Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-9
‘I am free in my wheelchair but pain does have a say in it though’: The meaning and experience of quality of life when living with paraplegia and chronic pain
This study investigated how wheelchair-using individuals with paraplegia and chronic pain make sense of the factors associated with quality of life based on interviews using photo-elicitation and interpretative phenomenological analysis. Three superordinate themes emerged in the analysis: experiencing quality of life through the perception of self and identity, interpersonal relationships as facilitators and barriers to quality of life and life in a wheelchair: pain experience and management. Quality of life for those living with paraplegia and chronic pain is experienced as a complex interaction across several life domains. The use of photographs may improve the communication of pain-related experiences and understanding by healthcare staff.
BoswellBB (1997) Exploring quality of life of adults with spinal cord injuries. Perceptual and Motor Skills84(Suppl. 3): 1149–1150.
4.
BurtonAHughesMDempseyRC (2017) Quality of life research: A case for combining photo-elicitation with interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology14(4): 375–393.
5.
BuryM (1982) Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health & Illness4(2): 167–182.
6.
CarrAJHigginsonIJ (2001) Are quality of life measures patient centred?BMJ322: 1357–1360.
7.
CelikECErhanBLakseE (2012) The clinical characteristics of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord50(8): 585–589.
8.
CollierJ (1957) Photography in anthropology: A report on two experiments. American Anthropologist59: 843–859.
9.
CoxAFaithfullS (2015) Aiding a reassertion of self: A qualitative study of the views and experiences of women with ovarian cancer receiving long-term nurse-led telephone follow-up. Supportive Care in Cancer23(8): 2357–2364.
10.
DicksonAAllanDO’CarrollR (2008) Biographical disruption and the experience of loss following a spinal cord injury: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Psychology & Health23(4): 407–425.
11.
DugganCHDijkersM (2001) Quality of life after spinal cord injury: A qualitative study. Rehabilitation Psychology46(1): 3–27.
12.
GalliGLenngenhagerBScivolettoG, et al (2015) Don’t look at my wheelchair! The plasticity of longlasting prejudice. Medical Education49: 1239–1247.
13.
GirondaRJClarkMENeugaardB, et al (2004) Upper limb pain in a national sample of veterans with paraplegia. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine27(2): 120–127.
14.
GoughB (2003) Deconstructing reflexivity. In: FinlayLGoughB (eds) Reflexivity: A Practical Guide for Researchers in Health and Social Sciences. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 21–35.
15.
GutierrezDDThompsonLKempB, et al (2007) The relationship of shoulder pain intensity to quality of life, physical activity, and community participation in persons with paraplegia. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine30(3): 251–255.
16.
HammellK (2007) Quality of life after spinal cord injury: A meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Spinal Cord45(2): 124–139.
17.
HarperD (2002) Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies17(1): 13–26.
18.
HellstromC (2001) Temporal dimensions of the self concept: Entrapped and possible selves in chronic pain. Psychology & Health16: 111–124.
19.
HenwoodPEllisJA (2004) Chronic neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury: The patient’s perspective. Pain Research & Management9(1): 39–45.
20.
KirkhamJASmithJAHavsteen-FranklinD (2015) Painting pain: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of representations of living with chronic pain. Health Psychology34(4): 398–406.
21.
KvaleSBrinkmannS (2009) Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. London: SAGE.
22.
MannPJChadKE (2001) Components of quality of life for persons with a quadriplegic and paraplegic spinal cord injury. Qualitative Health Research11(6): 795–811.
23.
MattarAAGHitzigSLMcGillivrayCF (2015) A qualitative study on the use of personal information technology by persons with spinal cord injury. Disability and Rehabilitation37(15): 1362–1371.
24.
ModirianEPirouziPSoroushM, et al (2010) Chronic pain after spinal cord injury: Results of a long-term study. Pain Medicine11(7): 1037–1043.
25.
MüllerRPeterCCiezaA, et al (2012) The role of social support and social skills in people with spinal cord injury–A systematic review of the literature. Spinal Cord50: 94–106.
26.
National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Centre (2015) Facts and figures at a glance. Available at: https://www.nscisc.uab.edu/
OsbornMSmithJA (1998) The personal experience of chronic benign lower back pain: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. British Journal of Health Psychology3(1): 65–83.
29.
OsbornMSmithJA (2006) Living with a body separate from the self. The experience of the body in chronic benign low back pain: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences20(2): 216–223.
30.
PadfieldDZakrzewskaJMWilliamsAC (2015) Do photographic images of pain improve communication during pain consultations?Pain Research & Management20(3): 123–128.
31.
RadleyATaylorD (2003) Images of recovery: A photo-elicitation study on a hospital ward. Qualitative Health Research13(1): 77–99.
32.
RavenscroftAAhmedYSBurnsideIG (2000) Chronic pain after SCI. A patient survey. Spinal Cord38(10): 611–614.
33.
RodhamKBoxellEMcCabeC, et al (2012) Transitioning from a hospital rehabilitation programme to home: Exploring the expereinces of people with complex regional pain syndrome. Psychology & Health27(10): 1150–1165.
34.
SmithJAOsbornM (2007) Pain as an assault on the self: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the psychological impact of chronic benign low back pain. Psychology & Health22(5): 517–534.
35.
SmithJAOsbornM (2015) Interpretative phenomenological analysis as a useful methodology for research on the lived experience of pain. British Journal of Pain9(1): 41–42.
SummersJDRapoffMAVargheseG, et al (1991) Psychosocial factors in chronic spinal cord injury pain. Pain47(2): 183–189.
38.
Van LeeuwenCMCPostMWMvan AsbeckFW, et al (2010) Social support and life satisfaction in spinal cord injury during and up to one year after inpatient rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine42(3): 265–271.
39.
WhitehurstDGSuryaprakashNEngelL, et al (2014) Perceptions of individuals living with spinal cord injury toward preference-based quality of life instruments: A qualitative exploration. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes12(1): 50.
40.
WHOQOL Group (1998) The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Social Science & Medicine46(12): 1569–1585.
41.
WilsonJRHashimotoREDettoriJR, et al (2011) Spinal cord injury and quality of life: A systematic review of outcome measures. Evidence-based Spine-Care Journal2(1): 37–44.
42.
YardleyL (2000) Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology & Health15(2): 215–228.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
