Social adversity events commonly occur in our daily lives. However, an individual’s perception of social adversity experienced may be more important than actual events in impacting an individual’s psychological functioning and reactions. In the current study, we examined how individuals’ perception of social adversity events they experienced is associated with their traumatic stress symptoms as well as mood and anxiety symptoms using the Bayesian network model. The findings indicated that individuals with a perception of social adversity events as traumatic and frequent showed an increase in the probability of displaying a high level of posttraumatic stress symptoms.
BorsboomDCramerAOJ (2013) Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology9: 91–121.
2.
CastilloEGutoerreJMHadiAS (1997) Expert Systems and Probabilistic Network Models. New York, NY: Spinger-Verlag.
3.
CastonJSFrazierP (2013) Perceived control over traumatic events: A study across events. Paper presented at the National Conference on Undergraduate Research, April 11–13, University of Wisconsin La Crosse, WI.
4.
ChengJBellDALiuW (1997) An algorithm for Bayesian belief network construction from data. In: Proceedings of the sixth international workshop on artificial intelligence and statistics (AI and STAT), Fort Lauderdale, FL, pp. 83–90.
5.
ChickeringD (1995) A transformational characterization of equivalent Bayesian network structures. In: Proceedings of the 11th annual conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (UAI-95), San Francisco, CA, pp. 87–98.
6.
ClarkDABeckAT (2010) Cognitive theory and therapy of anxiety and depression: Convergence with neurobiological findings. Trends in Cognitive Sciences14(9): 418–424.
7.
ContractorAACaldasSFletcherS, et al. (2018) Empirically derived lifespan polytraumatization typologies: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Psychology74: 1137–1159.
8.
DanksDFancsaliSGlymourC, et al. (2010) Comorbid science?Behavior & Brain Science33: 153–154.
9.
DempsterALairdNRubinD (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B39: 1–38.
FriedmanNLinialMNachmanI, et al. (2000) Using Bayesian networks to analyze expression data. Paper presented at the proceedings of the fourth annual international conference on computational molecular biology, Tokyo, Japan.
12.
GilmanRCarter-SowellADeWallCN, et al. (2013) Validation of the ostracism experience scale for adolescents. Psychological Assessment25: 319–330.
13.
GreenBL (1996) Trauma history questionnaire. In: StammBH (ed.) Measurement of Stress, Trauma, and Adaptation. Lutherville, MD: Sidran Press, 366–369.
14.
HeckermanD (1998) A tutorial on learning with Bayesian networks. In JordanMI (ed.) Learning in Graphical Models. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer, 302–354.
15.
HodgdonHBSuvakMZinovievDY, et al. (2019) Network analysis of exposure to trauma and childhood adversities in a clinical sample of youth. Psychological Assessment31(11): 1294–1306.
16.
HolmesSCJohnsonNL (2019) Understanding the relationship between interpersonal trauma and disordered eating: An extension of the model of psychological adaptation. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. Epub ahead of print 2 December. DOI: 10.1037/tra0000533.
17.
KesslerD (2015) Capture: Unraveling the Mystery of Mental Suffering. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publisher.
18.
KjærulffUvan der GaagLC (2000) Making sensitivity analysis computationally efficient. Paper presented at the proceedings of the sixteenth annual conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (UAI 2000), Stanford, CA.
19.
KjærulffUBMadsenAL (2005) Probabilistic Networks: An Introduction to Bayesian Networks and Influence Diagrams. Aalborg University: HUGIN Expert A/S.
LauríaEJMDuchessiPJ (2006) A Bayesian belief network for IT implementation decision support. Decision Support Systems342: 1573–1588.
22.
LauritzenSL (1995) The EM algorithm for graphical association models with missing data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis19: 191–201.
23.
McIlveenRMitchellRCurranD, et al. (2019) Exploring the relationship between alienation appraisals, trauma, posttraumatic stress, and depression. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. Epub ahead of print 18 November. DOI: 10.1037/tra0000523.
PearlJ (1988) Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
26.
PearlJ (2000) Causality Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
27.
RussellSNorvigP (2009) Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 3rd edn.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28.
SartoriusNÜstünTBLecrubierY, et al. (1996) Depression comorbid with anxiety: Results from the WHO study on Psychological disorders in primary health care. British Journal of Psychiatry168: 38–43.
29.
ShapiroDH (1994) Manual for the Shapiro Control Inventory. Cupertino, CA: Behaviordata.
30.
SilanderTMyllymakiP (2006) A simple approach for finding the globally optimal Bayesian network structure. In: Proceedings of the twenty-second conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (UAI2006), Cambridge, MA, July, pp. 445–452. Arlington, VA: AUAI Press.
31.
SunLShenoyPP (2007) Using Bayesian networks for bankruptcy prediction: Some methodological issues. European Journal of Operational Research2(180): 738–753.
32.
WardenaarKJvan VeenTGiltayEJ, et al. (2010) Development and validation of a 30-item short adaptation of the Mood and Anxiety Symptoms Questionnaire (MASQ). Psychiatric Research179, 101–106.
33.
WeathersFWLitzBTKeaneTM, et al. (2013) The PTSD checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Available at: http://www.ptsd.va.gov
34.
WeinbergerAHGbedemahMMartinezAM, et al. (2018) Trends in depression prevalence in the USA from 2005 to 2015: Widening disparities in vulnerable groups. Psychological Medicine48(8): 1308–1315.
35.
YuanCLuTCDruzdzelMJ (2004) Annealed MAP. In: Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (UAI-04), Arlington, VA, pp. 628–635.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
