This qualitative research explored how cancer patients’ writing and reading on the Internet play a role in their illness experience. Focus-group interviews were conducted, with 34 cancer patients participating. A grounded qualitative analysis method was applied to analyze the interview transcripts. The results show that by writing personal blogs, cancer patients reconstructed their life story, expressed their closure of life, and expected to be remembered after death. Reading fellow cancer patients’ stories online significantly influenced cancer patients’ perceptions and expectations of their own illness prognosis, and that influence was sometimes greater than that of the doctors’ influence.
AndersonJRaineyMEysenbachG (2003) The impact of cyber healthcare on the physician-patient relationship. Journal of Medical Systems27: 67–84.
2.
BalkaEKruegerGHolmesBJ. (2010) Situating Internet use: Information-seeking among young women with breast cancer. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication15: 389–411.
3.
BerlandGElliotMMoralesL. (2001) Health information of the Internet: Accessibility, quality and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association285: 2612–2621.
4.
BingleyAFMcDermottEThomasC. (2006) Making sense of dying: A review of narratives written since 1950 by people facing death from cancer and other diseases. Palliative Medicine20: 183–195.
5.
BurrowsRNettletonSPleaceN. (2000) Virtual community care? Social policy and the emergence of computer mediated social support. Information, Communication & Society3(1): 95–121.
6.
BylundCLGueguenJAD’AgostinoTA. (2009) Cancer participants’ decisions about discussing Internet information with their doctors. Psycho-Oncology18: 1139–1146.
7.
ChenXSiuLL (2001) Impact of the media and the Internet on oncology: Survey of cancer participants and oncologists in Canada. Journal of Clinical Oncology19: 4291–4297. Available at: http://www.jcojournal.org/content/19/23/4291.short
8.
CheungC (2004) Identity construction and self-presentation on personal homepages: Emancipatory potentials and reality constraints. In: GauntlettDHorsleyR (eds) Web Studies (2nd edn). London: Hodder Arnold, pp. 53–68.
9.
ChiuYC (2011) Probing, impelling, but not offending doctors: The role of the Internet as an information source for patients’ interactions with doctors. Qualitative Health Research21(12): 1658–1666.
10.
ChuechJWS (2001) Exploratory study on the behavior of health Web site users in Taiwan. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, National Yan-Ming University, Taiwan.
GiddensA (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press, p. 71–108.
15.
HardeyM (2002) The story of my illness: Personal accounts of illness on the Internet. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine6(1): 31–46.
16.
HenninkMM (2007) International Focus Group Research: A Handbook for the Health and Social Sciences. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
HøybyeMTJohansenCTjornhoj-ThomsenT (2005) Online interaction. Effects of storytelling in an Internet breast cancer support group. Psycho-Oncology14: 211–220.
18.
HsuL-L (2005) An exploratory study of Taiwanese consumers’ experience of using health-related websites. The Journal of Nursing Research13(2): 129–140.
19.
KingSAMoreggiD (1998) Internet therapy and self-help groups—the pros and cons. In: GackenbachJ (ed.) Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal and Transpersonal Implications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press: 221–244.
20.
KivitsJ (2006) Informed patients and the Internet: A mediated context for consultations with health professionals. Journal of Health Psychology11(2): 269–282.
21.
LiebermanMAGoldsteinBA (2005) Self-help on-line: An outcome evaluation of breast cancer bulletin boards. Journal of Health Psychology10: 855–862.
22.
LocockLBrownJB (2010) ‘All in the same boat’? Patient and carer attitudes to peer support and social comparison in motor neurone disease (MND). Social Science & Medicine (1982)71: 1498–1505.
23.
MurrayELoBPollackL. (2003) The impact of health information in the Internet on the physician-patient relationship: Patient perceptions. Archives of Internal Medicine163: 1727–1734.
24.
OrgadS (2004) Help yourself: The World Wide Web as a self-help agora. In: GauntlettDHorsleyR (eds) Web Studies (2nd edn). London: Hodder Arnold, pp. 146–157.
25.
OverbergRIAlpayLLVerhoefJ. (2007) Illness stories on the Internet: What do breast cancer patients want at the end of treatment?Psycho-Oncology16(10): 937–944.
26.
PembertonPGoldblattJ (1998) The Internet and the changing roles of doctors, participants and families. Medical Journal of Australia169: 594–595. Available at: http://www.mja.com
27.
PennebakerJW (1997) Opening Up: The Healing Power of Expressing Emotions. New York, London: The Guilford Press.
28.
ReevesPM (2001) How individuals coping with HIV/AIDS use the Internet. Health Education Research16(6): 709–719.
29.
RodgersSChenQ (2005) Internet community group participation: Psychosocial benefits for women with breast cancer. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication10: 00, available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/rodgers.html.
30.
ShawBRHanJYHawkinsRP. (2008) Communicating about self and others within an online support group for women with breast cancer and subsequent outcomes. Journal of Health Psychology13(7): 930–939.
31.
StantonALDanoff-burgS (2009) Emotional expression, expressive writing, and cancer. In: LeporeSJSmythJM (eds) The Writing Cure: How Expressive Writing Promotes Health and Emotional Well-being. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 31-51.
32.
SullivanCF (2003) Gendered cybersupport: A thematic analysis of two online cancer support groups. Journal of Health Psychology8: 83–104.
33.
ThomasDR (2006) A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation27: 237–246.
34.
TsengSFChangLM (1998) The content of medical information websites and its usage. The Journal of Taiwan Association for Medical Informatics8: 54–72.
35.
WaljiMSagaramSSagaramD. (2004) Efficacy of quality criteria to identify potential harmful information: A cross-sectional survey of complementary and alternative medicine web sites. Journal of Medical Internet Research6(2): e21.
36.
WenKYMcTavishFKrepsG. (2011) From diagnosis to death: A case study of coping with breast cancer as seen through online discussion group messages. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication16: 331–361.
37.
ZieblandSDumelowCEvansJ. (2004) How the Internet affects participants’ experience of cancer: A qualitative study. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)328: 564–569.
38.
ZimmermanDEAkerelreaCABullerDB. (2003) Integrating usability testing into the development of a 5 a Day Nutrition Website for at-risk populations in the American southwest. Journal of Health Psychology8: 119–134.
