Abstract
Objective
Previous research has yielded mixed findings regarding the validity of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) DSM-Oriented Scales (DOSs) in identifying DSM diagnoses. The present study evaluates the concurrent validity of the DOSs by comparing scale classifications with a gold-standard clinical interview.
Methods
Participants (N = 11,851) were children in the NIH Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study whose caregivers completed the CBCL and the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (KSADS) semi-structured interview at baseline (9.92 years, SD = 0.63), two-year follow-up (12.03 years, SD = 0.67), or both.
Results
2,321 (19.59%) children at baseline and 1,708 (15.57%) participants at two-year follow-up met criteria for one or more KSADS disorders. Sensitivity of the CBCL relative to KSADS diagnoses was generally low (10.36% - 75.00%), with only two scales above 50%. Specificity was high (92.47% - 97.07%). Positive predictive values were low (0.71% - 48.20%), and negative predictive values were high (89.84% - 99.90%). Area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.55 to 0.84.
Discussion
In the present sample, the DOSs showed poor concurrent validity with a gold standard clinical interview. Caution should be exercised when using the CBCL due to the high rates of false negatives.
Plain Language Summary
The Child Behavior Checklist is a commonly used questionnaire for caregivers to rate symptoms of mental health conditions in children. Previous research shows conflicting support for the accuracy of the questionnaire results. This study examined how well scores on the questionnaire matched diagnoses based on a gold-standard diagnostic interview. Results showed the questionnaire identified fewer children with mental health concerns than the diagnostic interview. Given that the CBCL under identified children with mental health concerns, this study urges caution when using the questionnaire as part of a diagnostic evaluation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
