Insufficient attention has been given to the influence of context on health-related behaviour change. This article reports on walk-along interviews conducted with 10 leaders of walking groups while leading their groups to investigate the influence of contextual factors on walking behaviours in groups. Data analysis used ideas from thematic analysis and grounded theory, approaching the data inductively. We identified that characteristics of place influenced the type of walking that people do in groups and the processes used by walkers to make sense of their behaviours in the places they walk. This research provides insight into how place influences walking in groups. It also suggests recommendations for co-ordinators and policymakers that could be used to facilitate behaviour change, when designing interventions targeting public health within the community.
AvenellABroomJBrownTJ. (2004) Systematic review of the long-term effects and economic consequences of treatments for obesity and implications for health improvement. Health Technology Assessment8(21).
2.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
3.
BrownLDurrheimK (2009) Different kinds of knowing: Generating qualitative data through mobile interviewing. Qualitative Inquiry15(5): 911–930.
4.
CarpianoRM (2009) Come take a walk with me: The ‘go-along’ interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-being. Health & Place15(1): 263–272.
5.
CauwenbergJVHolleVVSimonsD. (2012) Environmental factors influencing older adults’ walking for transportation: A study using walk-along interviews. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity9: 85.
6.
ChamberlainKCamicPYardleyL (2004) Qualitative analysis of experience: Grounded theory and case studies. In: MarksDYardleyL (eds) Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology. London: SAGE, pp. 69–89.
7.
CorbinJStraussA (1990) Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology13(1): 418–427.
8.
CumminsSCurtisSDiez-RouxA. (2007) Understanding and representing ‘Place’ in health research: A relational approach. Social Science & Medicine65(9): 1825–1838.
9.
DishmanRKBuckworthJ (1996) Increasing physical activity: A quantitative synthesis. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise28(6): 706–719.
10.
DohertyARKellyPKerrJ. (2013) Using wearable cameras to categorise type and context of accelerometer-identified episodes of physical activity. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity10: 22.
11.
DuncanMJSpenceJCMummeryWK (2005) Perceived environment and physical activity: A meta-analysis of selected environmental characteristics. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity2: 11.
12.
HodgettsDRadleyAChamberlainK. (2007) Health inequalities and homelessness: Considering material, spatial and relational dimensions. Journal of Health Psychology12(5): 709–725.
13.
HodgettsDJStolteOChamberlainK. (2010) The mobile hermit and the city: Considering links between places, objects, and identities in social psychological research on homelessness. The British Journal of Social Psychology49: 285–303.
14.
HumpelNOwenNLeslieE (2002) Environmental factors associated with adults’ participation in physical activity: A review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine22(3): 188–199.
15.
KassavouA (2012) Building an evidence base for effective walking groups. PhD Thesis, Coventry University, Coventry.
16.
KassavouATurnerAFrenchDP (2013) Do interventions to promote walking in groups increase physical activity? A meta-analysis. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity10: 18.
17.
KassavouATurnerAHamborgT. (in press) Predicting maintenance of attendance at walking groups: Testing constructs from three leading maintenance theories. Health Psychology.
18.
LeeJIngoldT (2006) Fieldwork on foot: Perceiving, routing, socializing. In: ColemanSCollinsP (eds) Locating the Field: Space, Place and Context in Anthropology. Oxford: Berg, pp. 67–86.
19.
MacintyreSEllawayACumminsS (2002) Place effects on health: How can we conceptualise, operationalise and measure them?Social Science & Medicine55(1): 125–139.
20.
MorrisJNHardmanAE (1997) Walking to health. Sports Medicine23: 306–312.
21.
NHS Information Centre for Health and Social Care (2009) Health Survey for England: Physical Activity and Fitness. London: National Health Service.
22.
PinkS (2007) Walking with video. Visual Studies22(3): 240–252.
23.
PinkS (2008) An urban tour: The sensory sociality of ethnographic place-making. Ethnography9(2): 175–196.
24.
PriestJ (2007) The healing balm effect: Using a walking group to feel better. Journal of Health Psychology12(1): 36–52.
25.
RadleyAChamberlainKHodgettsD. (2010) From means to occasion: Walking in the life of homeless people. Visual Studies25(1): 36–45.
26.
SuttonS (2002) Changing health behaviour: Intervention and research with social cognition models. In: RutterDQuineL (eds) Using Social Cognition Models to Develop Health Behaviour Interventions: Problems and Assumptions. London: Open University Press, pp. 193–208.
27.
UK Department of Health (2004) At least five a week: Evidence on the impact of physical activity and its relationship to health. A report from the Chief Medical Officer. London: Department of Health.
28.
UK Department of Health (2011) Start active, stay active. A report on physical activity for health from four home countries. Chief Medical Officer. Gateway Reference 16306, 11July. London: Department of Health.
29.
US Department of Health & Human Services (2008a) Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report. Washington, DC: US Department of Health & Human Services.
30.
US Department of Health & Human Services (2008b) Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Be Active, Healthy and Happy. Washington, DC: US Department of Health & Human Services.
