Risk perception of COVID-19: Susceptibility and severity perceived by the Brazilian population

Abstract

This study investigated how the Brazilian population perceived the risk of COVID-19, people’s behavior in response to the pandemic, and trust in the health system in case of COVID-19 infection. The sample comprised 7430 Brazilian recruited through non-probability sampling. Association analysis was performed using logistic regression. The results revealed that the economically active population and those who lived with health professionals most perceived greater susceptibility to infection. In addition, the high severity of COVID-19 was more perceived by the elderly and by those who lived with individuals in high-risk groups.

Keywords

collective behavior COVID-19 pandemics risk perception social behavior

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahorsu

Lin

Imani

, et al. (2020) The fear of COVID-19 scale: Development and initial validation. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 27: 1–9. DOI: 10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8March 2020.

Alves

(2010) A teoria sociológica contemporânea. Da superdeterminação pela teoria à historicidade. Sociedade e Estado 25(1): 15–31.

Anderson

Heesterbeek

Klinkenberg

, et al. (2020) How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? Lancet 395(10228): 931–934.

Armitage

Nellums

(2020) COVID-19 and the consequences of isolating the elderly. The Lancet Public Health 5: e256.

Arora

Grey

(2020) Health behaviour changes during COVID-19 and the potential consequences: A mini-review. Journal of Health Psychology 25(9): 1155–1163.

Aven

Bouder

(2020) The COVID-19 pandemic: How can risk science help? Journal of Risk Research 23(7-8): 849–854.

Bavel

JJV

Baicker

Boggio

, et al. (2020) Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour 4: 460–471.

Beck

(1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: SAGE.

Briscese

Lacerata

Macis

, et al. (2020) Compliance with COVID-19 social-distancing measures in Italy: The role of expectations and duration. NBER Working Paper Series 13092.

10.

Calisher

Carroll

Colwell

, et al. (2020) Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting COVID-19. Lancet 395(10226): e42–e43.

11.

Center for Disease Control and Prevention (USA) (2019) Implementation of mitigation strategies for communities with local Covid-19 transmission. Washington, D.C. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/downloads/community-mitigation-strategy.pdf.

12.

CEPEDES/ENSP/FIOCRUZ (2020) A gestão de riscos e governança na pandemia por COVID-19 no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro. Available at: https://portal.fiocruz.br/sites/portal.fiocruz.br/files/documentos/relatoriocepedes-isolamento-social-outras-medidas.pdf.

13.

Chung

(2020) “Return of the 1950s housewife? How to stop Coronavirus lockdown reinforcing sexist gender roles.” The conversation, March 30. Available at: https://theconversation.com/return-of-the-1950s-housewife-how-to-stop-coronavirus-lockdown-reinforcing-sexist-gender-roles-134851

14.

Collins

Florin

Renn

(2020) COVID-19 risk governance: Drivers, responses and lessons to be learned. Journal of Risk Research 23(7-8): 1073–1082.

15.

Dalgalarrondo

(2008) Psicopatologia E Semiologia Dos Transtornos Mentais. Porto Alegre: ArtMed.

16.

Fisher

(2020) “Coronavirus ‘Hits All the Hot Buttons’ for how we misjudge risk.” The New York Times, February 13, 2020, Sec. World. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/13/world/asia/coronavirus-risk-interpreter.html.

17.

Flaxman

Mishra

Gandy

, et al. (2020) Estimating the number of infections and the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in 11 European countries. Imperial College London. Epub ahead of print 2020. DOI: 10.25561/77731.

18.

Garrett

(2020) COVID-19: The medium is the message. Lancet 395(10228): 942–943.

19.

Giddens

(1991) As Consequências da Modernidade. São Paulo: Unesp.

20.

Giordani

Giolo

Muhl

, et al. (2021b) Psychometric evaluation of the Portuguese version of the FCV-19 scale and assessment of Fear of COVID-19 in a southern Brazilian population. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment 31(1-4): 145–153.

21.

Giordani

RCF

Donasolo

JPG

Ames

VDB

, et al. (2021a) The science between the infodemic and other post-truth narratives: Challenges during the pandemic. Ciencia & Saude Coletiva 26(7): 2863–2872.

22.

Giordani

RCF

Zanoni da Silva

Muhl

, et al. (2020) Fear of COVID-19 scale: Assessing Fear of the Coronavirus pandemic in Brazil. Journal of Health Psychology 16: 1359105320982035. DOI: 10.1177/1359105320982035December 2020.

23.

Hale

Webster

(2020) Oxford COVID-19 government response tracker. Available at: https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/research-projects/oxford-covid-19-government-response-tracker.

24.

Hashmi

Iqbal

Haque

, et al. (2020) Religious cliché and stigma: A brief response to overlooked barriers in COVID-19 management. Journal of Religion and Health 59: 2697–2700.

25.

HDX - Humanitarian Data Exchange (n.d) Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) cases data. Available at: https://data.humdata.org/dataset/novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov-cases

26.

Henriques

CMP

Vasconcelos

(2020) Crises dentro da crise: Respostas, incertezas e desencontros no combate à pandemia da Covid-19 no Brasil. Estudos Avançados 34(99): 25–44.

27.

Moscovici

(2015) Representações Sociais: Investigações Em Psicologia Social. Petrópolis: Vozes.

28.

Nagle

(2009) The Idea of Pollution. South Bend: UC Davis Law Review.

29.

Poortinga

Pidgeon

(2003) Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Analysis 23(5): 961–972.

30.

Power

(2020) The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the care burden of women and families. Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy 16(1): 67–73.

31.

Qualls

Levitt

Kanade

, et al. (2017) Community mitigation guidelines to prevent pandemic influenza - United States, 2017. MMWR Recommendations and Reports 66: 1–34.

32.

Rababa

Hayajneh

Bani-Iss

(2021) Association of Death Anxiety with spiritual well-being and religious coping in older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Religion and Health 60(1): 50–63.

33.

R Core Team (2020) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

34.

Scribano

(2020a) La guerra de las curvas: Pandemia, sensibilidades y estructuración social. Simbiotica 7(1): 53–68.

35.

Scribano

(2020b) Teoría social y políticas de Las sensibilidades En tiempos de Pandemia. Buenos aires: Estudios sociologicos editora. Available at: http://estudiosociologicos.org/portal/teoria-social-y-politicas-de-las-sensibilidades-de-adrian-scribano/.

36.

Somma

Gialdi

Frau

, et al. (2020) COVID-19 pandemic preventive behaviors and causal beliefs among Italian community dwelling adults. Journal of Health Psychology. Epub ahead of print 2020. 1359105320962243. DOI: 10.1177/1359105320962243.

37.

Spiro

(1968) Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Mary Douglas. American Anthropologist 70: 391–393.

38.

Wardman

Mythen

(2016) “Risk communication: Against the gods or against all odds? Problems and prospects of accounting for black swans. Journal of Risk Research 19(10): 1220–1230.

39.

Wong

CML

Jensen

(2020) The paradox of trust: Perceived risk and public compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore. Journal of Risk Research 23(7-8): 1021–1030.