In this article, we present an idiographic analysis of a couple’s experience of living and coming to terms with age-related macular degeneration. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to explore three joint interviews, conducted over an 18-month period, with a married couple (aged 82 and 77 years) both living with age-related macular degeneration. Three themes are discussed: the disruption of vision impairment, managing mutual deterioration and resilience through togetherness. We discuss the existential challenges of vision impairment and consider the applicability of Galvin and Todres’ typology of well-being as a means of understanding well-being in older adults.
AllanG (1980) A note on interviewing spouses together. Journal of Marriage and the Family42(1): 205–210.
2.
ArskeyH (1996) Collecting data through joint interviews. Social Research Update15: 1–8.
3.
BennionAEShawRLGibsonJM (2012) What do we know about the experience of age related macular degeneration? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research. Social Science and Medicine75: 976–985.
4.
BenyaminiYGozlanMKokiaE (2009) Women’s and men’s perceptions of infertility and their associations with psychological adjustment: A dyadic approach. British Journal of Health Psychology14(1): 1–16.
5.
BookwalaJ (2011) Marital quality as a moderator of the effects of poor vision on quality of life among older adults. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences66(5): 605–616.
6.
BookwalaJFeketeE (2009) The role of psychological resources in the affective well-being of never-married adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships26(4): 411–428.
7.
BrodyBLGamstACWilliamsRA. (2001) Depression, visual acuity, comorbidity, and disability associated with age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology108(10): 1893–1900.
8.
BunceCWormaldR (2006) Leading causes of certification for blindness and partial sight in England and Wales. BMC Public Health6: 58.
9.
BurtonAE (2013) The experience of living with age related macular degeneration: a longitudinal study into the impact of age related macular degeneration on quality of life (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
10.
BurtonAEShawRLGibsonJM (2013) ‘I’d like to know what causes it, you know, anything I’ve done?’ Are we meeting the information and support needs of patients with macular degeneration? A qualitative study. BMJ Open, 3:e003306, DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003306.
11.
CahillMTStinnettSSBanksAD. (2005) Quality of life after macular translocation with 360 degrees peripheral retinectomy for age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology112(1): 144–151.
12.
CharmazK (1991) Good Days and Bad Days: The Self in Chronic Illness and Time. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
13.
CornwellEYWaiteLJ (2009) Social disconnectedness, perceived isolation, and health among older adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior50(1): 31–48.
14.
EllsC (2001) Lessons about autonomy from the experience of disability. Social Theory and Practice27(4): 599–615.
15.
FineMGlendenningC (2005) Dependence, independence or inter-dependence? Revisiting the concepts of ‘care’ and ‘dependency’. Ageing and Society25(4): 601–621.
16.
FlyvbergB (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry12(2): 219–245.
17.
FriedmanDSO’ColmainBJMunozB. (2004) Prevalence of age related macular degeneration in the United States. Archives of Ophthalmology122(4): 564–572.
18.
GalvinKTTodresL (2011) Kinds of well-being: A conceptual framework that provides direction for caring. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being. Epub ahead of print 9December. DOI: 10.3402/qhw.v6i4.10362.
19.
HarreR (1984) Personal Being: A Theory for Individual Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
HeideggerM (1962/1927) Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell.
21.
KorenC (2011) Continuity and discontinuity: The case of second couplehood in old age. The Gerontologist51(5): 687–698.
22.
LincolnYSGubaEG (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
23.
MitchellJWolffsohnJWoodcockA. (2008) The MacDQoL individualized measure of the impact of macular degeneration on quality of life: Reliability and responsiveness. American Journal of Ophthalmology146(3): 447–454.
24.
ParsonsT (1951) The Social System. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press of Glencoe.
25.
Royal College of Ophthalmologists (2009) Age Related Macular Degeneration: Guidelines for Management. London: Royal College of Ophthalmologists.
26.
ShepperdDCoyleAHegartyP (2010) Discourses of friendship between heterosexual women and gay men: Mythical norms and an absence of desire. Feminism & Psychology20(2): 205–224.
SpinelliE (1989) The Interpreted World: Introduction to Phenomenological Psychology. London: SAGE.
29.
SteinJDBrownMMBrownGC. (2003) Quality patients, of life with macular degeneration: Perceptions of clinicians, and community members. The British Journal of Ophthalmology87(1): 8–12.
30.
StrawbridgeWJWallhagenMIShemaSJ (2007) Impact of spouse vision impairment on partner health and well-being: A longitudinal analysis of couples. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences62(5): S315–S322.
31.
TodresLGalvinKT (2010) ‘Dwelling-mobility’: An existential theory of well-being. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being5(3). DOI: 10.3402/qhw.v5i3.5444.
32.
ToombsK (1993) The Meaning of Illness: A Phenomenological Account of the Different Perpsectives of Physician and Patient. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
33.
YardleyL (2000) Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology & Health15(2): 215–228.
