This study examined the constructs of capability, opportunity and motivation from the COM-B model and their influence on moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Using a prospective survey design, 186 healthy adults completed measures representing the theoretical domains framework mapped to the COM-B, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity 1 week later. The main indicators for the COM constructs were ‘habits’ (Capability), ‘subjective norms’ (Opportunity) and ‘exercise self-identity’ (Motivation). Motivation (77%) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (50%) were strongly predicted, with Capability and Motivation as key drivers of behaviour. Motivation was a strong mediator for Capability on behaviour. Future research should consider this approach for other populations and behaviours.
AjzenI (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50(2): 179–211.
2.
AndersonDFCychoszCM (1994) Development of an exercise identity scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills78(3): 747–751.
3.
BollenKLennoxR (1991) Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin110(2): 305–314.
4.
BollenKADiamantopoulosA (2017) In defense of causal–formative indicators: Minority report. Psychological Methods22(3): 581–596.
5.
BridleCRiemsmaRPPattendenJ, et al. (2005) Systematic review of the effectiveness of health behavior interventions based on the transtheoretical model. Psychology & Health20(3): 283–301.
6.
CaneJO’ConnorDMichieS (2012) Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implementation Science7(1): 37.
7.
CaneJRichardsonMJohnstonM, et al. (2015) From lists of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) to structured hierarchies: Comparison of two methods of developing a hierarchy of BCTs. British Journal of Health Psychology20(1): 130–150.
8.
CraigCLMarshallALSjostromM, et al. (2003) International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise35(8): 1381–1395.
9.
de BruijnGVerkooijenKde VriesNK, et al. (2012) Antecedents of self identity and consequences for action control: An application of the theory of planned behaviour in the exercise domain. Psychology of Sport and Exercise13: 771–778.
10.
DeciELRyanRM (1987) The support of autonomy and the control of behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology53(6): 1024–1037.
11.
DiamantopoulosAWinklhoferHM (2001) Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research38(2): 269–277.
12.
EcheverriaMSEDiez-RouxAVLinkBG (2004) Reliability of self-reported neighborhood characteristics. Journal of Urban Health81(4): 682–701.
13.
FrancisJJEcclesMPJohnstonM, et al. (2004) Constructing Questionnaires based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A Manual for Health Services Researchers. Newcastle upon Tyne: Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
14.
GardnerBLallyP (2013) Does intrinsic motivation strengthen physical activity habit? Modeling relationships between self-determination, past behaviour, and habit strength. Journal of Behavioural Medicine36(5): 488–197.
HaggerMSChatzisarantisNLBiddleSJ (2002) A meta-analytic review of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior in physical activity: Predictive validity and the contribution of additional variables. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology24: 3–32.
17.
HairJFJrHultGTomasM, et al. (2014) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
18.
HalonenJIStenholmSKivimäkiM, et al. (2015) Is change in availability of sports facilities associated with change in physical activity? A prospective cohort study. Preventive Medicine73: 10–14.
19.
HenselerJHubonaGRayPA (2016) Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management and Data Systems116(1): 2–20.
20.
HoffmannTCGlasziouPPBoutronI, et al. (2014) Better reporting of interventions: Template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. British Medical Journal348: g1687.
21.
HowlettNTrivediDTroopNA, et al. (2015) What are the most effective behaviour change techniques to promote physical activity and/or reduce sedentary behaviour in inactive adults? A systematic review protocol. BMJ Open5: e008573.
22.
HuLBentlerPM (1998) Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods3(4): 424–453.
23.
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (2005) Guidelines for data processing and analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Available at: https://sites.google.com/site/theipaq/scoring-protocol (accessed 16 August 2014).
24.
KlineRB (2016) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling (4th edn). New York: Guilford.
25.
LeePHMacfarlaneDJLamT, et al. (2011) Validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF): A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity8(1): 115.
26.
LiKIannottiRJHaynieDL, et al. (2014) Motivation and planning as mediators of the relation between social support and physical activity among U.S. adolescents: A nationally representative study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity11(1): 42.
27.
McEachanRRCConnerMTaylorNJ, et al. (2011) Prospective prediction of health-related behaviours with the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review5(2): 97–144.
28.
MichieSAtkinsLWestR (2014) The Behaviour Change Wheel: A Guide to Designing Interventions. Sutton: Silverback Publishing.
29.
MichieSFixsenDGrimshawJM, et al. (2009) Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: The need for a scientific method. Implementation Science4: 40.
30.
MichieSJohnstonMAbrahamC, et al. (2005) Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: A consensus approach. Quality and Safety in Health Care14(1): 26–33.
31.
MichieSRichardsonMJohnstonM, et al. (2013) The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine46(1): 81–95.
32.
MichieSvan StralenMMWestR (2011) The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science6(1): 42.
33.
OgdenJ (2016) Celebrating variability and a call to limit systematisation: The example of the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy and the Behaviour Change Wheel. Health Psychology Review10(3): 245–250.
34.
PerronBEGillespieDF (2015) Key Concepts in Measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
PrestwichASniehottaFFWhittingtonC, et al. (2014) Does theory influence the effectiveness of health behavior interventions? Meta-analysis. Health Psychology33(5): 465–474.
36.
ProchaskaJODiClementeCC (1982) Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice19(3): 276–288.
37.
RhodesREBruijnGJ (2013) How big is the physical activity intention–behaviour gap? A meta-analysis using the action control framework. British Journal of Health Psychology18(2): 296–309.
38.
RhodesREDickauL (2012) Experimental evidence of the intention-behaviour relationship in the physical activity domain: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology31(6): 724–727.
39.
RhodesREYaoCA (2015) Models accounting for intention-behavior discordance in the physical activity domain: A user’s guide, content overview, and review of current evidence. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity12(1): 9.
40.
RhodesREJanssenIBredinSS, et al. (2017) Physical activity: Health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions. Psychology & Health32(8): 942–975.
41.
RingleCMWendeSBeckerJM (2015) Smartpls 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. Available at: http://www.smartpls.com
42.
RzewnickiRAuweeleYVBourdeaudhuijID (2003) Addressing overreporting on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) telephone survey with a population sample. Public Health Nutrition6(3): 299–305.
43.
SallisJFGrossmanRMPinskiRB, et al. (1987) The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Preventive Medicine16(6): 825–836.
SniehottaFFScholzUSchwarzerR, et al. (2005a) Long-term effects of two psychological interventions on physical exercise and self-regulation following coronary rehabilitation. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine12(4): 244–255.
46.
SniehottaFFSchwarzerRScholzU, et al. (2005b) Action planning and coping planning for long-term lifestyle change: Theory and assessment. European Journal of Social Psychology35(4): 565–576.
TaylorNLawtonRConnerM (2013) Development and initial validation of the determinants of physical activity questionnaire. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity10(1): 74.
49.
ThompsonER (2007) Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology38(2): 227–242.
50.
VerplankenBOrbellS (2003) Reflections on past behavior: A self-report index of habit strength. Journal of Applied Social Psychology33(6): 1313–1330.
51.
VlachopoulosSPKaperoniMMoustakaFC (2011) The relationship of self-determination theory variables to exercise identity. Psychology of Sport and Exercise12: 265–272.
52.
WareJEJrSherbourneCD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care30: 473–483.
53.
WebbTLSheeranP (2006) Does changing behavioral intentions engender behaviour change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin132(2): 249–268.
54.
WilliamsSFrenchD (2011) What are the most effective intervention techniques for changing physical activity self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour – And are they the same?Health Education Research26(2): 308–322.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
