Research has demonstrated that gender is a barrier to men's participation in self-help groups. In this article I analyse how four men and seven women negotiate their identities as members of cancer self-help groups. Their accounts were transcribed and analysed using a synthetic approach to discursive psychology. Women's accounts were organized around the notion of receiving help whereas men appeared to resist this type of identity. I explore how men attended to the presentation of a masculine identity and focus on how men negotiated `legitimately masculine' reasons to be engaged in self-help groups.
Adamsen, L., Rasmussen, J., & Pedersen, L.S. (2001). `Brothers in arms': How men with cancer experience a sense of comradeship through group intervention which combines physical activity with information relay. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 10, 528-553.
2.
Anderson, B.L. (1992). Psychological intervention for cancer patients to enhance quality of life. Journal of Clinical Psychology , 60, 552-568.
3.
Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: SAGE.
4.
Bui, L.L., Last, L., Bradley, H., Law, C.H.L., Maier, B.-A., & Smith, A.J. (2002). Interest and participation in support group programmes among patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Nursing, 25(2), 150-157.
5.
Bulow, P. (2004). Sharing experiences of contested illness by storytelling . Discourse & Society, 15(1), 33-53.
6.
Cella, D.F., & Yellen, S. (1993). Cancer support groups: The state of the art. Cancer Practice, 1(1), 56-62.
7.
Connell, R.W. (1987). Gender and power. Cambridge : Polity Press.
8.
Davies, B. & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves . Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43-63.
9.
De Souza, P., & Ciclitira, K. (2005). Men and dieting: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Health Psychology, 10(6), 793-804.
10.
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London : SAGE.
11.
Fitch, M. (2000). Supportive care for cancer patients. Hospital Quarterly, 3(4), 39-46.
12.
Frosh, S., Phoenix, A., & Pattman, R. (2002). Young masculinities. Basingstoke : Palgrave.
13.
Gough, B., & Conner, M. (forthcoming). Barriers to healthy eating amongst men: A qualitative analysis.
14.
Gray, R.E. (2001). Cancer self-help groups are here to stay: Issues and challenges for health professionals. Journal of Palliative Care, 17(1), 53-58.
15.
Gray, R., & Fitch, M. (2001). Cancer self-help groups are here to stay: Issues and challenges for health professionals. Journal of Palliative Care, 17(1), 53-58.
16.
Gray, R.E., Fitch, M., Davies, C., & Phillips, C. (1997). Interviews with men with prostate cancer about their self-help group experience. Journal of Palliative Care , 13(1), 15-21.
17.
Gray, R.E., Fitch, M.I., Fergus, K.D., Mykhalovskiy, E., & Church, K. (2002). Hegemonic masculinity and the experience of prostate cancer: A narrative approach. Journal of Aging & Identity , 7, 43-62.
18.
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis. Cambridge : Polity Press.
19.
Jefferson, G. (1990). List construction as a task and resource. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Interaction competence, 63-92. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
20.
Klemm, P., Hurst, M., Dearholt, S.L., & Trone, S.R. (1999). Cyber solace: Gender differences on internet cancer support groups. Computers in Nursing, 17, 65-72.
21.
Moynihan, C. (1987). Testicular cancer: The psychosocial problems of patients and their relatives. Cancer Surveys, 6(3), 477-510.
22.
Pomerantz, A.M. (1987). Description in legal settings. In G. Button and J. R. E. Lee (Ed.), Talk and social organisation, 226-43. Cleavedon: Multilingual Matters.
23.
Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: SAGE .
24.
Potter, J. (2005). Making psychology relevant. Discourse and Society, 16(5), 739-747.
25.
Riessman, C.K. (2002). Analysis of personal narratives. In J. F. Gubrium and J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method . Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
26.
Sacks, H. (1984). On doing `Being Ordinary'. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 413-29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Salem, D.A., Bogart, G.A., & Reid, C. (1997). Mutual help goes on-line. Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 189-207.
Seymour-Smith, S., Wetherell, M., & Phoenix, A. (2002). `My wife ordered me to come!': A discursive analysis of doctors' and nurses' accounts of men's use of general practitioners. Journal of Health Psychology, 7(3), 253-267.
30.
Spinney, L. (1995). A virtual shoulder to cry on. New Scientist, 148, 36-41.
31.
Stokoe, E. (2003). Doing gender, doing categorization: Recent developments in language and gender research. International Sociolinguistics , 2(1), 1-12.
32.
Thiel de Bocanegra, H. (1992). Cancer patients interest in group support programs . Cancer Nursing, 15, 347-352.
Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9(3), 387-412.
35.
Wetherell, M., & Edley, N. (1998). Gender practices: Steps in the analysis of men and masculinities. In K. Henwood, C. Griffin, & A. Phoenix (Eds.), Standpoints and differences: Essays in the practice of feminist psychology, 22-49. London: SAGE.
36.
Wetherell, M., & Edley, N. (1999). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and psych-discursive practices. Feminism & Psychology , 9(3), 335-356.
37.
Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation analysis and discourse analysis. London: SAGE.
