How can psychological description orient to an experiential understanding inclusive of and sensitive to situated ontological variability? To do so requires development of theory capable of engaging people in the living of their lives reconciling notions of personhood within the prospective nature of psychosocial action. This commentary considers Cromby’s argument and its capacity to realise theory of this kind.
CorcoranT (2009) Second nature. British Journal of Social Psychology48: 375–388.
6.
CorcoranT (in press) Health inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education.
7.
EllisA (1962) Reason and Emotion in Psychotherapy. New York: Lyle Stuart.
8.
HarréR (1995) The necessity of personhood as embodied being. Theory & Psychology5(3): 369–373.
9.
KellyGA (1955) The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: Norton.
10.
MulkanaSSHaileyBJ (2001) The role of optimism in health-enhancing behaviour. American Journal of Health Behaviour25(4): 388–395.
11.
PetersonCBossioLM (1991) Health and Optimism. New York: Free Press.
12.
PotterJ (2010) Contemporary discursive psychology: Issues, prospects, and Corcoran’s awkward ontology. British Journal of Social Psychology49: 657–678.
13.
ShotterJ (2010) Situated dialogic action research: Disclosing ‘beginnings’ for innovative change in organisations. Organisational Research Methods13(2): 268–285.
14.
StennerP (2007) Non-foundational criticality? On the need for a process ontology of the psychosocial. Critical Social Studies2: 44–55.
15.
UbbesVABlackJMAushermanJA (2010) Teaching for understanding in health education: The role of critical and creative thinking skills within constructivism theory. In: BlackJMFurneySRGrafHMNolteAE (eds) Philosophical Foundations of Health Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass, pp. 95–108.
