The study examined whether the items of the World Health Organization Quality of Life—Brief questionnaire can assess its four underlying domains (Physical, Psychological, Social, and Environment) in a sample of lung cancer patients. All patients (n = 1150) were recruited from a medical center in Tainan, and each participant completed the World Health Organization Quality of Life—Brief. Several Rasch rating scale models were used to examine the data-model fit, and Rasch analyses corroborated that each domain of the World Health Organization Quality of Life—Brief could be unidimensional. Although three items were found to have a poor fit, all the other items fit the unidimensionality with ordered thresholds.
AdlerNENewmanK (2002) Socioeconomic disparities in health: Pathways and policies. Health Affairs21: 60–76.
2.
BaloghEPatlakMNassSJ (2013) Delivering Affordable Cancer Care in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
3.
BloomJRPetersonsDMKangSH (2007) Multi-dimensional quality of life among long-term (5+ years) adult cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology16: 691–706.
4.
BravemanPACubbinCEgerterS. (2010) Socioeconomic disparities in health in the United States: What the patterns tell us. American Journal of Public Health100: S186–S196.
5.
CagleyMLeeM (2009) Social support, networks, and happiness. Today’s Research on Aging17: 1–6.
6.
CellaDFBonomiAELloydSR. (1995) Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) quality of life instrument. Lung Cancer12(3): 199–220.
7.
ChangC-CSuJ-ATsaiC-S. (2015) Rasch analysis suggested three unidimensional domains for Affiliate Stigma Scale: Additional psychometric evaluation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology68(6): 674–683.
8.
ChangK-CLinC-Y (in press) Effects of publicly-funded and quality of life on attendance rate among methadone maintenance treatment patients in Taiwan: An 18-month follow-up study. Harm Reduction Journal.
9.
ChangK-CWangJ-DTangH-P., (2014) Psychometric evaluation, using Rasch analysis, of the WHOQOL-BREF in heroin-dependent people undergoing methadone maintenance treatment: Further item validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes12: 148.
10.
ChienC-WBondTG (2009) Measurement properties of fine motor scale of Peabody developmental motor scales-second edition: A Rasch analysis. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation88(5): 376–386.
11.
ChienT-WWangW-CChienC-C. (2011) Rasch analysis of positive changes following adversity in cancer patients attending community support groups. Psycho-Oncology20: 98–105.
12.
ClaassensLvan MeerbeeckJCoensC. (2011) Health-related quality of life in non-small-cell lung cancer: An update of a systemic review on methodological issues in randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology29: 2104–2120.
13.
Den OudstenBLVan HeckGLVan der SteegAF. (2009) The WHOQOL-100 has good psychometric properties in breast cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology62(2): 195–205.
14.
FerlayJShinHRBrayF. (2010) Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. International Journal of Cancer127: 2893–2917.
15.
GroenvoldMKleeMCSprangersMA., (1997) Validation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 Quality of Life Questionnaire through combined qualitative and quantitative assessment of patient–observer agreement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology4: 441–450.
16.
HollandPWWainerH (1993) Differential Item Functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
HuangW-YLinC-Y (2015) The relationship between self-stigma and quality of life among people with mental illness who participated in a community program. Journal of Nature and Science1(7): e135.
18.
JafariPBagheriZSafeM (2012a) Item and response-category functioning of the Persian version of the KIDSCREEN-27: Rasch partial credit model. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes10: 127.
19.
JafariPBagheriZAyatollahiSMT. (2012b) Using Rasch rating scale model to reassess the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the PedsQLTM 4.0 Generic Core Scales in school children. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes10: 27.
20.
KhanAChienC-WBrauerSG (2013) Rasch-based scoring offered more precision in differentiating patient groups in measuring upper limb function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology66: 681–687.
21.
KookSHVarniJW (2008) Validation of the Korean version of the pediatric quality of life inventory™ 4.0 (PedsQL™) generic core scale in school children and adolescents using the Rasch model. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes6: 41.
22.
KrägelohCUKerstenPRex BillingtonD. (2013) Validation of the WHOQOL-BREF quality of life questionnaire for general use in New Zealand: Confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis. Quality of Life Research22(6): 1451–1457.
23.
LeongKPYakSCSaurajenAS. (2005) Why generic and disease-specific quality-of-life instruments should be used together for the evaluation of patients with persistent allergic rhinitis. Clinical and Experimental Allergy35: 288–298.
24.
LiangM-WChangC-HYehY-C. (2009) Psychometric evaluation of the WHOQOL-BREF in community-dwelling older people in Taiwan using Rasch analysis. Quality of Life Research18: 605–618.
25.
LinC-YChangK-CWangJ-D. (in press) Quality of life and its determinants of heroin addicts receiving methadone maintenance program: Comparison with matched referents from general population. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association.
26.
LinC-YLuhW-MChengC-P. (2014) Evaluating the wording effect and psychometric properties of the Kid-KINDL: Using the multitrait-multimethod approach. European Journal of Psychological Assessment30(2): 100–109.
27.
LinC-YLuhW-MYangA-L. (2012) Psychometric properties and gender invariance of the Chinese version of the self-report Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4.0: Short form is acceptable. Quality of Life Research21: 177–182.
28.
LinacreJMWrightBD (2009) A User’s Guide to WINSTEPS. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.
29.
NiezgodaHEPaterJL (1993) A validation study of the domains of the core EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire. Quality of Life Research3: 19–25.
30.
ParedesTSimõesMRCanavarroMC (2010) Psychometric properties of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-100) in Portuguese patients with sarcoma. Psychology, Health, and Medicine15(4): 420–433.
31.
PeterCCiezaAGeyhS (2014) Rasch analysis of the General Self-Efficacy Scale in spinal cord injury. Journal of Health Psychology19(4): 544–555.
32.
ReesGLamoureuxELXieJ. (2013) Using Rasch analysis to evaluate the validity of the diabetes-specific version of the Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised. Journal of Health Psychology. Epub ahead of print 1December. DOI: 10.1177/1359105313511840.
33.
RochaNSFleckMP (2009) Validity of the Brazilian version of WHOQOL-BREF in depressed patients using Rasch modelling. Revista de Saude Publica43(1): 147–153.
34.
RochaNSPowerMJBushnellDM. (2012) Cross-cultural evaluation of the WHOQOL-BREF domains in primary care depressed patients using Rasch analysis. Medical Decision Making32(1): 41–55.
35.
ShihC-LWangW-C (2009) Differential item functioning detection using the multiple indicators, multiple causes method with a pure short anchor. Applied Psychological Measurement33: 184–199.
36.
ShihC-LChenC-HSheuC-F. (2013) Validating and improving the reliability of the EORTC QLQ-C30 using a multidimensional Rasch model. Value in Health16: 848–854.
37.
SilverJKBaimaJ (2013) Cancer prehabilitation: An opportunity to decrease treatment-related morbidity, increase cancer treatment options, and improve physical and psychological health outcomes. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation92(8): 715–727.
38.
SilverJKBaimaJMayerRS (2013) Impairment-driven cancer rehabilitation: An essential component of quality care and survivorship. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians63(5): 295–317.
39.
SkevingtonSMLotfyMO’ConnellKA; WHOQOL Group (2004) The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Quality of Life Research13(2): 299–310.
40.
SuC-TNgH-SYangA-L. (2014) Psychometric evaluation of the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) for patients with schizophrenia. Psychological Assessment26(3): 980–989.
41.
The WHOQOL Group (1993) Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Quality of Life Research2: 153–159.
42.
The WHOQOL Group (1998) Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine28: 551–558.
43.
WangW-CWilsonM (2005) Exploring local item dependence using a random-effects facet model. Applied Psychological Measurement4: 296–318.
44.
WangW-CYaoGTasiY-J. (2006) Validating, improving reliability, and estimating correlation of the four subscales in the WHOQOL-BREF using multidimensional Rasch analysis. Quality of Life Research15(4): 607–620.
WrightBDLinacreJMGustafsonJ-E. (1994) Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions8: 370.
47.
YaoGChungC-WYuC-F. (2002) Development and verification of validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association101(5): 342–351.
48.
ZimmermanEWoolfSH (2014) Understanding the Relationship between Education and Health. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
