From a metatheoretical critical perspective wary of theoretical dualisms, this commentary endorses Cromby’s integrative proposal on the fusion of thought and affect. The proposal is discussed in relation to the current ‘turn to affect’ in the social sciences and to recent work in feminist theory. Specific arguments on the relation of cognition and discourse are appraised critically.
AlcoffLPotterE (eds) (1993) Feminist Epistemologies. New York: Routledge.
2.
BrennanT (2004) The Transmission of Affect. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
3.
CloughPT (2007) The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
DemosEV (ed.) (1995) Exploring Affect: The Selected Writings of Silvan S. Tomkins. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
FalmagneRJ (2009) Subverting theoretical dualisms: Mentalism and discourse. Theory and Psychology19(6): 795–815.
6.
FalmagneRJ (2011) The affective roots of thought. In: StennerPCrombyJMotzkauJYenJ (eds) Theoretical Psychology: Global Transformations and Challenges. Concord, ON: Captus, pp. 129–138.
7.
GrecoMStennerP (2008) Emotion: A Social Science Reader. London: Routledge.
8.
HarmanG (1986) Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. Cambridge: Bradford Books.
9.
JaggarA (1996) Love and knowledge: Emotion in feminist epistemology. In: GarryAPearsallM (eds) Women, Knowledge and Reality. New York: Routledge, pp. 166–190.
10.
JohnsonM (2007) The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
McIlwainD (2007) Pleasure in mind: Silvan Tomkins and affect in aesthetics, personality theory and culture. Theory and Psychology17(4): 499–504.
12.
TuanaNMorgenS (2001) Engendering Rationalities. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
