brazilian recruited through non-probability sampling. Association analysis was performed using logistic regression. The results revealed that the economically active population and those who lived with health professionals most perceived greater susceptibility to infection. In addition, the high severity of COVID-19 was more perceived by the elderly and by those who lived with individuals in high-risk groups.
AhorsuDKLinCYImaniV, et al. (2020) The fear of COVID-19 scale: Development and initial validation. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction27: 1–9. DOI: 10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8March2020.
2.
AlvesPC (2010) A teoria sociológica contemporânea. Da superdeterminação pela teoria à historicidade. Sociedade e Estado25(1): 15–31.
3.
AndersonRMHeesterbeekHKlinkenbergD, et al. (2020) How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic?Lancet395(10228): 931–934.
4.
ArmitageRNellumsLB (2020) COVID-19 and the consequences of isolating the elderly. The Lancet Public Health5: e256.
5.
AroraTGreyI (2020) Health behaviour changes during COVID-19 and the potential consequences: A mini-review. Journal of Health Psychology25(9): 1155–1163.
6.
AvenTBouderF (2020) The COVID-19 pandemic: How can risk science help?Journal of Risk Research23(7-8): 849–854.
7.
BavelJJVBaickerKBoggioPS, et al. (2020) Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour4: 460–471.
8.
BeckU (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: SAGE.
9.
BrisceseGLacerataNMacisM, et al. (2020) Compliance with COVID-19 social-distancing measures in Italy: The role of expectations and duration. NBER Working Paper Series 13092.
10.
CalisherCCarrollDColwellR, et al. (2020) Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting COVID-19. Lancet395(10226): e42–e43.
FlaxmanSMishraSGandyA, et al. (2020) Estimating the number of infections and the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in 11 European countries. Imperial College London. Epub ahead of print 2020. DOI: 10.25561/77731.
18.
GarrettL (2020) COVID-19: The medium is the message. Lancet395(10228): 942–943.
19.
GiddensA (1991) As Consequências da Modernidade. São Paulo: Unesp.
20.
GiordaniRCGioloSRMuhlC, et al. (2021b) Psychometric evaluation of the Portuguese version of the FCV-19 scale and assessment of Fear of COVID-19 in a southern Brazilian population. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment31(1-4): 145–153.
21.
GiordaniRCFDonasoloJPGAmesVDB, et al. (2021a) The science between the infodemic and other post-truth narratives: Challenges during the pandemic. Ciencia & Saude Coletiva26(7): 2863–2872.
22.
GiordaniRCFZanoni da SilvaMMuhlC, et al. (2020) Fear of COVID-19 scale: Assessing Fear of the Coronavirus pandemic in Brazil. Journal of Health Psychology16: 1359105320982035. DOI: 10.1177/1359105320982035December2020.
HashmiFKIqbalQHaqueN, et al. (2020) Religious cliché and stigma: A brief response to overlooked barriers in COVID-19 management. Journal of Religion and Health59: 2697–2700.
HenriquesCMPVasconcelosW (2020) Crises dentro da crise: Respostas, incertezas e desencontros no combate à pandemia da Covid-19 no Brasil. Estudos Avançados34(99): 25–44.
27.
MoscoviciS (2015) Representações Sociais: Investigações Em Psicologia Social. Petrópolis: Vozes.
28.
NagleJ (2009) The Idea of Pollution. South Bend: UC Davis Law Review.
29.
PoortingaWPidgeonNF (2003) Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Analysis23(5): 961–972.
30.
PowerK (2020) The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the care burden of women and families. Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy16(1): 67–73.
31.
QuallsNLevittAKanadeN, et al. (2017) Community mitigation guidelines to prevent pandemic influenza - United States, 2017. MMWR Recommendations and Reports66: 1–34.
32.
RababaMHayajnehAABani-IssW (2021) Association of Death Anxiety with spiritual well-being and religious coping in older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Religion and Health60(1): 50–63.
33.
R Core Team (2020) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
34.
ScribanoA (2020a) La guerra de las curvas: Pandemia, sensibilidades y estructuración social. Simbiotica7(1): 53–68.
SommaAGialdiGFrauC, et al. (2020) COVID-19 pandemic preventive behaviors and causal beliefs among Italian community dwelling adults. Journal of Health Psychology. Epub ahead of print 2020. 1359105320962243. DOI: 10.1177/1359105320962243.
37.
SpiroME (1968) Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Mary Douglas. American Anthropologist70: 391–393.
38.
WardmanJKMythenG (2016) “Risk communication: Against the gods or against all odds? Problems and prospects of accounting for black swans. Journal of Risk Research19(10): 1220–1230.
39.
WongCMLJensenO (2020) The paradox of trust: Perceived risk and public compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore. Journal of Risk Research23(7-8): 1021–1030.
