This study (N = 1306) investigated the role behavioural immune system and specific beliefs in COVID-19 misinformation in predicting COVID-19 protective behaviours. By analysing the data from an online survey, we found that germ avoidance significantly predicted social distancing and was negatively correlated to transportation use. Belief in conspiracy theories and non-psychological cures and prevention methods were negatively associated to social distancing, while the latter also predicted lower preventive commodities purchasing. These findings suggested that germ aversion should be incorporated in the promotion of COVID-19 prevention behaviours and that any misinformation related to COVID-19 should be minimized to improve people’s protective behaviours.
AckermanJMHillSEMurrayDR (2018) The behavioral immune system: Current concerns and future directions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass12(2): 57–70. DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12371.
3.
AhmadzadehMGhamaraniASamadiM, et al. (2013) The investigation of validity and reliability of a scale of perceived vulnerability to disease in Iran. British Journal of Social Sciences1(4): 43–51. DOI: 10.13140/2.1.1370.1122.
4.
AllingtonDDuffyBWesselyS, et al. (2020) Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Psychological Medicine51(10): 1763–1769.
5.
AlperSBayrakFYilmazO (2020) Psychological correlates of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and preventive measures: Evidence from Turkey. Current Psychology40: 5708–5717.
AriyaniDTAuliaIFSuryobuwonoAA, et al. (2020) Switch potential of the users form using public transportation to private transportation as an impact of pandemic COVID-19 (case study in Jabodetabek 2020). 2. Available at: https://proceedings.itltrisakti.ac.id/index.php/ATLR/article/view/260 (accessed 9 June 2021).
BaruaZBaruaSAktarS, et al. (2020) Effects of misinformation on COVID-19 individual responses and recommendations for resilience of disastrous consequences of misinformation. Progress in Disaster Science8: 100119.
11.
BrothertonRFrenchCCPickeringAD (2013) Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Frontiers in Psychology4: 279.
12.
BrydenGMBrowneMRockloffM, et al. (2018) Anti-vaccination and pro-CAM attitudes both reflect magical beliefs about health. Vaccine36(9): 1227–1234.
13.
CasseseECFarhartCEMillerJM (2020) Gender differences in COVID-19 conspiracy theory beliefs. Politics & Gender16(4): 1009–1018.
14.
CoolicanH (2014) Research Methods and Statistics in Psychology. 6th ed.East Sussex: Psychology Pers.
15.
CoudercN (2007) GRUBBS: Stata module to perform Grubbs’ test for outliers. Boston College Department of Economics, 29January. Available at: https://ideas.repec.Org/c/boc/bocode/s456803.html (accessed 5 April 2021).
16.
De ConinckDd’HaenensLMatthijsK (2020) Perceived vulnerability to disease and attitudes towards public health measures: COVID-19 in Flanders, Belgium. Personality and Individual Differences166: 110220.
DíazRCovaF (2020) Reactance, morality, and disgust: The relationship between affective dispositions and compliance with official health recommendations during the COVID-19 pandemic. preprint, 14 April. PsyArXiv.
19.
DjalanteRLassaJSetiamargaD, et al. (2020) Review and analysis of current responses to COVID-19 in Indonesia: Period of January to March 2020. Progress in Disaster Science6: 100091.
20.
DuncanLASchallerMParkJH (2009) Perceived vulnerability to disease: Development and validation of a 15-item self-report instrument. Personality and Individual Differences47(6): 541–546.
21.
EarnshawVAEatonLAKalichmanSC, et al. (2020) COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs, health behaviors, and policy support. Translational Behavioral Medicine10(4): 850–856.
22.
Elfahmi, WoerdenbagHJKayserO (2014) Jamu: Indonesian traditional herbal medicine towards rational phytopharmacological use. Journal of Herbal Medicine4(2): 51–73.
23.
ErcegNRužojčićMGalićZ (2020) Misbehaving in the Corona crisis: The role of anxiety and unfounded beliefs. Current Psychology41: 5621–5630.
FaulFErdfelderEBuchnerA, et al. (2009) Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods41(4): 1149–1160.
26.
GrewBCollinsJCSchneiderCR, et al. (2020) How does perceived cost and value influence pharmacy patronage? A scoping review. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing14(4): 641–663.
27.
GutiérrezAMiravetDDomènechA (2020) COVID-19 and urban public transport services: Emerging challenges and research agenda. Cities & Health5(sup1): S177–S180.
28.
HamamuraTParkJH (2010) Regional differences in pathogen prevalence and defensive reactions to the “swine flu” outbreak among East Asians and Westerners. Evolutionary Psychology8(3): 506–515.
HillerJSchatzKDrexlerH (2017) Gender influence on health and risk behavior in primary prevention: A systematic review. Journal of Public Health25(4): 339–349.
32.
HornikRKikutAJeschE, et al. (2021) Association of COVID-19 misinformation with face mask wearing and social distancing in a nationally representative US sample. Health Communication36(1): 6–14.
33.
HudiyanaJPrawiraBKartikaD, et al. (2021) Gods, germs, and science: Unraveling the role of scientific literacy, germ aversion, and religious fundamentalism in predicting attitudes towards gays and lesbians. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology32(1): 87-108.
34.
ImhoffRLambertyP (2020) A bioweapon or a hoax? The link between distinct conspiracy beliefs about the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and pandemic behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science11(8): 1110–1118.
IslamMSSarkarTKhanSH, et al. (2020) COVID-19–related infodemic and its impact on public health: A global social media analysis. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene103(4): 1621–1629.
37.
JASP Team (2019) JASP. JASP.
38.
LewandowskySEckerUKHSeifertCM, et al. (2012) Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest13(3): 106–131.
39.
MakhanovaAShepherdMA (2020) Behavioral immune system linked to responses to the threat of COVID-19. Personality and Individual Differences167: 110221.
40.
MurphyKWilliamsonHSargeantE, et al. (2020) Why people comply with Covid-19 social distancing restrictions: Self-interest or duty?Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology53(4): 477–496.
41.
MurrayDRSchallerM (2010) Historical prevalence of infectious diseases within 230 geopolitical regions: A tool for investigating origins of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology41(1): 99–108.
42.
MurrayDRSchallerM (2016) The behavioral immune system: Implications for social cognition. In: OlsonJMZannaPM (eds) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1st edn. Elsevier: USA, pp.75–129.
43.
NasirNMBaequniBNurmansyahMI (2020) Misinformation related to COVID-19 in Indonesia. Jurnal Administrasi Kesehatan Indonesia8(2): 51.
44.
NiburskiKNiburskiO (2020) Impact of Trump’s promotion of unproven COVID-19 treatments on social media and subsequent internet trends: Observational study. Journal of Medical Internet Research22(11): e20044.
Nurrachmi ISetiawanSaripudinU (2021) Consumer Behavior and Patterns During the Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Science, Technology, Engineering and Industrial Revolution (ICSTEIR 2020), 536(Icsteir 2020), pp. 23–27.
47.
Pasay-AnE (2020) Exploring the vulnerability of frontline nurses to COVID-19 and its impact on perceived stress. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences15(5): 404–409.
48.
PedersenMJFaveroN (2020) Social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: Who are the present and future noncompliers?Public Administration Review80(5): 805–814.
49.
PellegrinoRCrandallPGSeoH-S (2016) Using olfaction and unpleasant reminders to reduce the intention-behavior gap in hand washing. Scientific Reports6(1): 18890.
50.
PummererLBöhmRLilleholtL, et al. (2020) Conspiracy theories and their societal effects during the COVID-19 pandemic. preprint, 14 April. PsyArXiv.
51.
RomerDJamiesonKH (2020) Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S. Social Science & Medicine263: 113356.
52.
RoozenbeekJSchneiderCRDryhurstS, et al. (2020) Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world. Royal Society Open Science7(10): 201199.
53.
RoserMRitchieHOrtiz-OspinaE, et al. (2020) Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) – statistics and research – our world in data. Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus (accessed 5 April 2021).
54.
RosseelY (2012) lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software48(1): 1–36.
Satuan Tugas Penanganan COVID-19 (2021) Peta Sebaran COVID-19 [COVID-19 Distribution Map]. Available at: https://covid19.go.id/peta-sebaran (accessed 25 February 2021).
58.
SchallerM (2011) The behavioural immune system and the psychology of human sociality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences366(1583): 3418–3426.
59.
SchallerMMurrayDRBangerterA (2015) Implications of the behavioural immune system for social behaviour and human health in the modern world. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences370(1669): 20140105.
60.
ShenJDuanHZhangB, et al. (2020) Prevention and control of COVID-19 in public transportation: Experience from China. Environmental Pollution266: 115291.
61.
ShookNJSeviBLeeJ, et al. (2020) Disease avoidance in the time of COVID-19: The behavioral immune system is associated with concern and preventative health behaviors. PLoS One15(8): 1–15.
62.
SwamiVBarronD (2020) Analytic thinking, rejection of coronavirus (COVID-19) conspiracy theories, and compliance with mandated social-distancing: Direct and indirect relationships in a nationally representative sample of adults in the United Kingdom. preprint, 16 April. Open Science Framework.
van RooijBde BruijnALReinders FolmerC, et al. (2020) Compliance with COVID-19 mitigation measures in the United States. SSRN Electronic Journal. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3582626.
68.
VerbekeWSioenIPieniakZ, et al. (2005) Consumer perception versus scientific evidence about health benefits and safety risks from fish consumption. Public Health Nutrition8(4): 422–429.
WoodMJDouglasKMSuttonRM (2012) Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science3(6): 767–773.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
