Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Peer-led physical activity programs can support healthy aging, yet the leader-related factors that sustain their delivery are not well understood. This study investigates how peer-leader attributes and motivation influence leadership outcomes critical for program sustainability. A 12-week prospective survey was conducted with 131 trained walking group leaders (mean age = 62.7 years). Guided by the Self-Determination Theory, we examined how autonomous and controlled volunteer motivation and peer-leader attributes related to leadership outcomes. Participants completed measures of motivation at baseline (Time 1), perceptions of peer-leader attributes at midpoint (Time 2), and leadership outcomes at the end of the study (Time 3). Exploratory factor analysis identified three leadership attributes: supportive disposition, responsive leadership, and relational influence. Hierarchical regression analyses tested how these attributes, alongside autonomous and controlled motivation, predicted role satisfaction, perceived efficacy, and continuation intentions. Results showed that responsive leadership predicted both role satisfaction and perceived efficacy, while Relational Influence predicted satisfaction. Autonomous motivation also contributed to higher satisfaction and efficacy, with these models explaining around 23% to 26% of variance. Continuation intentions were minimally predicted by individual factors, suggesting other organizational influences. This study adds to the literature by providing a validated, brief measure of peer-leader attributes and clarifying how specific leader behaviors and motivations shape rewarding leadership experiences. For public health research and practice, findings indicate that selecting and training peer leaders should emphasize responsiveness and participant-focused behaviors, alongside supporting leaders’ psychological needs for autonomy. While these factors enhance satisfaction and efficacy, sustaining long-term participation may require broader organizational support, offering guidance for program design and policy initiatives.

Keywords

peer leadership walking groups autonomous motivation sustainability leadership efficacy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aprobato

G. S. D. O.

Lorenzi

L. J.

Sobrinho

A. C. D. S.

Ferreira

L. K.

Schwenger

L. L.

Coco

T. G. D. S.

Guerra

P. H.

Gomes

G. A. D. O.

(2024). Characteristics of peer-led physical activity programs for older adults: A scoping review. Geriatrics Gerontology and Aging, 18, Article e0000154. https://doi.org/10.53886/gga.e0000154_EN

Barras

Neuhaus

Cyarto

E. V.

Reid

(2021). Effectiveness of peer-led wellbeing interventions in retirement living: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), 11557. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111557

Best

K. L.

Miller

W. C.

Eng

J. J.

Routhier

(2016). Systematic review and meta-analysis of peer-led self-management programs for increasing physical activity. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 23(5), 527–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-016-9540-4

Bueno-Antequera

Munguía-Izquierdo

(2023). Physical inactivity, sedentarism, and low fitness: A worldwide pandemic for public health. In Rezaei

(Ed.). Integrated science of global epidemics (pp. 429–447). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17778-1_19

Buman

M. P.

Giacobbi

P. R.

Dzierzewski

J. M.

Morgan

A. A.

McCrae

C. S.

Roberts

B. L.

Marsiske

(2011). Peer volunteers improve long-term maintenance of physical activity with older adults: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 8(Suppl. 2), S257–S266. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.8.s2.s257

Burton

Farrier

Hill

K. D.

Codde

Airey

Hill

A.-M.

(2018). Effectiveness of peers in delivering programs or motivating older people to increase their participation in physical activity: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 36(6), 666–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2017.1329549

Chelladurai

Saleh

S. D.

(1980). Dimensions of leader behavior in sports: Development of a leadership scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsp.2.1.34

Chong

J. X. Y.

Gagné

(2019). Self-determination theory for work motivation. In Dunn

D. S.

(Eds.), Oxford bibliographies in psychology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199846740-0182

Crist

Full

K. M.

Linke

Tuz-Zahra

Bolling

Lewars

Liu

Shi

Rosenberg

Jankowska

Benmarhnia

Natarajan

(2022). Health effects and cost-effectiveness of a multilevel physical activity intervention in low-income older adults: Results from the PEP4PA cluster randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 19(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01309-w

10.

Egbert

Plonsky

(2020). Bootstrapping techniques. In Paquot

Th. Gries

(Eds.), A practical handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 593–610). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46216-1_24

11.

Fransen

Cruwys

Haslam

Iserbyt

Seghers

Vanderlinden

van Uffelen

Verbaanderd

Boen

(2022). Leading the way together: A cluster randomised controlled trial of the 5R Shared Leadership Program in older adult walking groups. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 19(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01297-x

12.

Gagné

Deci

E. L.

(2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322

13.

Hassen

H. Y.

Ndejjo

Musinguzi

Van Geertruyden

J.-P.

Abrams

Bastiaens

(2021). Effectiveness of community-based cardiovascular disease prevention interventions to improve physical activity: A systematic review and meta-regression. Preventive Medicine, 153, 106797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106797

14.

Hulteen

R. M.

Waldhauser

K. J.

Beauchamp

M. R.

(2019). Promoting health-enhancing physical activity: A state-of-the-art review of peer-delivered interventions. Current Obesity Reports, 8(4), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-019-00366-w

15.

Izumi

B. T.

Schulz

A. J.

Mentz

Israel

B. A.

Sand

S. L.

Reyes

A. G.

Hoston

Richardson

Gamboa

Rowe

Diaz

(2015). Leader behaviors, group cohesion, and participation in a walking group program. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 49(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.01.019

16.

Kane

T. D.

Baltes

T. R.

(1998). Efficacy assessment in complex social domains: Leadership efficacy in small task groups [Paper presentation]. The Annual Meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX, United States.

17.

Katzmarzyk

P. T.

Friedenreich

Shiroma

E. J.

Lee

I.-M.

(2022). Physical inactivity and non-communicable disease burden in low-income, middle-income and high-income countries. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 56(16), 984–990. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-103640

18.

Kohl

H. W.

Craig

C. L.

Lambert

E. V.

Inoue

Alkandari

J. R.

Leetongin

Kahlmeier

(2012). The pandemic of physical inactivity: Global action for public health. The Lancet, 380(9838), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60898-8

19.

Kritz

Ntoumanis

Mullan

Stathi

Thøgersen-Ntoumani

(2021). Volunteer motivation and retention of older peer walk leaders: A 4-month long investigation. The Gerontologist, 61(7), 1118–1130. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa159

20.

Kritz

Thøgersen-Ntoumani

Mullan

McVeigh

Ntoumanis

(2020). Effective peer leader attributes for the promotion of walking in older adults. The Gerontologist, 60(6), 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa014

21.

Kritz

Thøgersen-Ntoumani

Mullan

Stathi

Ntoumanis

(2023). How can older peer leaders best support motivation for walking in physically inactive older adults? A self-determination theory perspective. Psychology & Health, 38(7), 927–948. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2021.1994968

22.

Oostlander

Güntert

S. T.

van Schie

Wehner

(2014). Leadership and volunteer motivation: A study using self-determination theory. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 869–889. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013485158

23.

Rhodes

R. E.

Beauchamp

M. R.

(2024). Development of the social dimensions of health behaviour framework. Health Psychology Review, 18(4), 750–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2024.2339329

24.

Ryan

R. M.

Deci

E. L.

(2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806

25.

Shook

J. L.

Keup

J. R.

(2012). The benefits of peer leader programs: An overview from the literature. New Directions for Higher Education, 2012(157), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20002

26.

Wahlich

Chaudhry

U. A. R.

Fortescue

Cook

D. G.

Hirani

Knightly

Harris

(2020). Effectiveness of adult community-based physical activity interventions with objective physical activity measurements and long-term follow-up: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 10(5), e034541. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034541

27.

Yao

Cogliano

Ramirez

Osiris

Ball

Valencia

Herrera

(2020). Support for peer support: Examining peer leader stress in academic support programs. Learning Assistance Review, 25(2), 1–25.

28.

Yukl

Gordon

Taber

(2002). A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a half century of behavior research. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9, 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190200900102

Motivated and Responsive: Peer-Leader Attributes Supporting Delivery of a National Walking Program

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References