The purpose of this study was to evaluate men’s perceptions of self-dynamics and partner dynamics during common everyday sickness. Five focus group interviews (N = 44) were conducted, each lasting approximately 120 minutes. The data were analyzed using a generic qualitative approach which identified two larger themes and several sub-themes: sickness appraisals and appraisal communication (gender differences in symptom appraisal and minimization of own and partner’s sickness) and coping and support strategies (individual coping, one-way provision of support, and coping together). It seems acute sickness creates shared stressors for both partners but differentially impacts each based on gender and family roles.
AcitelliLKAntonucciTC (1994) Gender differences in the link between marital support and satisfaction in older couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology67: 688–698.
2.
ArmatMRAssarroudiARadM, et al. (2018) Inductive and deductive: Ambiguous labels in qualitative content analysis. The Qualitative Report23(1): 219–221. Available at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol23/iss1/16
3.
AzungahT (2018) Qualitative research: Deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis. Qualitative Research Journal18(4): 383–400.
4.
BergCAUpchurchR (2007) A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychological Bulletin133(6): 920–954.
5.
BodenmannG (1995) A systemic-transactional conceptualization of stress and coping in couples. Swiss Journal of Psychology54: 34–49.
6.
BodenmannG (2005) Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In: RevensonTKayserKBodenmannG (eds) Couples Coping with Stress: Emerging Perspectives on Dyadic Coping. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 33–50.
7.
BodenmannGRandallAKFalconierMK (2016) Coping in couples: The systemic transactional model. In: FalconierMKRandallAKBodenmannG (eds) Couples Coping with Stress: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. New York: Routledge, pp. 5–22.
8.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2016) Common colds: Protect yourself and others. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov (accessed 2 February 2014).
CorbinJStraussA (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
12.
CoyneJCFiskeV (1992) Couples coping with chronic and catastrophic illness. In: AkamatsuTJStevensMAPHobfollSE, et al. (eds) Family Health Psychology. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, pp. 129–149.
13.
CrossSEMadsonL (1997) Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin122: 5–37.
14.
FranksMMWendorfCAGonzalezR, et al. (2004) Aid and influence: Health promoting exchanges of older married partners. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships21: 431–445.
15.
GastJPeakT (2011) “It used to be that if it weren’t broken and bleeding profusely, I would never go to the doctor”: Men, masculinity, and health. American Journal of Men’s Health5(4): 318–331.
16.
GoldsmithDJ (2009) Uncertainty and communication in couples coping with serious illness. In: AfifiTDAfifiWA (eds) Uncertainty and Information Regulation in Interpersonal Contexts: Theories and Applications. New York: Routledge, pp. 204–225.
17.
HagedoornMBuunkBKuijerRG, et al. (2000) Couples dealing with cancer: Role and gender differences regarding psychological distress and quality of life. Psycho-Oncology9: 232–242.
18.
HeijmansMde RidderDBensingJ (1999) Dissimilarity in patients’ and spouses’ representations of chronic illness: Exploration of relations to patient adaptation. Psychology and Health14: 451–466.
19.
HelgesonVSLeporeSJ (1997) Men’s adjustment to prostate cancer: The role of agency and unmitigated agency. Sex Roles37: 251–266.
20.
HelgesonVSJakubiakBVan VleetM, et al. (2018) Communal coping and adjustment to chronic illness: Theory update and evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review22: 170–195.
21.
JohnsonMDAndersonJRWalkerA, et al. (2013) Common dyadic coping is indirectly related to dietary and exercise adherence via patient and partner diabetes efficacy. Journal of Family Psychology27(5): 722–730.
22.
KahlkeRM (2014) Generic qualitative approaches: Pitfalls and benefits of methodological mixology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods13(1): 37–52.
23.
KuijerRGYbemaJFBuunkBP, et al. (2000) Active engagement, protective buffering, and overprotection: Three ways of giving support by intimate partners of patients with cancer. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology19: 256–275.
24.
LazarusRSFolkmanS (1984) Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer.
25.
LyonsRFSullivanMJLRitvoPG (with CoyneJC) (1995) Relationships in Chronic Illness and Disability. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
NorthouseLLMoodDWMontieJE, et al. (2007) Living with prostate cancer: Patients’ and spouses’ psychosocial status and quality of life. Journal of Clinical Oncology25(27): 4171–4177.
28.
NovakJRPeakTGastJ, et al. (2019) Associations between masculine norms and healthcare utilization in highly religious, heterosexual men. American Journal of Men’s Health13(3): 1557988319856739.
29.
O’BrienTBDeLongisA (1997) Coping with chronic stress: An interpersonal perspective. In: GottliebBH (ed.) Coping with Chronic Stress. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 161–190.
30.
OliverKCronanTA (2005) Correlates of physical activity among women with fibromyalgia syndrome. Annals of Behavioral Medicine29(1): 44–53.
31.
PercyWHKostereKKostereS (2015) Generic qualitative research in psychology. The Qualitative Report20(2): 76–85.
RadcliffeELowtonKMorganM (2013) Co-construction of chronic illness narratives by older stroke survivors and their spouses. Sociology of Health & Illness35(7): 993–1007.
34.
RentscherKE (2019) Communal coping in couples with health problems. Frontiers in Psychology10: 1–12.
35.
RevensonTA (2003) Scenes from a marriage: Examining support, coping, and gender within the context of chronic illness. In: SulsJWallstonKA (eds) Social Psychological Foundations of Health and Illness. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 530–559.
36.
RevensonTAAbraído-LanzaAFMajerovitzSD, et al. (2005) Couples coping with chronic illness: What’s gender got to do with it? In: RevensonTAKayserKBodenmannG (eds) Decade of Behavior. Couples Coping with Stress: Emerging Perspectives on Dyadic Coping. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 137–156.
37.
SaldanaJOmastaM (2018) Qualitative Research: Analyzing Life. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
38.
TamresLKJanickiDHelgesonVS (2002) Sex differences in coping behavior: A meta-analytic review and an examination of relative coping. Personality and Social Psychology Review6: 2–30.
39.
TolleyEEUlinPRMackN, et al. (2016) Qualitative Methods in Public Health: A Field Guide for Researchers (2nd edn). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
40.
Van WijkCMGHuismanHKolkAM (1999) Gender differences in physical symptoms and illness behavior: A health diary study. Social Science & Medicine49(8): 1061–1074.
41.
VerbruggeLM (1980) Sex differences in complaints and diagnoses. Journal of Behavioral Medicine3(4): 327–355.
42.
VerbruggeLM (1989) The twain meet: Empirical explanations of sex differences in health and mortality. Journal of Health and Social Behavior30: 282–304.
