Most patients are decisionally incapacitated at the end of life, leaving final treatment decisions to proxies, whose substituted judgment is often inaccurate. We investigated the reluctance to burden others (RBO), a commonly cited patient value, as a possible source of proxy inaccuracy. In a sample of 202 elders and their proxies, elders responded to three burden-related questions and the Life-prolonging Treatment Preferences Questionnaire. Proxies used substituted judgment to respond to the same questions. Although RBO predicted treatment preferences for both elders and proxies, elders rated RBO significantly more important than did proxies. In addition, larger elder–proxy differences in RBO were associated with more inaccurate substituted judgment.
AshbyMOp’t HoogCKellehearA. (2005) Renal dialysis abatement: Lessons for a social study. Palliative Medicine19(5): 389–396.
2.
BookwalaJCoppolaKMFagerlinADittoPHDanksJHSmuckerWD (2001) Gender differences in older adults’ preferences for life-sustaining medical treatments and end-of-life values. Death Studies25(2): 127–149.
3.
Cohen-MansfieldJDrogeJABilligN (1992) Factors influencing hospital patients’ preferences in the utilization of life-sustaining treatments. The Gerontologist22(1): 89–95.
4.
CoppolaKMBookwalaJDittoPHLockhartLKDanksJHSmuckerWD (1999) Elderly adults’ preferences for life-sustaining treatments: The role of impairment, prognosis, and pain. Death Studies23(7): 617–634.
5.
DegenholtzHBRheeYArnoldRM (2004) Brief communication: The relationship between having a living will and dying in place. Annals of Internal Medicine141(2): 113–117.
6.
DeteringKMHancockADReadeMCSilvesterW (2010) The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)340: c1345.
7.
DoukasDJGorenfloDW (1993) Analyzing the values history: An evaluation of patient medical values and advance directives. Journal of Clinical Ethics4(1): 41–45.
8.
DoukasDJMcCulloughLA (1991) The values history: The evaluation of the patient’s values and advance directives. Journal of Family Practice32(2): 145–153.
9.
DoukasDJAntonucciTGorenfloDW (1992) A multigenerational study on the correlation of values and advance directives. Ethics and Behavior2(1): 51–59.
10.
FagerlinADittoPHDanksJHHoutsRMSmuckerWD (2001) Projection in surrogate decisions about life-sustaining medical treatments. Health Psychology20(3): 166–175.
11.
FieldMJCasselCK (1997) Approaching Death: Improving Care at the End of Life. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
12.
HareJPrattCNelsonC (1992) Agreement between patients and their self-selected surrogates on difficult medical decision. Archives of Internal Medicine152(5): 1049–1054.
13.
JeckerNS (1993) Being a burden on others. Journal of Clinical Ethics4(1): 16–20.
14.
MarksMAZArkesHR (2008) Patient and surrogate disagreement in end-of-life decisions: Can surrogates accurately predict patients’ preferences?Medical Decision Making28(4): 524–531.
15.
McPhersonCJWilsonKGMurrayMA (2007) Feeling like a burden to others: A systematic review focusing on the end of life. Palliative Medicine21(2): 115–128.
16.
MeadGEO’KeefeSTJackCIMaestri-BanksAMPlayferJRLyeM (1995) Journal of the Royal College of Physicians London29(4): 295–298.
17.
RoccaforteWHBurkeWJBayerBLWengelSP (1992) Validation of a telephone version of the Mini-Mental State Examination. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society40(7): 697–702.
18.
SehgalAGalbraithAChesneyMSchoenfeldPCharlesGLoB (1992) How strictly do dialysis patients want their advance directives followed?Journal of the American Medical Association267(1): 59–63.
19.
ShalowitzDIGarrett-MayerEWendlerD (2006) The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: A systematic review. Archives of Internal Medicine166(5): 493–497.
20.
SilveiraMJSchneiderCE (2004) Common sense and compassion: Planning for the end of life. Clinics in Family Practice6(2): 349–369.
21.
SilveiraMJKimSYLangaKM (2010) Advance directives and outcomes of surrogate decision making before death. New England Journal of Medicine362(13): 1211–1218.
22.
SingerPAMartinDKKelnerM (1999) Quality end-of-life care. Journal of the American Medical Association281(2): 163–168.
23.
SteinhauserKEChristakisNAClippECMcNeillyMMcIntyreLTulskyJA (2000a) Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers. Journal of the American Medical Association284(19): 2476–2482.
24.
SteinhauserKEClippECMcNeillyMChristakisNAMcIntyreLMTulskyJA (2000b) In search of a good death: Observations of patients, families, and providers. Annals of Internal Medicine132(10): 825–832.
25.
TenoJMGruneirASchwartzZNandaAWetleT (2007) Association between advance directives and quality of end-of-life care: A national study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society55(2): 189–194.
26.
TomlinsonTHoweKNotmanMRossmillerD (1990) An empirical study of proxy consent for elderly persons. The Gerontologist30(1): 54–64.
27.
WinterL (2011) How well do end-of-life values predict wishes for life-prolonging medical treatments?Manuscript under review.
28.
WrightAAZhangBRayA. (2008) Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association300(14): 1665–1673.
29.
Zettel-WatsonLDittoPHDanksJHSmuckerWD (2008) Actual and perceived gender differences in the accuracy of surrogate decisions about life-sustaining medical treatment among older spouses. Death Studies32(3): 273–290.
30.
ZhangBWrightAAHuskampHA. (2009) Health care costs in the last week of life: Associations with end-of-life conversations. Archives of Internal Medicine169(5): 480–488.
31.
ZweibelNRCasselCK (1989) Treatment choices at the end of life: A comparison of decisions of older patients and their physician-selected proxies. The Gerontologist29(5): 615–621.
