Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-7
Evaluating staff views and understanding of the crisis and home treatment service (CAHTS): A mixed-methods study within the child and adolescent mental health service (CAMHS)
The number of children and young people (CYP) experiencing mental health crises in the UK is increasing. The NHS Long Term Plan (2019) prioritises crisis care for CYP. There is a lack of research and understanding into staff views and understandings of these services. The Crisis and Home Treatment Service (CAHTS) is a service within Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) across Bath and Northeast Somerset, Swindon, and Wiltshire (BSW) and is a key component of the crisis mental health care for CYP. The aims of this study were to gain an insight into staff’s views and understandings of the CAHTS, and to explore and identify areas for improvement for future practice and policy for the CAHTS.
Methods
The study employed a mixed-methods design, obtaining quantitative and qualitative data, by distributing online surveys (n = 37) and semi-structured interviews (n = 9) to gather staff views and understandings. Participants were recruited by opportunistic sampling. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and a thematic analysis was undertaken.
Results
Participants ‘agreed’ that CAHTS were acting in accordance with their core principles and were ‘highly likely’ to use the service in the future. The thematic analysis revealed seven themes, the four most dominant themes identified were: good qualities of the CAHT service, working collaboratively, good clinician skills and understaffed for demand.
Conclusions
The data provides insight into staff’s views and understandings of the CAHTS. From the themes derived, the study identified various implications for the CAHTS including further training for staff.
Plain language summary
This study focuses on staff views and understanding of the new Crisis and Home Treatment Service, and provides qualitative data, recommendations for the service, conclusions and implications.
BegumR.RiordanS. (2016). Nurses experiences of working in crisis resolution home treatment teams with its additional gatekeeping responsibilities. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 23(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12276
2.
BoegeI.CorpusN.WeichardM.SchepkerR.YoungP.FegertJ. M. (2021). Long‐term outcome of intensive home treatment for children and adolescents with mental health problems–4 years after a randomized controlled clinical trial. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 26(4), 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12500
BraunV.ClarkeV., (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide.
5.
BraunV.ClarkeV.BoultonE.DaveyL.McEvoyC. (2020). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550
6.
CleeC.ArandaK. (2020). Pressures, pride and solace: CAMHS mental health nurses’ experience of working with young people at risk of suicide in the community. British Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 9(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjmh.2019.0009
7.
CreswellJ. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
8.
DuffyF.SkeldonJ. (2014). A CAMHS intensive treatment service: Clinical outcomes in the first year. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 19(1), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104512468287
EdwardsD.CarrierJ.CsontosJ.EvansN.ElliottM.GillenE.HanniganB.LaneR.WilliamsL. (2023). Review: Crisis responses for children and young people – a systematic review of effectiveness, experiences, and service organisation (CAMH-Crisis). Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 29(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12639
11.
EvansN.EdwardsD.CarrierJ.ElliotM.GillenE.HanniganM.WilliamsL. (2022). Crisis responses for children and young people: An evidence synthesis of effectiveness, experiences and service organisation (CAMH-Crisis). Health Services and Delivery Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12639
HaxellA. J. (2015). On becoming textually active at Youthline, New Zealand. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 43(1), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2014.922163
JohnsonS.Dalton-LockeC.BakerJ.HanlonC.SalisburyT. T.FosseyM.NewbiggingK.CarrS. E.HenselJ.CarràG.HeppU.CaneoC.NeedleJ. J.Lloyd-EvansB. (2022). Acute psychiatric care: Approaches to increasing the range of services and improving access and quality of care. World Psychiatry, 21(2), 220–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20962
17.
KnappM.McDaidD.ParsonageM. (2011). Mental health promotion and mental illness prevention: The economic case. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/32311/
18.
KwokK. H. R.YuanS. N. V.OugrinD. (2016). Review: Alternatives to inpatient care for children and adolescents with mental health disorders. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 21(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12123
MackiesonP.ShlonskyA.ConnollyM. (2019). Increasing rigor and reducing bias in qualitative research: A document analysis of parliamentary debates using applied thematic analysis. Qualitative Social Work, 18(6), 965–980. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325018786996
22.
McNicholasF.SharmaS.OconnorC.BarrettE. (2020). Burnout in consultants in child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS) in Ireland: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 10(1), Article e030354. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030354
23.
MorantN.Lloyd-EvansB.LambD.FullartonK.BrownE.PatersonB.IsteadH.KellyK.HindleD.FahmyS.HendersonC.MasonO.JohnsonS.CORE Service User and Carer Working groups. (2017). Crisis resolution and home treatment: Stakeholders’ views on critical ingredients and implementation in England. BMC Psychiatry, 17(1), 254–313. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1421-0
24.
National Assembly for Wales Children, Young People and Education Committee. (2018). Mind over matter. A report on the step change needed in emotional and mental health support for children and young people in Wales. https://senedd.wales/laiddocuments/cr-ld11522/cr-ld11522-e.pdf
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Sage.
31.
PolanczykG. V.SalumG. A.SugayaL. S.CayeA.RohdeL. A. (2015). Annual research review: A meta-analysis of the worldwide prevalence of mental disorders in children and adolescents. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 56(3), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12381
32.
RhodesP.GilesS. J. (2014). “Risky business”: A critical analysis of the role of crisis resolution and home treatment teams. Journal of Mental Health, 23(3), 130–134. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2014.889284
33.
SnowdenL. R.MaslandM. C.WallaceN.FawleyK. (2009). Associating supplemental case management activities with ethnic minority children’s reduced use of psychiatric emergency services. Psychological Services, 6(2), 117–125. https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/epub/10.2105/AJPH.2006.105361
34.
StaiteE.HoweyL.AndersonC.MaddisonP. (2021). How well do children in the North east of England function after a crisis: A service evaluation. Mental Health Review Journal, 26(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1108/MHRJ-09-2020-0065
35.
TotmanJ.HundtG. L.WearnE.PaulM.JohnsonS. (2011). Factors affecting staff morale on inpatient mental health wards in England: A qualitative investigation. BMC Psychiatry, 11(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-68
