Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a novel treatment option for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. To facilitate translation into clinical practice, we interviewed parents of children who have experienced experimental tDCS. A grounded theory approach using open, axial, and selective coding provided seven emergent themes for acceptability: tDCS provides hope for parents, safety tolerability and side effects of tDCS versus medication, burden of treatment, education and trust with care providers, cost and coverage, unestablished tDCS efficacy versus established medication effectiveness, perceived compliance of tDCS versus medication. Results suggest tDCS is acceptable but depends on evidence of effectiveness and regular availability.
AndréSHeinrichSKayserF, et al. (2016) At-home tDCS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex improves visual short-term memory in mild vascular dementia. Journal of the Neurological Sciences369: 185–190.
2.
AparicioLVMGuarientiFRazzaLB, et al. (2016) A systematic review on the acceptability and tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation treatment in neuropsychiatry trials. Brain Stimulation9(5): 671–681.
3.
BennettDSPowerTJRostainAL, et al. (1996) Parent acceptability and feasibility of ADHD interventions: Assessment, correlates, and predictive validity. Journal of Pediatric Psychology21(5): 643–657.
4.
BiksonMGrossmanPThomasC, et al. (2016) Safety of transcranial direct current stimulation: Evidence based update 2016. Brain Stimulation9(5): 641–661.
5.
BreitlingCZaehleTDannhauerM, et al. (2016) Improving interference control in ADHD Patients with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience10: 72.
6.
BuchananDD’AngiulliASamsonA, et al. (2019) Making transcranial direct current stimulation treatment in atypical child and adolescent neurodevelopment a reality: Translating safety tolerability and acceptability evidence from the laboratory into the doctors office, the classroom, and home. Brain Stimulation12(2): 474.
7.
Catalá-LópezFHuttonBNúñez-BeltránA, et al. (2017) The pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: A systematic review with network meta-analyses of randomised trials. PLoS One12(7): e0180355.
8.
CharvetLShawMDobbsB, et al. (2018) Remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation increases the benefit of at-home cognitive training in multiple sclerosis. Neuromodulation21(4): 383–389.
9.
CosmoCBaptistaAFDe AraújoAN, et al. (2015) A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial of transcranial direct current stimulation in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. PLoS One10(8): e0135371.
10.
DemidovichMKolkoDJBuksteinOG, et al. (2011) Medication refusal in children with oppositional defiant disorder or conduct disorder and comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Medication history and clinical correlates. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology21(1): 57–66.
11.
DosReisSParkANgX, et al. (2017) Caregiver treatment preferences for children with a new versus existing attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnosis. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology27(3): 234–242.
12.
GiordanoJBiksonMKappenmanES, et al. (2017) Mechanisms and effects of transcranial direct current stimulation. Dose-response : A publication of International Hormesis Society15(1): 1559325816685467.
13.
GlaserBStraussA (1967) Grounded theory: The discovery of grounded theory. Sociology: The Journal of the British Sociological Association12: 27–49.
14.
JohnstonCHommersenPSeippC (2008) Acceptability of behavioral and pharmacological treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Relations to child and parent characteristics. Behavior Therapy39(1): 22–32.
15.
JohnstonCMahJWTRegambalM (2010) Parenting cognitions and treatment beliefs as predictors of experience using behavioral parenting strategies in families of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Behavior Therapy41(4): 491–504.
16.
KnotkovaHClaytonAStevensM, et al. (2019) Home-based patient-delivered remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation. In: Practical Guide to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 379–405.
17.
KrainALKendallPCPowerTJ (2005) The role of treatment acceptability in the initiation of treatment for ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders9(2): 425–434.
18.
LecompteMDGoetzJP (1982) Ethnographic data collection in evaluation research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis4(3): 387–400.
19.
LeeJCKenney-JungDLBlackerCJ, et al. (2019) Transcranial direct current stimulation in child and adolescent psychiatric disorders. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America61(3): 298–304.
20.
LefaucheurJ-PAntalAAyacheSS, et al. (2017) Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clinical Neurophysiology128(1): 56–92.
21.
NafeesBSetyawanJLloydA, et al. (2014) Parent preferences regarding stimulant therapies for ADHD: A comparison across six European countries. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry23(12): 1189–1200.
22.
RiggsAPatelVPaneriB, et al. (2018) At-Home Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) with telehealth support for symptom control in chronically-ill patients with multiple symptoms. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience12: 93.
23.
Rivera-UrbinaGNNitscheMAVicarioCM, et al. (2017) Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation in children and pediatrics. Reviews in the Neurosciences28(2): 173–184.
24.
SamaniMMAgboadaDJamilA, et al. (2019) Titrating the neuroplastic effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex. Cortex119: 350–361.
25.
SamsonATomiakEDimilloJ, et al. (2009) The lived experience of hope among parents of a child with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Perceiving the human being beyond the illness. Chronic Illness5(2): 103–114.
26.
SchatzNKFabianoGACunninghamCE, et al. (2015) Systematic review of patients’ and parents’ preferences for ADHD treatment options and processes of care. The patient8(6): 483–497.
27.
SekhonMCartwrightMFrancisJJ (2017) Acceptability of healthcare interventions: An overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Services Research17(1): 88.
28.
SikiricaVFloodEDietrichCN, et al. (2015) Unmet needs associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in eight european countries as reported by caregivers and adolescents: Results from qualitative research. Patient8(3): 269–281.
29.
SoffCSotnikovaAChristiansenH, et al. (2017) Transcranial direct current stimulation improves clinical symptoms in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Neural Transmission124(1): 133–144.
30.
SotnikovaASoffCBeckerK, et al. (2014) Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Clinical Neurophysiology125: S225–S226.
31.
SteeleRGElkinTDRobertsMC (eds) (2008) Handbook of Evidence-Based Therapies for Children and Adolescents. Issues in Clinical Child Psychology. The British Journal of Psychiatry. Springer.
32.
StuhecMMundaBSvabV, et al. (2015) Comparative efficacy and acceptability of atomoxetine, lisdexamfetamine, bupropion and methylphenidate in treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis with focus on bupropion. Journal of Affective Disorders178: 149–159.
33.
TaylorB (2013) Interviewing and analysis. In TaylorBFrancisK (eds) Qualitative Research in the Health Sciences: Methodologies, Methods and Processes. New York: Routledge, pp. 205–223.
34.
Thé RiaultAGazzolaN (2005) Feelings of inadequacy, insecurity, and incompetence among experienced therapists. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research5(1): 11–18.
35.
VicarioCMNitscheMA (2019) tDCS in pediatric neuropsychiatric disorders. In Neurotechnology and Brain Stimulation in Pediatric Psychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Disorders. US: Academic Press, pp. 217–235.
36.
WaschbuschDACunninghamCEPelhamWE, et al. (2011) A discrete choice conjoint experiment to evaluate parent preferences for treatment of young, medication naïve children with ADHD. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology40(4): 546–561.
37.
YanLWangSYuanY, et al. (2019) Effects of neurofeedback versus methylphenidate for the treatment of ADHD: Systematic review and meta-analysis of head-to-head trials. Evidence-Based Mental Health22(3): 111–117.
