This paper describes the influence of the Physical, Executive, Developmental and Systems (PEDS) framework on the delivery of community-based child neuropsychological rehabilitation and how it has been enhanced by the proliferation of neuroscientific, neuropsychological and psychosocial research and evidence-base in childhood brain injury and rehabilitation over the past decade. The paper signposts to some of the key models, theories and concepts currently shaping service delivery. Application of the PEDS framework in a clinical case is described.
AitkenM. E.McCarthyM. L.SlomineB. S.DingE.DurbinD. R.JaffeK. M.PaidasC. N.SorschA. M.ChristensenJ. R.MacKenzieE. J. (2009). Family burden after traumatic brain injury in children. Pedatrics, 123(1), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-0607
2.
AndersonV. A.CatroppaC.HaritouF.MorseS. A.RosenfeldJ. V. (2007). Identifying factors to child and family outcome 30 months after traumatic brain injury in children. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 76(3), 401–408. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2003.019174.
3.
AndersonV.CatroppaC.MorseC. (2005). Functional plasticity or vulnerability following early brain injury?Pediatrics, 116(6), 1374–1382. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-1728
4.
AndersonV.NorthamE.HendyJ.WrennalJ. (2001). Developmental neuropsychology: A clinical approach. Hove &Taylor & Francis Psychology Press.
5.
AndersonV.NorthamE.WrennallJ. (2019). Developmental neuropsychology: A clinical approach. Routledge.
6.
AshtonR. (2015). Educational neuropsychology. In ReedJ.ByardK.FineH. (Eds.), Neuropsychological Rehabilitation of Childhood Brain Injury (pp. 237–253). Palgrave MacMillan.
7.
AstleD. E.BarnesJ. J.BakerK.ColcloughG. L.WoolrichM. W. (2015). Cognitive training enhances intrinsic brain connectivity in childhood. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35(1), 6277–6283. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4517-14.2015.
8.
BabikianT.MerkleyT.SavageR. C.GizaC. C.LevinH. (2015). Chronic aspects of pediatric traumatic brain injury: Review of the literature. Journal of Neurotrauma, 1(23), 1849–1860. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2015.3971.
9.
BarkhamM.Mellor-ClarkJ. (2003). Bridging evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence: Developing a rigorous and relevant knowledge for the psychological therapies. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 10(6), 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.379.
10.
BattistaC.EvansT. M.NgoonT. J.ChenT.KochalkaJ.MenonV. (2018). Mechanisms of interactive specialisation and emergence of functional brain circuits supporting cognitive development in children. npj Science of Learning, 3, 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-017-0017-2.
11.
BennettE.GoslingS.HarterC.WatsonS. (2021, April 11). The delivery of paediatric neurorehabilitation in the Covid-19 pandemic: A survey from the UK paediatric neurorehabilitation specialist interest group. The Neuropsychologist, 21–29.
12.
Blakemore (2018). Inventing ourselves: The secret life of the teenage brain. Doubleday.
13.
BragaL. W.Da Paz JuniorA. C.YlvisakerM. (2005). Direct clinician-delivered versus indirect family-supported rehabilitation of children with traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trial. Brain Injury, 19(10), 819–831. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050500110165.
14.
ByardK. (2015). A contextual systemic perspective in child neuropsychological rehabilitation. In ReedJ.ByardK.FineH. (Eds.), Neuropsychological Rehabilitation of Childhood Brain Injury (pp. 173–190). Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137388223_9.
15.
ByardK.FineH.ReedJ. (2011). Taking a developmental and systemic perspective on neuropsychological rehabilitation with children with traumatic brain injury and their families. Clinical Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 16(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104511403582.
16.
ByardKGoslingS. (2019). Reflections on outcome measurement in child neuropsychological rehabiltiation. In JimJ.ColeE. (Eds.), Psychological therapy for acquired brain injury: Innovations for children, young people and families (pp. 43–69). Routledge.
17.
CammS.PorterM.BrooksA.BoultonK.Campos VelosoG. (2020). Cognitive intervention for children with acquired brain injury: A systematic review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 31(4), 621–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2020.1722714
18.
CatroppaC.AndersonV.MorseS. A.HaritouF.RosenfeldJ. V. (2008). Outcome and predictors of functional recovery 5 years following pediatric traumatic brain injury. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 33(7), 707–718. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsn006.
19.
CooperM.LawD. (Eds.). (2018). Working with goals in psychotherapy and counselling. Oxford University Press
20.
DennisE. L.BabikianT.GizaC. C.ThompsonP. M.AsarnowR. F. (2018). Neuroimaging of the injured pediatric brain: Methods and new lessons. Neuroscientist, 24(6), 652–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858418759489.
21.
EslingerP.BiddleK.PenningtonB.PageR. (1999). Cognitive and behavioural development up to 4 years after early right frontal lobe lesion. Developmental Neuropsychology, 15(2), 157–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565649909540744.
22.
FeeneyT.YlvisakerM. (1995). Choice and routine: Antecedent behavioural interventions for adolescents with severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 10(3), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001199-199506000-00007.
23.
FeeneyT.YlvisakerM. (2006). Context-sensitive cognitive-behavioural supports for young children with TBI: A replication study. Brain Injury, 20(6), 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050600744194.
24.
GilmoreJ. H.KnickmeyerR. CGaoW. (2018). Imaging structural and functional brain development in early childhood. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 19(3), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2018.1.
25.
HellgrenL.SamuelssonK.LundqvistA.BorsboB. (2015). Computerised training of working memory for patients with acquired brain injury. Open Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 3(2), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojtr.2015.32007.
JimJ.ColeE. (2019). Psychological therapy for paediatric acquired brain injury: Innovations for children, young people and families. Routledge.
28.
JohnsonM. H. (2011). Interactive specialisation: A domain-general framework for human functional brain development?. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2010.07.003.
KurowskiB. G.Treble-BarnaA.PilipenkoV.WadeS. L.YeatesK. O.TaylorH. G.MartinL. J.JeggaA. G. (2019). Genetic influences on behavioural outcomes after childhood TBI: A novel systems biology-informed approach. Frontiers in Genetics, 10(2), 481. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00481.
31.
LaatschL.DoddJ.BrownT.CicciaA.ConnorF.DavisK., et al. (2019). Evidence-based systematic review of cognitive rehabilitation, emotional and family treatment studies for children with acquired brain injury literature: From 2006 to 2017. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 30(1), 130–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2019.1678490.
32.
LimondJ.AdlamA. L. R.CormackM. (2014). A model for paediatric neurocognitive interventions: Considering the role of development and maturation in rehabilitation planning. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2013.873083.
33.
McCauleyS. R.WildeE. A.AndersonV. A.BedellG.BeersS. R.CampbellT. F.ChapmanS. B.Ewing-CobbsL.GerringJ. P.GioiaG. A.LevinH. S.MichaudL. J.PrasadM. R.SwaineB. R.TurkstraL. S.WadeS. L.YeatesK. O.Pediatric TBI Outcomes Workgroup. (2012). Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in pediatric traumatic brain injury research. Journal of Neurotrauma, 2(4), 678–705. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2011.1838.
34.
McKinlayA.Dalrymple-AlfordJ. C.HorwoodJ. L.FergussonD. M. (2002). Long term psychosocial outcomes after mild head injury in early childhood. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 73(3), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.73.3.281.
35.
McPhersonK.M.KayesN.M.KerstenP. (2017). MEANING as a smarter approach to goals in rehabilitation. In SiegertR. J.LevackW. M. M. (Eds.), Rehabilitation Goal Setting: Theory, Practice and Evidence (pp. 105–119). CRC Press.
36.
Pearson-FuhrhopK, M.BurkeE.CramerS. C. (2012). The influence of genetic factors on brain plasticity and recovery after neural injury. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 25(6), 682–688. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0b013e32835a360a.
37.
RajS. P.WadeS. L.CassedyA.TaylorH. G.StancinT.BrownT. M.KirkwoodM. W. (2013). Parent psychological functioning and communication predict externalizing behavior problems after pediatric traumatic brain injury. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst075.
38.
ReedJ.Warner-RogersJ. (Eds.), (2008). Child neuropsychology: Concepts, theory and practice. Wiley Blackwell.
39.
ReschC.RosemaS.HurksP.de KloetA.van HeugtenC. (2018). Searching for effective components of cognitive rehabilitation for children and adolescents with acquired brain injury: A systematic review. Brain Injury, 32(6), 679–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2018.1458335.
40.
RyanN. P.BeauchampM. H.BeareR.ColemanL.DitchfieldM.KeanM.AndersonV. A. (2016). Uncovering corticostriatal correlates of cognitive fatigue in paediatric acquired brain disorder: Evidence from traumatic brain injury. Cortex, 83(October), 222-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.07.020.
41.
StarkD.PujarS.HeymanI.MurphyT. (2019). An introduction to paediatric acquired brain injury. In JimJ.ColeE. (Eds.), Psychological therapy for acquired brain injury: Innovations for children, young people and families (pp. 27–42). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429296932-3.
42.
TateR. (2019). Measuring outcomes and monitoring progress in the era of evidence-based clinical practice. Brain Impairment, 20(3), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1017/Brimp.2019.28.
43.
TaylorH. G.YeatesK. O.WadeS.DrotarD.StancinT.BurantC. (2001). Bidirectional child-family influences on outcomes of traumatic brain injury in children. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7(6), 755-767. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617701766118.
44.
TuckerP. (2015). Goal setting and goal attainment scaling in child neuropsychological rehabilitation. In ReedJ.ByardK.FineH. (Eds.), Neuropsychological Rehabilitation of Childhood Brain Injury (pp. 151–170). Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137388223_8.
WadeS. L.BorowskiE. A.TaylorH. G.DrotarD.YeatesK. O.StancinT. (2011a). The relationship of caregiver coping to family outcomes during the initial year following pediatric traumatic brain injury. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(3), 406–415. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.69.3.406.
48.
WadeS. L.CassedyA.WalzN. C.TaylorH. G.StancinT.YeatesK. O. (2011b). The relationships of parental warm responsiveness and negativity to emerging behaviour problems following traumatic brain injury in your children. Developmental Psychology, 47(1), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021028.
49.
WadeS. L.HungA. (2015). Online family problem-solving for adolescent traumatic brain injury. In ReedJ.ByardK.FineH. (Eds.), Neuropsychological Rehabilitation of Childhood Brain Injury (pp. 43–59). Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137388223_3.
50.
WadeS. L.OberjohnK.BurkhardtA.GreenbergI. (2009). Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a web-based parenting program for young children with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 24(4), 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0b013e3181ad6680.
51.
WadeS. L.WolfeC.Maines BrownT.PestianJ. P. (2005). Putting the pieces together: Preliminary efficacy of a web-based family intervention for children with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Paediatric Psychology, 30(5), 437–442. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsi067.
52.
WatsonS.GraceyG. (2019). Assessment in paediatric acquired brain injury. In JimJ.ColeE. (Eds.), Psychological therapy for acquired brain injury: Innovations for children, young people and families (pp. 43–69). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429296932-4.
53.
WatsonS.ReedJ.ByardK. (2015). Helping children with brain injury and behavioural problems: the importance of antecedent regulation. In ReedJ.ByardK.FineH. (Eds.), Neuropsychological Rehabilitation of Childhood Brain Injury (pp. 106–127). Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137388223_6.
54.
World Health Organization (2001). International Classification of functioning, disability and health. World Health Organization.
55.
YeatesK. O.TaylorH. G.DrotarD.WadeS. L.KleinS.StancinT.SchatschneiderC. (1997). Pre-injury family environment as a determinant of recovery from traumatic brain injuries in school-age children. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 3(6), 617–630. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617797006176.
56.
YeatesK. O.TaylorH. G.WalzN. C.StancinT.WadeS. L. (2010). The family environment as a moderator of psychosocial outcomes following traumatic brain injury in young children. Neuropsychology, 24(3), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018387.
YlvisakerM.AdelsonD. P.BragaL. W.BurnettM. S.GlangA.FeeneyT.TodisB. (2005). Rehabilitation and ongoing support after paediatric TBI: Twenty years of progress. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 20(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001199-200501000-00009.
YlvisakerM.TurkstraL.CoehloC.YorkstonK.KennedyM.SohlbergM.AveryJ. (2007). Behavioural interventions for children and adults with behaviour disorders after TBI: A systematic review of the evidence. Brain Injury, 21(8), 769–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050701482470.