We investigated the effects of gain-framed versus loss-framed messages and motivational orientation on calcium consumption. After completing a motivational orientation scale (behavioral inhibition system/behavioral activation system), undergraduate women (N = 141) were randomly assigned to read a gain-framed or loss-framed pamphlet promoting calcium consumption. Calcium consumption was assessed 1 month later. For calcium supplement behavior, a gain-framed advantage was observed for behavioral activation system–oriented individuals, whereas a loss-framed advantage was observed for behavioral inhibition system–oriented individuals. For dietary calcium intake, a gain-framed advantage was observed among behavioral activation system–oriented individuals; however, no framing effect emerged for behavioral inhibition system–oriented individuals. The success of framed messages depends on the message recipient’s motivational orientation.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
AndersonKDChadKESpinkKS (2005) Osteoporosis knowledge, beliefs, and practices among adolescent females. The Journal of Adolescent Health36: 305–312.
3.
BaileyRLDoddKWGoldmanJA. (2010) Estimation of total usual calcium and vitamin D intakes in the United States. Journal of Nutrition140: 817–822.
4.
CarverCSWhiteTL (1994) Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology67: 319–333.
5.
Food and Nutrition Board (Committee to Review Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin D and Calcium) (2011) DRI Dietary Reference Intakes Calcium Vitamin D. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
6.
GallagherKMUpdegraffJA (2012) Health message framing on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine43: 101–116.
7.
GerendMAShepherdJE (2007) Using message framing to promote acceptance of the human papillomavirus vaccine. Health Psychology26: 745–752.
8.
GrayJA (1990) Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Cognition & Emotion4: 269–288.
9.
HeveyDPertlMThomasK. (2010) Body consciousness moderates the effect of message framing on intentions to use sunscreen. Journal of Health Psychology15: 553–559.
10.
HwangYChoHSandsL. (2012) Effects of gain- and loss-framed messages on the sun safety behavior of adolescents: The moderating role of risk perceptions. Journal of Health Psychology17: 929–940.
11.
IlichJZSkugorMHangartnerT. (1998) Relation of nutrition, body composition and physical activity to skeletal development: A cross-sectional study in preadolescent females. Journal of the American College of Nutrition17:136–147.
12.
JungMEMartin GinisKAPhillipsSM. (2011) Increasing calcium intake in young women through gain-framed, targeted messages: A randomized controlled trial. Psychology & Health26: 531–547.
13.
KahnemanDTverskyA (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica47: 263–291.
14.
LatimerAERiversSERenchTA. (2008) A field experiment testing the utility of regulatory fit messages for promoting physical activity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology44: 826–832.
15.
McGregorLMFergusonEO’CarrollRE (2012) Living organ donation: The effect of message frame on an altruistic behavior. Journal of Health Psychology17: 821–832.
16.
MannTShermanDUpdegraffJ (2004) Dispositional motivations and message framing: A test of the congruency hypothesis in college students. Health Psychology23: 330–334.
17.
NanX (2012) Communicating to young adults about HPV vaccination: Consideration of messageframing, motivation, and gender. Health Communication27: 10–18.
NoarSMBenacCNHarrisMS (2007) Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin133: 673–693.
20.
O’KeefeDJJensenJD (2007) The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication12: 623–644.
21.
O’KeefeDJJensenJD (2009) The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication59: 296–316.
22.
RothmanAJSaloveyP (1997) Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin121: 3–19.
23.
RothmanAJUpdegraffJA (2011) Specifying when and how gain- and loss-framed messages motivate healthy behavior: An integrated approach. In: KerenG (ed.) Perspectives on Framing. New York, NY: Psychology Press, pp. 257–277.
24.
RothmanAJBartelsRDWlaschinJ. (2006) The strategic use of gain- and loss-framed messages to promote health behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication56: S202–S220.
25.
RothmanAJWlaschinJBartelsRD. (2008) How persons and situations regulate message framing effects: The study of health behavior. In: ElliotA (ed.) Handbook of Approach and Avoidance Motivation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., pp. 475–486.
26.
SchmiegeSJAikenLSSanderJL. (2007) Osteoporosis prevention among young women: Psychosocial models of calcium consumption and weight-bearing exercise. Health Psychology26: 577–587.
27.
ShermanDKMannTUpdegraffJA (2006) Approach/avoidance motivation, message framing, and health behavior: Understanding the congruency effect. Motivation and Emotion30: 165–169.
28.
UpdegraffJAShermanDKLuysterFS. (2007) The effects of message quality and congruency on perceptions of tailored health communications. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology43: 249–257.
