The study explored how traditional and social media use produced various cognitive responses toward COVID-19, including perceived severity, susceptibility, and efficacy, and direct and indirect facilitation of COVID-19 preventive behaviors. We tested the hypotheses on data collected from 433 university students in Wuhan, China, using structural equation modeling. We found that traditional media enhanced engagement for preventive behaviors both directly and indirectly by enhancing perceived severity and efficacy, whereas social media showed no impact on preventive behaviors, either directly or indirectly. Furthermore, the direct effect of traditional media on preventive behaviors was markedly stronger than the indirect effect through perceptions.
AroraTGreyI (2020) Health behaviour changes during COVID-19 and the potential consequences: A mini-review. Journal of Health Psychology25(9): 1155–1163.
2.
BanduraA (1990) Perceived self-efficacy in the exercise of control over AIDS infection. Evaluation and Program Planning13(1): 9–17.
3.
BanduraA (1998) Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychology and Health13(4): 623–649.
4.
BishAMichieS (2010) Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviors during a pandemic: A review. British Journal of Health Psychology15(4): 797–824.
ChaeJLeeC (2019) The psychological mechanism underlying communication effects on behavioral intention: Focusing on affect and cognition in the cancer context. Communication Research46(5): 597–618.
7.
ChanMPWinnegKMHawkinsL, et al. (2018) Legacy and social media respectively influence risk perceptions and protective behaviors during emerging health threats: A multi-wave analysis of communications on Zika virus cases. Social Science & Medicine212 (June): 50–59.
8.
ChangC (2012) News coverage of health-related issues and its impacts on perceptions: Taiwan as an example. Health Communication27(2): 111–123.
9.
ChenLShiJGuoY, et al. (2019) Agenda-setting on traditional vs social media: An analysis of haze-related content grounded in the extended parallel process model. Internet Research29(4): 688–703.
10.
ChoiDHYooWNohGY, et al. (2017) The impact of social media on risk perceptions during the MERS outbreak in South Korea. Computers in Human Behavior72: 422–431.
11.
de VreeseCHNeijensP (2016) Measuring media exposure in a changing communications environment. Communication Methods and Measures10(2–3): 69–80.
12.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18: 39–50.
13.
GerbnerGGrossLMorganM, et al. (2002). Growing up with television: Cultivation processes. In: BryantJZillmannD (eds.) Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.43–67.
14.
HairJFBlackWCBabinBJ, et al. (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th edn.New Jersey, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
15.
HongH (2011) An extension of the extended parallel process model (EPPM) in television health news: The influence of health consciousness on individual message processing and acceptance. Health Communication26(4): 343–353.
16.
HuLBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6: 1–55.
17.
JangKParkN (2018) The effects of repetitive information communication through multiple channels on prevention behavior during the 2015 MERS outbreak in South Korea. Journal of Health Communication23(7): 670–678.
18.
JaspalRFinoEBreakwellGM (2020) The COVID-19 Own Risk Appraisal Scale (CORAS): Development and validation in two samples from the United Kingdom. Journal of Health Psychology27(4):790–804.
19.
KellerJJKimJHLauJC, et al. (2014) Intention to engage in preventive behaviors in response to the A/H1N1 pandemic among University entrants in four Chinese cities. Asia–Pacific Journal of Public Health26(1): 42–47.
20.
LiangLGaoTRenH, et al. (2020) Post-traumatic stress disorder and psychological distress in Chinese youths following the COVID-19 emergency. Journal of Health Psychology25(9): 1164–1175.
21.
LinLSavoiaEAgboolaF, et al. (2014) What have we learned about communication inequalities during the H1N1 pandemic: A systematic review of the literature. BMC Public Health14(1): 484–484.
22.
LiuLXieJLiK, et al. (2020). Exploring how media influence preventive behavior and excessive preventive intention during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17(21): 79–90.
23.
MatiasTDominskiFHMarksDF (2020) Human needs in COVID-19 isolation. Journal of Health Psychology25(7): 871–882.
24.
NabiRLMyrickJG (2019) Uplifting fear appeals: Considering the role of hope in fear-based persuasive messages. Health Communication34(4): 463–474.
25.
NamS (2019) An application of the risk perception attitude framework in food safety behavior. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment25(4): 1034–1047.
26.
Nii-TrebiN (2017) Emerging and neglected infectious diseases: Insights, advances, and challenges. BioMed Research International4: 1–15.
27.
OhS-HLeeSYHanC (2020) The effects of social media use on preventive behaviors during infectious disease outbreaks: The mediating role of self-relevant emotions and public risk perception. Health Communication36(8): 972–981.
28.
PerseEM (2001) Media Effects and Society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29.
PeterAChenMCarrascoS (2016) Power interplay and newspaper digitization: Lessons from the Pengpai experiment. Global Media and China1(4): 497–510.
30.
RimalRNRealK (2005) How behaviors are influenced by perceived norms: A test of the theory of normative social behavior. Communication Research32(3): 389–414.
31.
RogersRW (1975) A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. The Journal of Psychology91(1): 93–114.
32.
RubinGJPottsHWMichieS (2010) The impact of communications about swine flu (influenza A H1N1v) on public responses to the outbreak: Results from 36 national telephone surveys in the UK. Health Technology Assessment14(34): 183–266.
33.
RuiterRAKesselsLTPetersG, et al. (2014) Sixty years of fear appeal research: current state of the evidence. International Journal of Psychology49(2): 63–70.
34.
SeoM (2019) Amplifying panic and facilitating prevention: Multifaceted effects of traditional and social media use during the 2015 MERS crisis in South Korea. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly98(1): 1–20.
35.
ShiJJSmithSW (2016) The effects of fear appeal message repetition on perceived threat, perceived efficacy, and behavioral intention in the extended parallel process model. Health Communication31(3): 275–286.
36.
SommaAGialdiGFrauC, et al. (2020) COVID-19 pandemic preventive behaviors and causal beliefs among Italian community dwelling adults. Journal of Health Psychology27(3): 601–611.
37.
VoorheesCMBradyMKCalantoneR, et al. (2016) Discriminant validity testing in marketing: An analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science44(1): 119–134.
38.
WeiRLoVChenKY, et al. (2020) Press systems, freedom of the press and credibility: A comparative analysis of mobile news in four Asian cities. Journalism Studies21(4): 530–546.
39.
WitteK (1992) Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communications Monographs59(4): 329–349.
YooW (2019) How risk communication via Facebook and Twitter shapes behavioral intentions: The case of fine dust pollution in South Korea, Journal of Health Communication24(7–8): 663–673.
42.
YooWChoiDHParkK (2016) The effects of SNS communication: How expressing and receiving information predict MERS-preventive behavioral intentions in South Korea. Computers in Human Behavior62: 34–43.
43.
YooWPaekH-JHoveT (2020) Differential effects of content-oriented versus user-oriented social media on risk perceptions and behavioral intentions. Health Communication35(1): 99–109.
44.
ZakaAShamlooSEFiorenteP, et al. (2020) COVID-19 pandemic as a watershed moment: A call for systematic psychological health care for frontline medical staff. Journal of Health Psychology25(7): 883–887.
45.
ZhangHZhouSShenB (2014) Public trust: A comprehensive investigation on perceived media credibility in China. Asian Journal of Communication24(2): 158–172.
46.
ZysbergLZisbergA (2020) Days of worry: Emotional intelligence and social support mediate worry in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Health Psychology27(2): 268–277.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
