COVID-19 has become one of the top global health concerns. The present research examined the relationship between media use and protective behavior. The moderating role of SARS memory was also examined. A cross-sectional study found that media use was associated with more protective behaviors (i.e. preventive behavior, and avoidant behavior). We further found that SARS memory moderated the association between media use and avoidant behavior. Moreover, the moderating role of SARS memory on the relationship between daily media use and daily protective behavior was again tested using a daily design in Study 2. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
AlbaJWHutchinsonJW (1987) Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research13: 411–454.
2.
AlterALOppenheimerDM (2009) Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review13: 219–235.
3.
AndersenJPSilverRCStewartB, et al (2013) Psychological and physiological responses following repeated peer death. PLoS One8(9): e75881.
4.
AsgharMZArifSBarberaE, et al (2021) Support through social media and online class participation to enhance psychological resilience. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health18: 11962.
5.
AsgharMZArifSIqbalJ, et al (2022) Social media tools for the development of pre-service health sciences researchers during COVID-19 in Pakistan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19: 581.
6.
BishAMichieS (2010) Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A review. British Journal of Health Psychology15: 797–824.
7.
BornsteinRFD’AgostinoPR (1992) Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology63(4): 545–552.
8.
ChaoMXueDLiuT, et al (2020) Media use and acute psychological outcomes during COVID-19 outbreak in China. Journal of Anxiety Disorders74: 102248.
9.
EisingaRGrotenhuisMPelzerB (2013) The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?International Journal of Public Health58(4): 637–642.
10.
FazioLKBrashierNMPayneBK, et al (2015) Knowledge does not protect against illusory truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology General144: 993–1002.
11.
GarfinDRHolmanEASilverRC (2015) Cumulative exposure to prior collective trauma and acute stress responses to the Boston Marathon bombings. Psychological Science26(6): 675–683.
12.
GriffinRJDunwoodySNeuwirthK (1999) Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. Environmental Research80: S230–S245.
13.
HasherLGoldsteinDToppinoT (1977) Frequency and the conference of referential validity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior16: 107–112.
14.
HofmannDAGriffinMAGavinMB (2000) The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In: KleinKKozlowskiS (eds) Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp.467–511.
15.
HolmanEAGarfinDRSilverRC (2014) Media’s role in broadcasting acute stress following the Boston Marathon bombings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111(1): 93–98.
16.
LauJTFYangXTsuiH, et al (2003) Monitoring community responses to the SARS epidemic in Hong Kong: From day 10 to day 62. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health57(11): 864–870.
17.
LehmannEYLehmannLS (2021) Responding to patients who refuse to wear masks during the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of General Internal Medicine36: 2814–2815.
18.
LiHSongYXieX (2020) Altruistic or selfish? Responses when safety is threatened depend on childhood socioeconomic status. European Journal of Social Psychology50: 1001–1016.
19.
LimXYYapACMahendranR, et al (2021) The interplay between anxiety, fear, protective behaviors, compassion, and resilience among older adults during a COVID-19 lockdown: A structural equation modeling study. Translational Behavioral Medicine11: 1172–1178.
20.
LinCALagoeC (2013) Effects of news media and interpersonal interactions on H1N1 risk perception and vaccination intent. Communication Research Reports30(2): 127–136.
21.
LüdeckeDvon Dem KnesebeckO (2020) Protective behavior in course of the COVID-19 outbreak: Survey results from Germany. Frontiers in Public Health8: 572561.
22.
McLaughlinKAConronKJKoenenKC, et al (2010) Childhood adversity, adult stressful life events, and risk of past-year psychiatric disorder: A test of the stress sensitization hypothesis in a population-based sample of adults. Psychological Medicine40: 1647–1658.
23.
MuthénLKMuthénBO (1998–2015) Mplus User’s Guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.
24.
NgYJYangZJVishwanathA (2018) To fear or not to fear? Applying the social amplification of risk framework on two environmental health risks in Singapore. Journal of Risk Research21(12): 1487–1501.
25.
PennycookGCannonTDRandDG (2018) Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. Journal of Experimental Psychology General147(12): 1865–1880.
26.
PennycookGRandDG (2020) Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. Journal of Personality88: 185–200.
27.
PfefferbaumBNewmanENelsonSD, et al (2014) Disaster media coverage and psychological outcomes: Descriptive findings in the extant research. Current Psychiatry Reports16: 464.
28.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJY, et al (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
29.
PratiGPietrantoniLZaniB (2011) A social-cognitive model of pandemic influenza H1N1 risk perception and recommended behaviors in Italy. Risk Analysis31(4): 645–656.
30.
RenWZhuXHuY (2021) Differential effects of traditional and social media use on COVID-19 preventive behaviors: The mediating role of risk and efficacy perceptions. Journal of Health Psychology. 27(8): 1861–1874.
31.
SadafRA (2014) Trust, credibility and authenticity: Race and its effect on audience perceptions of news information from traditional and alternative sources. PhD Thesis, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
32.
SeoM (2021) Amplifying panic and facilitating prevention: Multifaceted effects of traditional and social media use during the 2015 MERS crisis in South Korea. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly98(1): 221–240.
33.
ShiKFanHJiaJ, et al (2003) The risk perceptions of SARS and socio-psychological behaviors of urban people in China. Acta Psychologica Sinica35(4): 546–554.
34.
SingerJDWillettJB (2003) Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
TannerAFriedmanDBKoskanA, et al (2009) Disaster communication on the Internet: A focus on mobilizing information. Journal of Health Communication14: 741–755.
36.
TerryDLMathewsDP (2022) Social norms and engagement in protective health behaviors among rural health providers. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings. 29: 384–390.
37.
ValkenburgPMPeterJ (2013) The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication63(2): 221–243.
38.
VosSCBucknerMM (2016) Social media messages in an emerging health crisis: Tweeting bird flu. Journal of Health Communication21(3): 301–308.
39.
World Health Organization (2022) WHO coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard. Available at: https://covid19.who.int/ (accessed 12 February 2022).
40.
WuYShenF (2022) Exploring the impacts of media use and media trust on health behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Journal of Health Psychology27(6): 1445–1461.
41.
XieXFZhengRXieDM, et al (2005) Analysis on psychological panic phenomenon of SARS. Acta Scicentiarum Naturalum Universitis Pekinesis41(4): 628–639.
42.
XuMZhengRRaoL, et al (2020) Proposals for coping with “Psychological Typhoon Eye” effect detected in COVID-19. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences35(3): 273–282.
43.
YooWChoiDHParkK (2016) The effects of SNS communication: How expressing and receiving information predict MERS-preventive behavioral intentions in South Korea. Computers in Human Behavior62: 34–43.
44.
ZhangLKongYChangH (2015) Media use and health behavior in H1N1 flu crisis: The mediating role of perceived knowledge and fear. Atlantic Journal of Communication23(2): 67–80.
45.
ZhangNYangHHongD, et al (2022) Risk perception, self-efficacy, lay theories of health, and engagement in health-protective behaviors among hospital pharmacists during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine29(2): 247–252.
46.
ZhaoNZhouG (2020) Social media use and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Moderator role of disaster stressor and mediator role of negative affect. Applied Psychology. Health and Well-Being12(4): 1019–1038.
47.
ZhengLMiaoMGanY (2020) Perceived control buffers the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on general health and life satisfaction: The mediating role of psychological distance. Applied Psychology. Health and Well-Being12: 1095–1114.
48.
ZhouHYangJZhouC, et al (2021) A review of SARS-CoV2: Compared with SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. Frontiers of Medicine8: 628370.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
