This study explored adjustment in people with spinal cord injury; data from four focus groups are presented. Thematic analysis revealed four themes, managing goals and expectations, comparison with others, feeling useful and acceptance, showing participants positively engaged in life, positively interpreted social comparison information and set realistic goals and expectations. These positive strategies show support for adjustment theories, such as the Cognitive Adaptation Theory, the Control Process Theory and Response Shift Theory. These results also provide insight into the adjustment process of a person with spinal cord injury and may be useful in tailoring support during rehabilitation.
Barclay-GoddardRKingJDuboulozC. (2012) Building on transformative learning and Response Shift Theory to investigate quality of life changes over time in individuals with chronic conditions and disability. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation93: 214–220.
2.
BogartLMHelgesonVS (2000) Social comparison among women with breast cancer: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology30: 547–575.
3.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
4.
BrickmanPBulmanRJ (1977) Pleasure and pain in social comparison. In: SulsJWillsTA (eds) Social Comparison Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, pp. 149–186.
5.
BuckelewSPBaumstarkKEFrankRG. (1990) Adjustment following spinal cord injury. Rehabilitation Psychology35(2): 100–109.
6.
BuunkBPZurriagaRGonzalezP (2006a) Social comparison, coping and depression in people with spinal cord injury. Psychology & Health21(6): 791–807.
7.
BuunkBPZurriagaRGonzalezP. (2006b) Targets and dimensions of social comparison among people with spinal cord injury and other health problems. British Journal of Health Psychology11: 677–693.
8.
ByrnesMBeibyJRayP. (2012) Patient-focused goal planning process and outcome after spinal cord injury rehabilitation: Quantitative and qualitative audit. Clinical Rehabilitation26(12): 1141–1149.
9.
CarverCSScheierMF (1990) Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review97(1): 19–35.
10.
ChevalierZKennedyPSherlockO (2009) Spinal cord injury, coping and psychological adjustment: a literature review. Spinal Cord47: 778-782.
11.
DibbBYardleyL (2006) How does social comparison within a self-help group influence adjustment to chronic illness? A longitudinal study. Social Science & Medicine63(6): 1602–1613.
12.
DicksonAO’BrienGWardR. (2012) Adjustment and coping in spousal caregivers following a traumatic spinal cord injury: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Health Psychology17: 247–257.
13.
Donovan-HallMKBurridgeJDibbB. (2011) The views of people with spinal cord injury about the use of functional electrical stimulation. Artificial Organs35(3): 204–211.
14.
DorstynDMathiasJLinelyD (2011) Efficacy of cognitive behaviour therapy for the management of psychological outcomes following spinal cord injury: A meta-analysis. Journal of Health Psychology16: 374–391.
15.
GalvinLRGodfreyHPD (2001) The impact of coping on emotional adjustment to spinal cord injury (SCI): Review of the literature and application of a stress appraisal and coping formulation. Spinal Cord39: 615–627.
16.
HammellKW (2007) Quality of life after spinal cord injury: A meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Spinal Cord45: 124–139.
17.
JoffeHYardleyL (2004) Content and thematic analysis. In: MarksDFYardleyL (eds) Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology. London: SAGE, pp. 56–68.
18.
KennedyPDuffJEvanM. (2003) Coping effectiveness training reduces depression and anxiety following traumatic spinal cord injuries. British Journal of Clinical Psychology42: 41–52.
19.
KruegerRACaseyMA (2009) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. London: SAGE.
20.
LustigDC (2005) The adjustment process for individuals with spinal cord injury: The effect of perceived premorbid sense of coherence. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin48: 146–156.
21.
MartzELivnehHPriebeM. (2005) Predictors of psychosocial adaptation among people with spinal cord injury or disorder. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation86: 1182–1192.
22.
MonaLRKrauseJSNorrisFH. (2000) Sexual expression following spinal cord injury. NeuroRehabilitation15: 121–131.
23.
MurrayMChamberlainK (1999) Qualitative Health Psychology. London: SAGE.
24.
PakenhamKI (2007) Making sense of multiple sclerosis. Rehabilitation Psychology52(4): 380–389.
25.
PostMWMVan LeeuwenCMC (2012) Psychosocial issues in spinal cord injury: A review. Spinal Cord50(5): 382–389.
26.
SchulzRDeckerS (1985) Long-term adjustment to physical disability: The role of social support, perceived control, and self-blame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology48(5): 1162–1172.
27.
SprangersMAGSchwartzCE (1999) Integrating response shift in health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Social Science & Medicine48: 1507–1515.
28.
TaylorSE (1983) Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation. American Psychologist38: 1161–1173.
29.
TaylorSELitchmanRRWoodJV (1984) Attributions, beliefs about control, and adjustment to breast cancer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology46(3): 489–502.
30.
TennenHMcKeeTEAffleckG (2000) Social comparison processes in health and illness. In: SulsJWheelerL (eds) Handbook of Social Comparison: Theory and Research. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 443–483.
31.
ThompsonNJCokerJKrauseJS. (2003) Purpose in life as a mediator of adjustment in spinal cord injury. Rehabilitation Psychology48: 100–108.
32.
Van LeeuwenCMCKraaijeveldSLindemanE. (2012) Association between psychological factors and quality of life ratings in persons with spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Spinal Cord50(3): 174–187.
33.
WeitznerESurcaSWieseS. (2011) Getting on with life: Positive experiences of living with spinal cord injury. Qualitative Health Research21(110): 1455–1468.
34.
WillsTA (1997) Modes and families of coping: An analysis of downward comparison in the structure of other cognitive and behavioural mechanisms. In: BuunkBGibbonsFX (eds) Health, Coping and Well-Being: Perspectives from Social Comparison Theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 167–193.
