Spouses often seek to influence the health behaviors of chronically ill partners, but little research has examined whether spouses find such involvement to be burdensome. The current study examined this question in a sample of 191 nondiabetic spouses whose partners had type 2 diabetes. Results revealed that spouses who attempted to exert more control over their partners’ dietary behavior experienced greater burden, particularly when their partners exhibited poor dietary adherence and reacted negatively to spouses’ involvement. The findings contribute to a sparse body of knowledge on how spouses are affected by efforts to influence their chronically ill partners’ disease management.
American Diabetes Association (2010) Standards of medical care in diabetes - 2010. Diabetes Care33(Suppl. 1): S11-S61.
2.
August KJ and Sorkin DH ( 2010) Marital status and gender differences in managing a chronic illness: The function of health-related social control. Social Science and Medicine71(10): 1831-1838.
3.
Baanders AN and Heijmans Mjwm ( 2007) The impact of chronic diseases: The partner’s perspective . Family and Community Health30(4): 305-317.
4.
Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E., Finkenauer C. and Vohs KD ( 2001) Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology5(4): 323-370.
5.
Berkman LF, Glass T., Brissette I. and Seeman TE ( 2000) From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science and Medicine51(6): 843-857.
6.
Beverly EA, Penrod J. and Wray LA ( 2007) Living with type 2 diabetes: Marital perspectives of middle-aged and older couples. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing45(2): 25-32.
7.
Coyne JC and Smith DAF ( 1991) Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: A contextual perspective on wives’ distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology61(3): 404-412.
8.
Coyne JC, Wortman CB and Lehman DR ( 1988) The other side of support: Emotional overinvolvement and miscarried helping. In: Gottlieb BH (ed.) Marshaling Social Support: Formats, Processes, and Effects. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 305-330.
9.
Denham SA, Manoogian MM and Schuster L. ( 2007) Managing family support and dietary routines: Type 2 diabetes in rural Appalachian families. Families, Systems, and Health25(1): 36-52.
10.
Ell K. ( 1996) Social networks, social support, and coping with serious illness: The family connection. Social Science and Medicine42(2): 173-183.
11.
Fisher L., Chesla CA, Bartz RJ, et al. (1998) The family and type 2 diabetes: A framework for intervention. Diabetes Educator24(5): 599-607.
12.
Franks MM, Wendorf CA, Gonzalez R. and Ketterer M. ( 2004) Aid and influence: Health-promoting exchanges of older married partners. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships21(4): 431-445.
13.
Koerner SS and Kenyon DB ( 2007) Understanding ‘good days’ and ‘bad days’: Emotional and physical reactivity among caregivers for elder relatives. Family Relations56(1): 1-11.
14.
Lewis MA and Butterfield RM ( 2005) Antecedents and reactions to health-related social control . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin31(3): 416-427.
15.
Lewis MA and Rook KS ( 1999) Social control in personal relationships: Impact on health behaviors and psychological distress. Health Psychology18(1): 63-71.
16.
Martire LM, Stephens MAP, Druley JA and Wojno WC ( 2002) Negative reactions to received spousal care: Predictors and consequences of miscarried support. Health Psychology21(2): 167-176.
17.
McNabb WL ( 1997) Adherence in diabetes: Can we definite it and can we measure it? Diabetes Care20(2): 215-218.
18.
Miller D. and Brown JL ( 2005) Marital interactions in the process of dietary change for type 2 diabetes. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior37(5): 226-234.
19.
Muller D., Judd CM and Yzerbyt VY ( 2005) When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology89(6): 852-863.
20.
Newsom JT, Rook KS, Nishishiba M, Sorkin DH and Mahan TL ( 2005) Understanding the relative importance of positive and negative social exchanges: Examining specific domains and appraisals. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences60B(6): P304-P312.
21.
Norton R. ( 1983) Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and the Family45(1): 141-151.
22.
Preacher KJ and Hayes AF ( 2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers36(4): 717-731.
23.
Preacher KJ and Hayes AF ( 2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods40(3): 879-891.
24.
Radloff LS ( 1977) The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychology and Measurement1(3): 385-401.
25.
Rees T. and Freedman P. ( 2009) Social support moderates the relationship between stressors and task performance through self-efficacy. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology28(2): 244-263.
26.
Revenson TA, Abraidod-Lanza AF, Majerovitz SD and Jordan C. ( 2005) Couples coping with chronic illness: What’s gender got to do with it? In: Revenson TA , Kayser K and Bodenmann G (eds) Couples Coping with Stress: Emerging Perspectives on Dyadic Coping. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 137-156.
27.
Rook KS ( 1990) Social networks as a source of social control in older adults’ lives. In: Giles H , Coupland N and Wiemann J (eds) Communication, Health, and the Elderly . Manchester: University of Manchester Press, 45-63.
28.
Rook KS ( 1998) Investigating the positive and negative sides of personal relationships: Through a lens darkly? In: Spitzberg BH, Cupach WR (eds) The Dark Side of Close Relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 369-393.
29.
Rook KS and Ituarte PH ( 1999) Social control, social support, and companionship in older adults’ family relationships and friendships. Personal Relationships6(2): 199-211.
30.
Rook KS, Thuras PD and Lewis MA ( 1990) Social control, health risk taking, and psychological distress among the elderly. Psychology and Aging5(3): 327-334.
31.
Sales E. ( 2003) Family burden and quality of life. Quality of Life Research12(Suppl. 1): 33-41.
32.
Seltzer JA ( 2004) Cohabitation in the United States and Britain: Demography, kinship and the future. Journal of Marriage and Family66(4): 921-928.
33.
Shrout PE and Bolger N. ( 2002) Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods7(4): 422-445.
34.
Stephens MAP, Fekete E., Franks MM, Rook KS, Druley JA and Greene K. ( 2009) Spouses’ use of persuasion and pressure to promote patients’ medical adherence after orthopedic surgery. Health Psychology28(1): 48-55.
35.
Trief PM, Sandberg J., Greenberg RP, et al. (2003) Describing support: A qualitative study of couples living with diabetes. Families, Systems, and Health21(1): 57-67.
36.
Tucker JS ( 2002) Health-related social control within older adults’ relationships. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences57B(5): P387-P395.
37.
Tucker JS and Anders SL ( 2001) Social control of health behaviors in marriage . Journal of Applied Social Psychology31(3): 467-485.
38.
Umberson D. ( 1987) Family status and health behaviors: Social control as a dimension of social integration. Journal of Health and Social Behavior28(3): 306-319.
39.
Umberson D. ( 1992) Gender, marital status and the social control of health behavior. Social Science and Medicine34(8): 907-917.
40.
Vitaliano PP, Zhang J. and Scanlan JM ( 2003) Is care-giving hazardous to one’s health? A meta-analysis . Psychological Bulletin129(6): 946-972.
41.
Welch GW, Jacobson AM and Polonsky WH ( 1997) The Problem Areas in Diabetes scale: An evaluation of its clinical utility. Diabetes Care20(5): 760-766.
