Millions of children are exposed to domestic violence. How children negotiate and make sense of living with domestic violence is still under-researched. This study sought to capture the dual-perspectives of school-aged children and their mothers, to develop a richer understanding of children’s experiences of domestic violence, using a community-based sample. A qualitative research design was employed, with interpretative phenomenological analysis used to interpret the data. Five school-aged children and three of their mothers participated in the study. Two master themes are discussed from the analysis of the children’s perspective: domestic violence through the eyes of children; and learning from children’s experiences. Two master themes are discussed from the analysis of the mothers’ perspective: reflecting on the child in the context of domestic violence; and learning from mothers: insights, support and services. The crucial importance of the mother-child relationship in shaping children’s experience of domestic violence was illustrated in both the perspectives; a finding which may have important implications for the development of interventions. It was also evident that children as young as eight were able to powerfully articulate their experiences of domestic violence.
AinsworthM. D. SBowlbyJ. (1991). An ethological approach to personality development. American Psychologist, 46, 331–341.
2.
BionW. (1962). A theory of thinking. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 43, 306–310.
3.
BowlbyJ. (1988). A secure base: Clinical applications of attachment theory. London, UK: Routledge.
4.
BrewinC. R.DalgleishTJosephS. (1996). A dual representation theory of post traumatic stress disorder. Psychological Review, 103, 670–686.
5.
British Medical Association [BMA]. (2007). Domestic abuse: A report from the BMA board of science. London, UK: BMA.
6.
BuckleyH.HoltS.WhelanS. (2007). Listen to me! Children’s experiences of domestic violence. Child Abuse Review, 16, 296–310.
7.
BurnsR. C.KaufmanS. H. (1972). Action, styles and symbols in kinetic family drawings: An interpretive manual. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
8.
CalhounL. G.TedeschiR. G. (2006). The foundations of posttraumatic growth: An expanded framework. In CalhounL. G.TedeschiR. G. (Eds) Handbook of posttraumatic growth: Research and practice (pp. 1–23). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
9.
CarlsonB. E. (2000). Children exposed to intimate partner violence: Research, findings and implications for intervention. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 1, 321–342.
10.
CunninghamA.BakerL. (2004). What about me! Seeking to understand a child’s view of violence in the family. London: Centre for Children and Families in the Justice System.
11.
Department of Health. (2004). National service framework for children, young people and maternity services. London, UK: HMSO.
12.
EdlesonJ. L. (1999). Children’s witnessing of adult domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 839–870.
13.
EdlesonJ. L. (2001). Studying the co-occurrence of child maltreatment and domestic violence in families. In Graham-BermannS.A.EdlesonJ. L. (Eds.) Domestic violence in the lives of children: The future of research, intervention, and social policy (pp. 91–110). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
14.
EiserC.TwamleyS. (1999). Talking to children about health and illness. In MurrayM.ChamberlainK. (Eds.) Qualitative health psychology theories and methods (pp. 133–147). London: Sage.
15.
EnglishD. J.EdlesonJ. L.HerrickM. E. (2005). Domestic violence in one state’s child protective caseload: A study of differential case dispositions and outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 1183–1201.
16.
FonagyP. (1991). Thinking about thinking: Some clinical and theoretical considerations in the treatment of the borderline patient. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 72, 118–127.
17.
GoldblattH. (2003). Strategies of coping among adolescents experiencing interparental violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 532–552.
18.
GoldenC. (2007). Mothers’ parenting stress and its relationship to help seeking behaviour. Dissertation Abstract International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 67, 6054.
19.
HolmesJ. (1993). John Bowlby and attachment theory. Hove, UK: Brunner-Routledge.
20.
HoltS.BuckleyH.WhelanS. (2008). The impact of exposure to domestic violence on children and young people: A review of the literature. Child Abuse and Neglect, 32, 797–810.
21.
HumphreysC.HoughtonC.EllisJ. (2008). Literature review. Better outcomes for children and young people experiencing domestic abuse: Directions for good practice. Edinburgh, UK: The Scottish Government.
22.
HumphreysC.MullenderA.ThiaraR. K.SkamballisA. (2006). 'Talking to my mum': Developing communication between women and children in the aftermath of domestic violence. Journal of Social Work, 6, 53–65.
23.
HumphreysC.ThiaraR. K.SkamballisA. (2011). Readiness to change: Mother-child relationship and domestic violence intervention. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 166–184.
KerigP. K. (1998). Gender and appraisals as mediators of adjustment in children exposed to inter-parental violence. Journal of Family Violence, 13, 345–363.
26.
LapierreS. (2007). More responsibilities, less control: Understanding the challenges and difficulties involved in mothering in the context of domestic violence. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1434–1451.
27.
LapierreS. (2008). Mothering in the context of domestic violence: The pervasiveness of a deficit model of mothering. Child & Family Social Work, 13, 454–463.
28.
LemmaA. (2003). Introduction to the practice of psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Chichester: Wiley.
29.
MalchiodiC. A. (2001). Using drawing as intervention with traumatized children. Trauma & Loss: Research Interventions, 1, 21–28.
30.
McIntoshJ. E. (2002). Thought in the face of violence: A child’s need. Child Abuse and Neglect: The International Journal, 26, 229–241.
31.
MorrisonF. (2009). After domestic abuse: Children’s perspectives on contact with father’s. Edinburgh, UK: Centre for Research on Families and Relationships.
SmithJ. A.OsbornM. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In SmithJ. A. (Ed.) Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to methods (2nd edn, pp. 53–81). London, UK: Sage.
40.
SternbergK. J.LambM. E.GutermanE.AbbottC. B. (2006). Effects of early and later family violence on children’s behavior problems and depression: A longitudinal, multi-informant perspective. Child Abuse and Neglect: The International Journal, 30, 283–306.
41.
Streeck-FischerA.Van der KolkB. A. (2000). Down will come baby, cradle and all: Diagnostic and therapeutic implications of chronic trauma on child development. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 34, 903–918.
42.
TouroniE.CoyleA. (2002). Decision making in planned lesbian parenting. An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 194–209.
43.
Van der KolkB. A.McFarlaneA. C.WeisaethL. (Eds.) (1996). Traumatic stress: The effects of overwhelming experience on mind, body, and society. New York: Guilford.
44.
WatsonD.ParsonsS. (2005). Domestic abuse of women and men in Ireland: Report on the national study of domestic abuse. Dublin, Ireland: National Crime Council.
45.
YardleyL. (2008). Demonstrating validity in qualitative psychology. In SmithJ. A. (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to methods (2nd edn, pp. 235–252). London, UK: Sage.
