Utilizing the components of the protection motivation theory, this study investigated the role of close others’ diagnosis of COVID-19 (as a vicarious experience) in individuals’ adherence to protective behavior against COVID-19. Path analysis of online survey data from 3695 participants showed that the presence of a diagnosed close other was positively related to perceived vulnerability, while being negatively related to perceived response efficacy and self-efficacy. In addition, perceived severity and efficacy appraisals were positively associated with protective behavioral tendencies. Although efficacy appraisal mediated the relationship between vicarious experience and protective behavior, threat appraisal did not mediate this relationship. In sum, the results suggest that efficacy appraisal derived from vicarious experiences can be more consequential for protective behaviors than threat appraisal. Implications of these results on future large-scale health crises are discussed along with limitations and future directions.
AronAAronEN (1997) Self-expansion motivation and including other in the self. In: DuckS (ed.) Handbook of Personal Relationships: Theory, Research and Interventions, 2nd edn.Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, pp.251–270.
2.
AshfordSEdmundsJFrenchDP (2010) What is the best way to change self-efficacy to promote lifestyle and recreational physical activity? A systematic review with meta-analysis. British Journal of Health Psychology15(Pt 2): 265–288.
3.
BanduraA (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review84: 191–215.
4.
BanduraA (1997) Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: Freeman.
5.
BartschRACaseKAMeermanH (2012) Increasing academic self-efficacy in statistics with a live vicarious experience presentation. Teaching of Psychology39(2): 133–136.
6.
BaruhLÇarkoğluAYıldırımK, et al. (2020) The influence of reading newspaper and social media usage on individuals’ COVID-19 protective behavioral tendencies. Report no. 120K438, The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey. Available at: https://covid19media.ku.edu.tr (accessed 20 October 2023).
7.
BashirianSJenabiEKhazaeiS, et al (2020) Factors associated with preventive behaviours of COVID-19 among hospital staff in Iran in 2020: An application of the Protection Motivation Theory. Journal of Hospital Infection105(3): 430–433.
8.
BoltonDGillettG (2019) The Biopsychosocial Model of Health and Disease: New Philosophical and Scientific Developments. Wellcome Trust–Funded Monographs and Book Chapters. Cham: Palgrave Pivot. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK552029/ (accessed 14 May 2023).
9.
BotzenWJWDuijndamSJRobinsonPJ, et al (2022) Behavioral biases and heuristics in perceptions of COVID-19 risks and prevention decisions. Risk Analysis42: 2671–2690.
10.
ChambersSHammondsF (2014) Vicariously learned helplessness: The role of perceived dominance and prestige of a model. The Journal of General Psychology141(3): 280–295.
11.
De PelsmackerPLewiMCaubergheV (2017) The effect of personal characteristics, perceived threat, efficacy and breast cancer anxiety on breast cancer screening activation. Healthcare5(4): 4.
12.
DowningSTMccartyRJGuastelloAD, et al (2023) Assessing the predictors of adaptive and maladaptive covid-19 preventive behaviours: An application of protection motivation theory. Psychology Health & Medicine28(2): 460–474.
13.
EngelGL (1977) The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science196(4286): 129–136.
FariasJPilatiR (2022) Violating social distancing amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Psychological factors to improve compliance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology52(4): 233–245.
16.
FriemelTNGeberS (2023) Social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland: Health protective behavior in the context of communication and perceptions of efficacy, norms, and threat. Health Communication38(4): 779–789.
17.
FullertonMKRabbNMamidipakaS, et al (2022) Evidence against risk as a motivating driver of COVID-19 preventive behaviors in the United States. Journal of Health Psychology27(9): 2129–2146.
18.
GuanMLiYScolesJD, et al (2023) COVID-19 message fatigue: How does it predict preventive behavioral intentions and what types of information are people tired of hearing about?Health Communication38(8): 1631–1640.
19.
HansonCLCrandallABarnesMD, et al (2021) Protection motivation during COVID-19: A cross-sectional study of family health, media, and economic influences. Health Education & Behavior48(4): 434–445.
20.
HenrichJHeineSJNorenzayanA (2010) The weirdest people in the world?Behavioral and Brain Sciences33(2–3): 61–83.
21.
JørgensenFBorAPetersenMB (2021) Compliance without fear: Individual-level protective behaviour during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Health Psychology26(2): 679–696.
22.
KimYChungSSoJ (2020) Success expectancy: A mediator of the effects of source similarity and self-efficacy on health behavior intention. Health Communication35(9): 1063–1072.
23.
KotheEJLingMNorthM, et al (2019) Protection motivation theory and pro-environmental behaviour: A systematic mapping review. Australian Journal of Psychology71(4): 411–432.
24.
LiFLuoSMuW, et al (2021) Effects of sources of social support and resilience on the mental health of different age groups during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Psychiatry21(1): 16.
25.
LiZGeJYangM, et al (2020) Vicarious traumatization in the general public, members, and non-members of medical teams aiding in COVID-19 control. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity88: 916–919.
26.
LüdeckeDvon Dem KnesebeckO (2020) Protective behavior in course of the COVID-19 outbreak—Survey results from Germany. Frontiers in Public Health8: 572561.
27.
MadduxJERogersRW (1983) Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology19(5): 469–479.
28.
MattinglyBALewandowskiGW (2013) An expanded self is a more capable self: The association between self-concept size and self-efficacy. Self and Identity12(6): 621–634.
29.
NormanPBoerHSeydelE, et al (2015) Protection motivation theory. In: ConnerMNormanP (eds) Predicting and Changing Health Behaviour: Research and Practice With Social Cognition Models. Maidenhead, Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education, pp.70–106.
30.
PerlisRGuoZGreenJ, et al (2022) The COVID States Project #84: COVID-19 deaths and depression. OSF Preprints. Available at: https://osf.io/hcauf/ (accessed 5 December 2022).
31.
PlotnikoffRCTrinhLCourneyaKS, et al (2009) Predictors of aerobic physical activity and resistance training among Canadian adults with type 2 diabetes: An application of the Protection Motivation Theory. Psychology of Sport and Exercise10(3): 320–328.
32.
Qualtrics (2020) Provo, Utah, USA. Available at: https://www.qualtrics.com (accessed 20 October 2023).
33.
RogersRW (1975) A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change1. The Journal of Psychology91(1): 93–114.
SalgadoSBerntsenD (2021) “It won’t happen to us”: Unrealistic optimism affects COVID-19 risk assessments and attitudes regarding protective behaviour. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition10(3): 368–380.
36.
SalmaniBPrapavessisH (2023) Using a protection motivation theory framework to reduce vaping intention and behaviour in Canadian university students who regularly vape: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Health Psychology28(9): 832–845.
37.
SandGBristleJ (2022) Motivating protective behavior against COVID-19: Fear versus hope. Journal of Aging and Health. Epub ahead of print 17 June 2022. DOI: 10.1177/08982643221089427.
38.
ScholzUFreundAM (2021) Determinants of protective behaviours during a nationwide lockdown in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Health Psychology26(3): 935–957.
39.
SchunkDH (2003) Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading and Writing Quarterly19(2): 159–172.
40.
SenCKNBaruhLKumkaleGT (2016) Beyond a paycheck: The influence of workforce participation on women’s cancer screening in Turkey. Sex Roles75(11–12): 599–611.
41.
SheeranPHarrisPREptonT (2014) Does heightening risk appraisals change people’s intentions and behavior? A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Psychological Bulletin140: 511–543.
42.
SheeranPMakiAMontanaroE, et al (2016) The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology35: 1178–1188.
43.
SimonovASacherSDubéJ-P, et al (2022) Frontiers: The persuasive effect of Fox News: Noncompliance with social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic. Marketing Science41(2): 230–242.
44.
TannenbaumMBHeplerJZimmermanRS, et al (2015) Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychological Bulletin141: 1178–1204.
45.
TunçgençBEl ZeinMSulikJ, et al (2021) Social influence matters: We follow pandemic guidelines most when our close circle does. British Journal of Psychology112(3): 763–780.
46.
TURKSTAT (2020a) Elderly statistics.
47.
TURKSTAT (2020b) The results of address based population registration system, 2020.
48.
TURKSTAT (2021c) Attained education level by provinces (15 years of age and over).
49.
UsherELPajaresF (2009) Sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A validation study. Contemporary Educational Psychology34(1): 89–101.
50.
WarnerLMSchüzBWolffJK, et al (2014) Sources of self-efficacy for physical activity. Health Psychology33: 1298–1308.
51.
WarnerLMSchwarzerR (2020) Self-efficacy and health. In: SweenyKRobbinsMLCohenLM (eds) The Wiley Encyclopedia of Health Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp.605–613. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119057840.ch111 (accessed 14 May 2023).
52.
WilliamsLRasmussenSKleczkowskiA, et al (2015) Protection motivation theory and social distancing behaviour in response to a simulated infectious disease epidemic. Psychology Health & Medicine20(7): 832–837.
ZhangJCentolaD (2019) Social networks and health: New developments in diffusion, online and offline. The Annual Review of Sociology45(1): 91–109.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
