Tiny moments of great importance: The Marte Meo method applied in the context of early mother–infant interaction and postnatal depression. Utilizing Daniel Stern’s theory of ‘schemas of being with’ in understanding empirical findings and developing a stringent Marte Meo methodology
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2014
Tiny moments of great importance: The Marte Meo method applied in the context of early mother–infant interaction and postnatal depression. Utilizing Daniel Stern’s theory of ‘schemas of being with’ in understanding empirical findings and developing a stringent Marte Meo methodology
This paper provides an overview of basic Marte Meo video interaction guidance concepts and describes the therapeutic performance of the method applied in the context of early mother–infant interaction and postnatal depression. Weight is put upon the importance of the therapeutic relationship. Further Marte Meo therapy is understood in the light of Daniel Stern’s theory of ‘schemas of being with’ and accompanied by clinical vignettes from therapy sessions. The empirical basis for the paper is a study of postnatal depression, mother–infant interaction and video guidance, carried out in Southern Norway. The study examined Marte Meo from a phenomenological perspective. Marte Meo was offered to mothers with either postnatal depression or depressive symptoms. In in-depth interviews the participants reported that the Marte Meo method, ‘from the outside looking in’, increased their reflections about their infants and their own mental states as well as their sensitive interaction with their newborn. Their mothering was improved and they reported feeling less depressed. We argue that Marte Meo methodology can guide new mothers with depressive symptoms, and contribute to the creation of new schemas of being together.
AxbergU.HanssonK.BrobergA. G.WirtbergI. (2006). The development of a systemic school-based intervention: Marte Meo and coordination meetings. Family Process, 45, 375–389.
4.
BeebeB. (2003). Brief mother–infant treatment: Psychoanalytically informed video feedback. Infant Mental Health Journal, 24, 24–52.
5.
BrooksJ. (2008). Video Interaction Guidance: A practitioner’s perspective. Community Practitioner, 81, 21–24.
6.
FonagyP.GergelyG.JuristE. L.TargetM. (2002). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self. New York, USA: Other Press.
7.
FonagyP.SteeleM.SteeleH.HiggittA. (1994). The Emanuel Miller Memorial Lecture 1992: The theory and practice of resilience. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 231–257.
8.
FraibergS.AdelsonE.ShapiroV. (2003). Ghosts in the nursery: A psychoanalytic approach to the problems of impaired infant-mother relationships. In Raphael-LeffJ. (Ed.), Parent–infant psychodynamics: Wild things, mirrors and ghosts (pp. 87–117). Philadelphia, USA: Whurr Publishers.
9.
HedenbroM.WirtbergI. (2002). Samspillets kraft: Marte Meo – mulighet til utvikling (The strength of interaction: Marte Meo – possibilities for development). Oslo, Norway: Kommuneforlaget.
10.
HubbleM. A.DuncanB. L.MillerS. D. (1999). The heart and soul of change: What works in therapy. Washington, DC, USA: American Psychological Association.
11.
HyndS.KhanS.TilleyS.ChambersM. (2004). Identity and the experience of postnatal depression: The use of Video Interaction Guidance. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 11, 738–741.
12.
JufferF.Bakermans-KranenburgM. J.van IjzendoornM. H. (2008). Methods of the video-feedback programs to promote positive parenting alone, with sensitive discipline, and with representational attachment discussions. In JufferF.Bakermans-KranenburgM. J.van IJzendoornM. H. (Eds), Promoting positive parenting. An attachment-based intervention (pp. 11–21). New York: Psychology Press.
13.
JuristE. L. (2005). Mentalized affectivity. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 22, 426–444.
14.
JuristE. L . (2008). Minds and yours: New directions for mentalization theory. In ElliottL.JuristE. L.SladeA.BergnerS. (Eds), Mind to mind: Infant research, neuroscience and psychoanalysis (pp. 88–114). New York, USA: Other Press.
15.
KennedyH.LandorM.ToddL. (2010). Video Interaction Guidance as a method to promote secure attachment. Educational and Child Psychology, 27(3), 59–72.
16.
LambertM. J. (1992). Implications of outcome research for psychotherapy integration. In NorcrossJ. C.GoldfriedM. R. (Eds), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (pp. 92–129). New York, USA: Basic Books.
17.
McDonoughS. C. (1995). Promoting positive early parent-infant relationships through interaction guidance. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 4, 661–672.
18.
McDonoughS. C. (2000). Interaction guidance: An approach for difficult-to-engage families. In ZeanahC. H. (Ed.), Handbook of Infant Mental Health (pp. 485–493) (2nd ed.). New York, USA: The Guilford Press.
MurrayL. (1998). Contributions of experimental and clinical perturbations of mother–infant communication to the understanding of infant intersubjectivity. In BratenS. (Ed.), Intersubjective communication and emotion in early ontogeny (pp. 127–143). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
OstermanG.MollerA.WirtbergI. (2010). The Marte Meo method as a means of supporting new adoptive parents. Adoption & Fostering, 34(2), 49–57.
22.
SchibbyeA. (1996). Anerkjennelse: En terapeutisk intervensjon? (Recognition: A therapeutic intervention?). Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening, 33, 530–537.
23.
SladeA.SadlerL.De Dios-KennC.WebbD.Currier-EzepchickJ.MayesL. (2005). Minding the baby – a reflective parenting program. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 60, 74–100.
24.
SluckinA. (1998). Bonding failure: ‘I don’t know this baby, she’s nothing to do with me.’Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 3, 11–24.
25.
SokolowskiR. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
SternD. N. (1990). Diary of a baby. New York, USA: Basic Books.
27.
SternD. N. (1998). The motherhood constellation: A unified view of parent–infant psychotherapy. London, UK: Karnac Books.
28.
SternD. N. (2000). The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. New York, USA: Basic Books.
29.
SternD. N. (2004). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. New York, USA; London, UK: Norton.
30.
Van den BerghP. M.KlompM.HarinckF. J. H. (1997). Video interaction guidance in residential treatment. Child and Youth Care Forum, 26, 357–368.
31.
Van DoesumK. T. M.HosmanC. M. H.Riksen-WalravenJ. M. (2005). A model-based intervention for depressed mothers and their infants. Infant Mental Health Journal, 26(2), 157–176.
32.
VikK. (2010). ‘From the outside looking in’: A phenomenological study of postnatal depression, mother–infant interaction and video guidance. PhD Doctoral thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway: Unipub.
33.
VikK.BratenS. (2009). Video interaction guidance inviting transcendence of postpartum depressed mothers’ self-centered state and holding behavior. Infant Mental Health Journal, 30(3), 287–300.
34.
VikK.HaftingM. (2006). Video interaction guidance offered to mothers with postnatal depression: Experiences from a pilot study. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 60(3), 234–238.
35.
VikK.HaftingM. (2009). The outside view as facilitator of self-reflection and vitality: A phenomenological approach. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 27(3), 287–298.
36.
VikK.RohdeR. (2002). Kan samspillsorientert, barnefokusert filmveiledning være til hjelp for deprimerte småbarnsmødre? (Can interaction-oriented, child-focused video interaction guidance help depressed mothers with pre-school children?). Kristiansand, Norway: Kristiansand kommune.
