Framing preventive care messaging and cervical cancer screening in a health-insured population in South Africa: Implications for population-based communication?

Abstract

The impact of health message framing on cervical cancer screening uptake is poorly understood. In a prospective randomized control study with 748 females, aged 21–65 years with no Pap smear in the previous 3 years, they randomly received a loss-framed, gain-framed, or neutral health message (control) regarding cervical cancer screening by email. Screening rate in the control group was 9.58 percent (CI: 9.29%–9.87%), 5.71 percent (CI: 5.48%–6.98%) in the gain-framed group, and 8.53 percent (CI: 8.24%–8.81%) in the loss-framed group. Statistically there was no difference between the three screening rates. Framing of health messages may not be a significant consideration when communicating through emails.

Keywords

cervical cancer framing health messages screening

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adonis

Luiz

et al . (2013) Provincial screening rates for chronic diseases of lifestyle, cancers and HIV in a health-insured population. South African Medical Journal 103(5): 309–312. DOI: 10.7196/SAMJ.6686.

Adonis

Basu

Luiz

(2014) Predictors of adherence to screening guidelines for chronic diseases of lifestyle, cancers, and HIV in a health-insured population in South Africa. Global Health Action 7: 23807. DOI: 10.3402/gha.v7.23807.

Akl

Oxman

Herrin

et al . (2011) Framing of health information messages. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 12: Article no: CD006777. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006777.pub2.

Aldridge

(2006) Message framing effects in nutrition education. Office of Analysis, Nutrition and Evaluation Food and Nutrition Service, USDA. Available at: http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/LitReview_Framing.pdf (accessed May 2014).

Barratt

(2006) Cancer screening. Benefits, harms, and making an informed choice. Australian Family Physician 35(1): 39–42.

Bartels

Kelly

Rothman

(2010) Moving beyond the function of the health behaviour: The effect of message frame on behavioural decision-making. Psychology & Health 25(7): 821–838. DOI: 10.1080/08870440902893708.

Byrnes

McGoldrick

Crawford

et al . (2007) Cervical screening in general practice. Strategies for improving participation. Australian Family Physician 36(3): 183–185.

Camilloni

Ferroni

Cendales

et al . (2013) Methods to increase participation working Group. Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: A systematic review. BMC Public Health 13: 464.

Centers for Diseases Control (2013) Use of Pap smears among women aged 18 and over, by selected characteristics: United States, selected years 1987–2010. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/2013/084.pdf (accessed May 2014).

10.

Covey

(2014) The role of dispositional factors in moderating message framing effects. Health Psychology 33(1): 52–65. DOI: 10.1037/a0029305.

11.

Dietrich

Tobin

Cassells

et al . (2007) Translation of an efficacious cancer-screening intervention to women enrolled in a Medicaid Managed Care Organization. Annals of Family Medicine 5: 320–327. DOI: 10.1370/afm.701.

12.

Dimitrakakia

Boulamatsisb

Mariolisc

et al . (2009) Use of cancer screening services in Greece and associated social factors: Results from the nation-wide Hellas Health I survey. European Journal of Cancer Prevention 18: 248–257. DOI: 10.1097/CEJ.ob013e32832405d6.

13.

Druckman

(2001) On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? The Journal of Politics 63(4): 1041–1066. DOI: 10.1080/08870440902893708.

14.

DuBard

Schmid

Yow

et al . (2008) Recommendation for and receipt of cancer screenings among Medicaid recipients 50 years and older. Archives of Internal Medicine 168(18): 2014–2021. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.168.18.2014.

15.

Eaker

Adami

H-O

Granath

et al . (2004) A large population-based randomized controlled trial to increase attendance at screening for cervical cancer. Cancer epidemiology. Biomarkers & Prevention 13: 3.

16.

Editorial (2009) The trouble with screening. The Lancet 373: 1223.

17.

Everett

Bryant

Griffin

et al . (2011) Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 5: Article no: CD002834. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub2.

18.

Gainforth

Cao

Latimer-Cheung

(2012) Message framing and parents’ intentions to have their children vaccinated against HPV. Public Health Nursing 29(6): 542–552. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525–1446.2012.01038.x.

19.

Gallagher

Updegraff

(2012) Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavior Medicine 43: 101–116. DOI: 10.1007/s12160–011–9308–7.

20.

Garrido-Cumbrera

Borrell

Palència

et al . (2010) Social class inequalities in the utilization of health care and preventive services in Spain: A country with a national health system. International Journal of Health Services 40(3): 525–542. DOI: 10.1017/s1744133110000277.

21.

Gerend

Shepherd

(2007) Using message framing to promote acceptance of the human papillomavirus vaccine. Health Psychology 26(6): 745–752. DOI: 10.1037/0278–6133.26.6.745.

22.

Hughes

Hannon

Harris

et al . (2010) Health behaviors of employed and insured adults in the United States, 2004–2005. American Journal of Health Promotion 24(5): 315–5323. DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.080603-QUAN-77.

23.

Hull

(2012) Perceived risk as a moderator of the effectiveness of framed HIV-test promotion messages among women: A randomized controlled trial. Health Psychology 31(1): 114–121. DOI: 10.1037/a0024702.

24.

Januszek-Michalecka

Nowak-Markwitz

Banach

et al . (2013) Effectiveness of the national population-based cervical cancer screening programme in Poland—Outcomes, problems and possible solutions 7 years after implementation. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 20(4): 859–864.

25.

Latimer

Salovey

Rothman

(2007) The effectiveness of gain-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behavior: Is all hope lost? Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives 12(7): 645–649. DOI: 10.1080/10810730701619695.

26.

McIntyre

(2010) Private sector involvement in funding and providing health services in South Africa: Implications for equity and access to health care. EQUINET Discussion Paper Series 84 Health Economics Unit (UCT), ISER, Rhodes University, Harare: EQUINET.

27.

Moodley

(2009) Cervical cancer in Southern Africa: The challenges. South African Journal of Gynecological Oncology 1(1): 11–13.

28.

Myers

(2010) Promoting healthy behaviors: How do we get the message across? International Journal of Nursing Studies 47: 500–512. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.017.

29.

O’Keefe

Nan

(2012) The relative persuasiveness of gain- and loss-framed messages for promoting vaccination: A meta-analytic review. Health Communication 27(8): 776–783. DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2011.640974.

30.

O’Keefe

(2012) Gain-framed messages do not motivate sun protection: A meta-analytic review of randomized trials comparing gain-framed and loss-framed appeals for promoting skin cancer prevention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 9: 2121–2133. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph9062121.

31.

OpenEpi Results from OpenEpi, Version 2, open source calculator—SS Cohort. Available at: http://www.openepi.com/oe2.3/SampleSize/SSCohort.htm# (accessed June 2013).

32.

Parkin

Bray

(2006) The burden of HPV-related cancers. Vaccine 24S3: S3/11–S3/25. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.111.

33.

Pimenta

Galindo

Jenkins

et al . (2013) Estimate of the global burden of cervical adenocarcinoma and potential impact of prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccination. BMC Cancer 13: 553.

34.

Rivers

Salovey

Pizarro

et al . (2005) Message framing and Pap test utilization among women attending a community health clinic. Journal of Health Psychology 10: 65. DOI: 10.1177/1359105305048556.

35.

Robertson

(2006) Using Information to Promote Healthy Behaviors. London: King’s Fund (W1G0AN).

36.

Rothman

Salovey

(1997) Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin 121(1): 3–19.

37.

Screening and Immunization Team (2013) Health and Social Care Information Centre. Cervical Cancer Screening Program England 2012–2013. Available at: http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB11889/cerv-scre-prog-eng-2012–13-rep.pdf (accessed May 2014).

38.

South African Department of Health (n.d.) National cervical cancer screening guidelines. Available at: http://screening.iarc.fr/doc/SAcervical-cancer.pdf (accessed May 2014).

39.

Tota

Ramana-Kumar

El-Khatib

et al . (2014) The road ahead for cervical cancer prevention and control. Current Oncology 21: e255–e264. DOI: 10.3747/co.21.1720.

40.

Van’t Riet

Ruiter

Vries De

(2012) Preaching to the choir? The influence of personal relevance on the effects of gain- and loss-framed health promoting messages. Journal of Health Psychology 17: 712–713. DOI: 10.1177/1359105311421047.

41.

Vesco

Whitlock

Eder

et al . (2011) Risk factors and other epidemiologic considerations for cervical cancer screening: A narrative review for the U.S. preventive services task force. Annals of Internal Medicine 155: 698–705.

42.

Weller

Patnick

McIntosh

et al . (2009) Uptake in cancer screening programmes. The Lancet Oncology 10: 693–99. DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70145-7.

43.

Zapka

Lemon

(2004) Interventions for patients, providers, and health care organizations. Cancer 101(5): 1165–1187. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20504.