Although meat consumption plays a significant role for individual and public health, there is only little empirical research on the motives of meat consumption informed by health psychology and hardly any on socio-political commitments concerning general meat production taking on a public health perspective. To fill this gap, a questionnaire study was conducted to examine the links between both disciplines. Correlational and multiple regression analyses reveal that individual meat consumption is primarily based on self-centred judgments of control beliefs protecting ones health and of taste, whereas socio-political commitments are based on a mixture of selfcentred judgments and animal ethics. Based on these results, it is concluded, that models on health behaviour should integrate the social perspective, and that in intervention programs issues of individual as well as public health should be given equal importance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Some unresolved issues . Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211 .
2.
Becker, M. H., & Rosenstock, I. M. (1974). Socialpsychological research on determinants of preventive health behavior. In R. L. Kane (Ed.), The behavioral sciences and preventive medicine: Opportunities and dilemmas(pp. 25–35). Washington: DHEW Publication No. (NIH) 76–878.
3.
Block, L. G., & Keller, P. A. (1998). Beyond protection motivation: An integrative theory of health appeals . Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(17), 1584–1608 .
4.
Borg-Laufs, M., & Duda, L. (1991). Zur sozialen rekonstruktion von geschmackswahrnehmung [About social reconstruction of the sense of taste]. Braunschweig: Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft .
5.
Calkins, A. (1979). Observation on vegetarian dietary practice and social factors: The need for further research . Journal of American Dietetic Association, 74(3), 353–355 .
6.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology . Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354 .
7.
Curry, S. J., & Emmons, K. M. (1994). Theoretical models for predicting and improving compliance with breast cancer screening . Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 16(4), 302–316 .
8.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ern‰hrung e.V. [German Nutrition Society]. (2000). Ern‰hrungsbericht [Nutrition report]. Frankfurt am Main: DGE .
9.
Diehl, J. M. (1983). Dimensionen der Nahrungspr‰ferenz [Dimensions of food preference] . Ern‰hrungs-umschau[Nutrition survey], 30(9), 304–309 .
10.
Dlugosch, G. E. (1994). Modelle in der gesundheitspsychologie [Models in health psychology]. In P. Schwenkmezger & L. R. Schmidt (Eds.), Lehrbuch der gesundheitspsycholgie[Textbook of health psychology] (pp. 101–117). Stuttgart: Enke .
11.
Ewart, C. K. (1991). Social Action Theory for a public health psychology . American Psychologist, 46, 931–946 .
12.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company .
13.
Folkers, D. (1988). Verbrauchermeinungen zu fleischersatz aus pflanzeneiweiß [Consumer beliefs concerning plant protein as meat alternative] . Planung und Analyse[Strategy and Analysis], 15(3), 138–139 .
14.
Frhlich, P. (2000). Tierethische und gesundheitsbezogene motive von entscheidungen und engagementbereitschaften für die einschr‰nkung der industriellen nutztierhaltung [Animal- and healthrelated motives of decisions and engagements to reduce industrial meat production]. Unverffentlichte diplomarbeit [unpublished diploma thesis]. Trier: Universit‰t, Fachbereich I— Psychologie.
15.
Glatzel, H. (1984). Nahrung und ern‰hrung[Food and nutrition]. Berlin: Springer .
16.
Gochman, D. S. (Ed.). (1988). Health behavior. New York: Plenum Press .
17.
Haber, W., & Salzwedel, J. (Eds.). (1992). Umweltprobleme in der landwirtschaft[Environment problems in agriculture]. Stuttgart: Carl Ernst Poeschel (Rat von Sachverst‰ndigen für Umweltfragen) [Council of experts concerning environmental questions].
18.
Hapke, H. J. (1994). Fleischverzehr aus mikrobiologischer und toxikologischer sicht [Meat consumption in the point of microbiological and toxicological view]. In R. Kluthe & H. Kasper (Eds.), Fleisch in der ern‰hrung[Meat in nutrition] (pp. 44–51). Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag .
19.
Harril, I., Erber, C., & Schwartz, C. (1979). Observation on food acceptance by elderly women . Gerontologist, 16, 349–355 .
20.
Heim, E., & Willi, J. (Eds.). (1986). Psychosoziale medizin[Psychosocial medicine], vol. 2. Berlin: Springer .
21.
Held, E. (1997). Ethische, gesundheitsbezogene undkologische motive von entscheidungen für fleischkonsum und artgerechte nutztierhaltung[Ethical, health-related and ecological motives of decisions concerning meat consumption and the keeping of farm animals appropriate to species]. Unverffentlichte diplomarbeit [unpublished diploma thesis]. Trier: Universit‰t, Fachbereich I—Psychologie.
22.
Hirt, H. (1996). Durch zucht bedingte haltungsprobleme am beispiel der mastputen[Keeping problems in consequence of breeding at the example of the fattening turkey hens] . Vortrag im rahmen der internationalen tagung ‘tierzucht und ethik in der landwirtschaft—probleme, analysen, perspektiven’ vom 22. bis 24.2.1996 [Presentation within the context of the international conference ‘breeding and ethics in agriculture—problems, analysis, prospects’]. Typoskript, Salzburg.
23.
Kals, E. (1996). Verantwortliches umweltverhalten [Responsible ecological behaviour]. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union .
24.
Kals, E. (2001). Responsibility appraisals of health protection. In H.-W. Bierhoff & A. E. Auhagen (Eds.), Responsibility—the many faces of a social phenomenon(pp. 127–138). London/New York: Routledge .
25.
Kals, E., Held, E., & Montada, L. (1999). Persnlicher fleischkonsum und gesellschaftspolitische engagements mit folgen für die allgemeine fleischproduktion: ein vergleich ihrer motivationalen grundlagen [Individual consumption of meat products and socio-political commitments with relevance for the general meat production: A comparison of their underlying motives] . Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie[Journal of Health Psychology], 7(1), 1–20 .
26.
Kals, E., & Montada, L. (1998). Persnlicher gesundheitsschutz im spiegel sozialer verantwortung. [Individual health protection in the scope of social responsibility] . Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie[Journal of Health Psychology], 6, 3–18 .
27.
Kals, E., & Montada, L. (2001). Health behavior: An interlocking personal and social task . Journal of Health Psychology, 6(2), 131–148 .
28.
Kals, E., & Odenthal, D. (1996). ‘ber die motive von entscheidungen für konventionelle oder kontrolliertbiologische nahrungsmittel [Motives underlying decisions for choosing products from alternative or conventional farming] . Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie[Journal of Health Psychology], 4, 37–54 .
29.
Kluthe, R., & Kasper, H. (Eds.). (1994). Fleisch in der ern‰hrung[Meat in nutrition]. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme .
30.
Laaser, U. (1994). The contribution of the schools of public health to public health in Europe . Zeitschrift für Gesundheitswissenschaften[Journal of Health Sciences], 2, 109–118 .
31.
Lück, H. E., & Timaeus, E. (1969). Skalen zur messung manifester angst (MAS) und sozialer wünschbarkeit (SDS-E und SDS-CM) [Scales for the measurement of manifested anxiety (MAS) and social desirability (SDS-E and SDS-CM)] . Diagnostica, 15, 134–141 .
32.
Maes, S., Spielberger, C. D., Defares, P. B., & Sarason, I. G. (Eds.). (1988). Topics in health psychology. Chichester: Wiley .
33.
Montada, L., & Kals, E. (1998). A theory of ‘ willingness for continued responsible commitment’: Research examples from the fields of pollution control and health protection.(Berichte aus der arbeitsgruppe ‘Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit, Moral’ [Reports from the task force ‘Responsibility, Justice, Moral’] Nr. 114.) Trier: Universit‰t Trier, Fachbereich I—Psychologie .
34.
Naether, E. A. (1987). Gesunde ern‰hrung—nur ein trend oder ein neues bewußtsein? [Healthy nutrition—just a vogue or a new awareness?] . Planung und Analyse[Strategy and Analysis], 14(11/12), 456–461 .
35.
Prentice-Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (1986). Protection Motivation Theory and preventive health: Beyond the Health Belief Model . Health Education Research, 1, 153–161 .
36.
Pudel, V. (1994). Psychologische aspekte des fleischverzehrs [Psychological aspects of meat consumption]. In R. Kluthe & H. Kasper (Eds.), Fleisch in der ern‰hrung[Meat in nutrition] (pp. 14–17). Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag .
Schmidt, L. R. (1994). Public health. In P. Schwenkmezger & L. R. Schmidt (Eds.), Lehrbuch der gesundheitspsychologie[Textbook of health psychology] (pp. 207–221). Stuttgart: Enke .
39.
Schmidt, L. R., Schwenkmezger, P., Weinman, J., & Maes, S. (Eds.). (1990). Theoretical and applied aspects of health psychology. Chur: Harwood .
40.
Schwarzer, R. (Ed.). (1990). Gesundheitspsychologie. Ein lehrbuch.[Health psychology. A textbook]. Gttingen: Hogrefe .
41.
Seydel, E., Taal, E., & Wiegman, O. (1990). Riskappraisal, outcome and self-efficacy expectancies: Cognitive factors in preventive behavior related to cancer . Psychology and Health, 4, 99–109 .
42.
Silverstone, T. (Ed.). (1976). Appetite and food intake: Report of the Dahlem Workshop on Appetite and Food Intake. Berlin: Abakon .
43.
Sommer, H. (1984). ÷kologische orientierung in der tierzucht und tierproduktion [Ecological orientation in breeding and animal production]. In H. van Staa & J. Willi (Eds.), Landwirtschaft—umwelt— gesundheit[Agriculture—environment—health] (pp. 14–28). Innsbruck: Kommissionsverlag .
44.
Stroebe, W., & Stroebe, M. S. (1995). Social psychology and health. Buckingham: Open University Press .
45.
Velicer, W. F., Diclemente, C. C., Rossi, J. S., & Prochaska, J. O. (1990). Relapse situations and selfefficacy: An integrative model . Addictive Behavior, 15, 271–283 .
46.
Von Weizs‰cker, E. U. (1994). Erdpolitik: ÷kologische realpolitik an der schwelle zum jahrhundert der umwelt[Earth politics: Ecological real politics at the threshold to the century of the environment]. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft .
47.
Weisburger, J. H. (1994). Fleischkonsum, karzinogenese und herz- und kreislauferkrankungen [Meat consumption, development of cancer and illnesses of heart and circulation]. In R. Kluthe & H. Kasper (Eds.), Fleisch in der ern‰hrung[Meat in nutrition] (pp. 68–74). Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag .
48.
Winett, R. A., King, A. C., & Altman, D. G. (1989). Health psychology and public health. An integrative approach. New York: Pergamon .
49.
Wlfing-Kast, S., & Tanner, C. (1997). Welche faktoren hemmen bzw. frdern den kauf kologisch produzierter lebensmittel? [Which kind of factors hinder and/or promote the purchase of ecologically produced food?] Darstellung eines psychologischen teilprojektes [Description of a psychological project] (TP7). Typoskript, Universit‰t Bern: Institut für Psychologie .
