Using data from two studies conducted among diverse undergraduate students, we assessed the scalar structure of the Explicit Discrimination Scale (EDS), and developed an abridged version of the instrument. Our findings suggest that the EDS has acceptable scalability properties, including an adequate dispersion of items along the latent trait continuum. Results also support the idea that increasing raw scale scores reflect higher intensities of perceived discrimination. This shortened version of the EDS may be used in large-scale studies on the health impacts of discrimination.
BastosJLCelesteRKFaersteinE, et al. (2010) Racial discrimination and health: A systematic review of scales with a focus on their psychometric properties. Social Science and Medicine70(7): 1091–1099.
4.
BastosJLFaersteinECelesteRK, et al. (2012) Explicit discrimination and health: Development and psychometric properties of an assessment instrument. Revista de Saúde Pública46(2): 269–278.
5.
BastosJLGoncalvesHFaersteinE, et al. (2010) Experiences of discrimination among university students in the city of Rio de Janeiro. Revista de Saúde Pública44(1): 28–38.
6.
BastosJLHarnoisCE (2020) Does the Everyday Discrimination Scale generate meaningful cross-group estimates? A psychometric evaluation. Social Science and Medicine265: 113321.
7.
BastosJLHarnoisCEBernardoCO, et al. (2017) When does differential treatment become perceived discrimination? An intersectional analysis in a southern Brazilian population. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity3(3): 301–318.
8.
BastosJLReichenheimMECelesteRK, et al. (2019) Perceived discrimination south of the equator: Reassessing the Brazilian Explicit Discrimination Scale. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology25(3): 413–423.
9.
BernardoFRBastosJLMoretti-PiresRO (2018) Dancing with numbers: Measuring experiences with discrimination among multiply marginalized groups. Cadernos de Saúde Pública34(11): e00167117–e00167117.
10.
BirnbaumA (1968) Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In: LordFMNovickMR (eds) Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading: Addison-Wesley, pp.395–479.
11.
BurgardSCastiglioneDPLinKY, et al. (2017) Differential reporting of discriminatory experiences in Brazil and the United States. Cadernos de Saúde Pública33(S1): e00110516.
12.
FattoreGLTelesCASantosDN, et al. (2016) Validity of the Experiences of Discrimination scale in a Brazilian population. Cadernos de Saúde Pública32(4): e00102415.
13.
HardouinJ-BBonnaud-AntignacASébilleV (2011) Nonparametric item response theory using stata. The Stata Journal11(1): 30–51.
14.
HarnoisCEBastosJL (2018) Discrimination, harassment, and gendered health inequalities: Do perceptions of workplace mistreatment contribute to the gender gap in self-reported health?Journal of Health and Social Behavior59(2): 283–299.
15.
HarnoisCEBastosJL (2019) The promise and pitfalls of intersectional scale development. Social Science and Medicine223: 73–76.
16.
HarnoisCEBastosJLCampbellME, et al. (2019) Measuring perceived mistreatment across diverse social groups: An evaluation of the Everyday Discrimination Scale. Social Science and Medicine232: 298–306.
17.
HarnoisCEIfatunjiM (2011) Gendered measures, gendered models: Toward an intersectional analysis of interpersonal racial discrimination. Ethnic and Racial Studies34(6): 1006–1028.
18.
Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica e Aplicada (2012) Estudo comparado sobre a juventude brasileira e chinesa: Dados preliminares do Brasil. Brasília: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica e Aplicada.
19.
KriegerN (2020) Measures of racism, sexism, heterosexism, and gender binarism for health equity research: From structural injustice to embodied harm-an ecosocial analysis. Annual Review of Public Health41: 37–62.
20.
KriegerNSmithKNaishadhamD, et al. (2005) Experiences of discrimination: Validity and reliability of a self-report measure for population health research on racism and health. Social Science and Medicine61(7): 1576–1596.
21.
LandrineHKlonoffEA (1996) The schedule of racist events: A measure of racial discrimination and a study of its negative physical and mental health consequences. Journal of Black Psychology22(2): 144–168.
22.
MeadeAWJohnsonECBraddyPW (2008) Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology93(3): 568–592.
23.
MeijerRRBanekeJJ (2004) Analyzing psychopathology items: A case for nonparametric item response theory modeling. Psychological Methods9(3): 354–368.
24.
MokkinkLBTerweeCBPatrickDL, et al. (2010) The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research19(4): 539–549.
ParadiesYBenJDensonN, et al. (2015) Racism as a determinant of health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One10(9): e0138511.
27.
PascoeEASmart RichmanL (2009) Perceived discrimination and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin135(4): 531–554.
28.
R Core Team (2020) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
29.
ReichenheimMEBastosJL (2021) What, what for and how? Developing instruments for use in epidemiology. Revista de Saude Publica 54, forth.
30.
ReskinB (2012) The race discrimination system. Annual Review of Sociology38(1): 17–35.
31.
ScheimAIBauerGR (2019) The Intersectional Discrimination Index: Development and validation of measures of self-reported enacted and anticipated discrimination for intercategorical analysis. Social Science & Medicine226: 225–235.
32.
StataCorp (2019) Stata Statistical Software: Release 16. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.
33.
Van der LindenWJ (ed.) (2018) Handbook of Item Response Theory, Three Volume Set. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
34.
WilliamsDRLawrenceJADavisBA, et al. (2019) Understanding how discrimination can affect health. Health Services Research54(S2): 1374–1388.
35.
WilliamsDRYanYJacksonJS, et al. (1997) Racial differences in physical and mental health: Socio-economic status, stress and discrimination. Journal of Health Psychology2(3): 335–351.
36.
WilsonM (2005) Constructing Measures: An Item Response Modeling Approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
37.
YoonMLaiMHC (2018) Testing factorial invariance with unbalanced samples. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal25(2): 201–213.
38.
ZubaranCBalbinottiMCappellettiK, et al. (2020) The Portuguese version of the Schedule of Racist Events. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities7: 162–168.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
