Navigating the healthcare system is complex. Care fragmentation is a major issue. Patient navigators have emerged to improve care continuity, especially for vulnerable individuals. With digital health expansion, digital navigator (DN) roles have been created to foster digital literacy, access and equity.
Objectives
To identify DN's roles in reducing health inequities and examine its terminology, professional background, training, techniques, skills, communication methods and outcomes.
Methodology
Systematic review across five databases. Data extraction included DN characteristics and outcomes. Thematic analysis compared expectations and findings.
Results
Sixteen studies were reviewed. Findings suggest that the DN may help reducing inequities in healthcare access, though it is not guaranteed. Gaps were found in DN roles, competencies, training and terminology. Most studies emphasised technical support, communication and clinical integration, with limited focus on social issues. Disparities were noted between expected and reported roles.
Conclusion
The DN role shows promise, especially in fragmented systems, but remains underexplored. Current approaches emphasise technology over social support. Broader understanding and implementation are needed.
FreemanHP. The history, principles, and future of patient navigation: commentary. Semin Oncol Nurs2013; 29: 72–75.
2.
CarterNValaitisRKLamA, et al.Navigation delivery models and roles of navigators in primary care: a scoping literature review. BMC Health Serv Res2018; 18: 1–13. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-018-2889-0.
3.
FerranteJMCohenDJCrossonJC. Translating the patient navigator approach to meet the needs of primary care. J Am Board Fam Med2010; 23: 736–744.
4.
KokoreliasKMShiers-HanleyJERiosJ, et al.Factors influencing the implementation of patient navigation programs for adults with complex needs: a scoping review of the literature. Health Serv Insights2021; 14: 1–17. DOI: 10.1177/11786329211033267.
5.
DaltonMHolzmanEErwinE, et al.Patient navigation services for cancer care in low-and middle-income countries: a scoping review. PLoS One2019; 14: 1–14. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223537.
6.
FreireMPLouvisonMFeuerwerkerLCM, et al.Regulação do cuidado em redes de atenção: importância de novos arranjos tecnológicos. Saude soc2020; 29: 1–9. DOI: 10.1590/s0104-12902020190682.
7.
AbdiITinessiaAMahimboA, et al.Is it time to retire the label “CALD” in public health research and practice?Med J Aust2025; 222: 220–222.
8.
BadrJMotulskyADenisJL. Digital health technologies and inequalities: a scoping review of potential impacts and policy recommendations. Health Policy2024; 146: 1–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105122.
9.
HoffmanLBenedettoEHuangH, et al.Augmenting mental health in primary care: a 1-year study of deploying smartphone apps in a multi-site primary care/behavioral health integration program. Front Psychiatry2019; 10. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00094.
10.
Catapan S deCSazonHZhengS, et al.A systematic review of consumers’ and healthcare professionals’ trust in digital healthcare. NPJ Digit Med2025; 8: 1–9.
11.
FergusonT. From patients to end users. Br Med J2002; 324: 555–556.
12.
Rodriguez-VillaENaslundJKeshavanM, et al.Making mental health more accessible in light of COVID-19: scalable digital health with digital navigators in low and middle-income countries. Asian J Psychiatr2020; 54: 1–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102433.
13.
Rodriguez-VillaERauseo-RicuperoNCamachoE, et al.The digital clinic: Implementing technology and augmenting care for mental health. Gen Hosp Psychiatry2020; 66: 59–66.
14.
WisniewskiHGorrindoTRauseo-RicuperoN, et al.The role of digital navigators in promoting clinical care and technology integration into practice. Digit Biomark2020; 4: 119–135.
15.
WisniewskiHTorousJ. Digital navigators to implement smartphone and digital tools in care. Acta Psychiatr Scand2020; 141: 350–355.
16.
RodriguezJACharlesJPBatesDW, et al.Digital healthcare equity in primary care: implementing an integrated digital health navigator. JAMIA Open2023; 30: 965–970.
17.
Offodile IIACSeitzAJPetersonSK. Digital health navigation: an enabling infrastructure for optimizing and integrating virtual care into oncology practice. JCO Clin Cancer Inform2021; 5: 1151–1154.
18.
ZhengYWalshamG. Inequality of what? An intersectional approach to digital inequality under COVID-19. Inf Organ2021; 31: 1–6.
19.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J2021; 372(71): 1–9. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
20.
PorrittK., EvansC. BennettC., et al.Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence (2024). Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Porritt K, Pilla B, Jordan Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, 2024.
21.
ThomasJHardenA. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol2008; 8: 1–10. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.
22.
GoodmanDOgrincGDaviesL, et al.Explanation and elaboration of the SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) Guidelines, V.2.0: examples of SQUIRE elements in the healthcare improvement literature. BMJ Qual Saf2016; 25: 1–24. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004480.
23.
AlonNPerretSCohenA, et al.Navigator training to increase access to mental health care in community-based organizations. Psychiatr Serv. 2024; 75: 608–611.
24.
MacrynikolaNNguyenNLaneE, et al.The Digital Clinic: an innovative mental health care delivery model utilizing hybrid synchronous and asynchronous treatment. NEJM Catal2023; 4: 1–15. DOI: 10.1056/CAT.23.0100.
25.
BondarJBabich MorrowCGueorguievaR, et al.Clinical and financial outcomes associated with a workplace mental health program before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open2022; 5: 1–13. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16349.
26.
CamachoEChangSMCurreyD, et al.The impact of guided versus supportive coaching on mental health app engagement and clinical outcomes. Health Informatics J2023; 29: 1–12. DOI: 10.1177/14604582231215872.
27.
GreenJBRodriguezJKeshavanM, et al.Implementing technologies to enhance coordinated specialty care framework: implementation outcomes from a development and usability study. JMIR Form Res2023; 7: 1–14. DOI: 10.2196/46491.
28.
ChenKLaneEBurnsJ, et al.The Digital Navigator: standardizing human technology support in app-integrated clinical care. Telemed J E Health2024; 30: e1963–e1970. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2024.0023.
29.
Hernandez-RamosRAguileraAGarciaF, et al.Conducting internet-based visits for onboarding populations with limited digital literacy to an mhealth intervention: development of a patient-centered approach. JMIR Form Res2021; 5: 1–9. DOI: 10.2196/25299.
30.
MohrDCSchuellerSMTomasinoKN, et al.Comparison of the effects of coaching and receipt of APP recommendations on depression, anxiety, and engagement in the IntelliCare platform: factorial randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res2019; 21: 1–12. DOI: 10.2196/13609.
31.
ArayasirikulSTurnerCMTrujilloD, et al. . The dose response effects of digital HIV care navigation on mental health and viral suppression among young people living with HIV: single-arm, prospective study with a pre-post design. J Med Internet Res2022; 24: 1–10. DOI: 10.2196/33990.
32.
TrujilloDTurnerCLeV, et al.Digital HIV care navigation for young people living with HIV in San Francisco, California: feasibility and acceptability study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth2020; 8: 1–9. DOI: 10.2196/16838.
33.
ZulkiewiczBABurrusOHarshbargerC, et al.Identifying implementation strategies that address barriers and facilitate implementation of digital interventions in HIV primary care settings: results from the pilot implementation of positive health check. AIDS Behav2021; 25: 154–166.
34.
ChuJNKaplanCLeeJS, et al.Increasing telehealth access to care for older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic at an academic medical center: video visits for elders project (VVEP). Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf2022; 48: 173–179.
35.
MechanicOJLeeEMSheehanHM, et al.Evaluation of telehealth visit attendance after implementation of a Patient Navigator Program. JAMA Netw Open2022; 5: 1–7. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.45615.
36.
CasperGRBrennanPFBurkeLJ, et al.HeartCareII: patients’ use of a home care web resource. Stud Health Technol Inform2009; 146: 139–143.
37.
BenderJLFloraPKSoheilipourS, et al.Web-based peer navigation for men with prostate cancer and their family caregivers: a pilot feasibility study. CurrOncol2022; 29: 4285–4299.
38.
MichieSRichardsonMJohnstonM, et al.The Behavior Change Technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med2013; 46: 81–95.
39.
FernandezMESavasLSLipizziE, et al.Cervical cancer control for Hispanic women in Texas: strategies from research and practice. Gynecol Oncol2014; 132: 26–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.038.
40.
BernsteinEEWeingardenHWolfeEC, et al.Human support in app-based cognitive behavioral therapies for emotional disorders: scoping review. J Med Internet Res2022; 24: 1–22. DOI: 10.2196/33307.
41.
NoelVACarpenter-SongEAcquilanoSC, et al.The technology specialist: a 21st century support role in clinical care. NPJ Digit Med2019; 2: 1–3. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0137-6.
42.
MeyerAWisniewskiHTorousJ. Coaching to support mental health apps: exploratory narrative review. JMIR Hum Factors2022; 9: 1–8. DOI: 10.2196/28301.
43.
PerretSAlonNCarpenter-SongE, et al.Standardising the role of a digital navigator in behavioural health: a systematic review. Lancet Digit Health2023; 5: e925–e932. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00152-8.
44.
Gallegos-RejasVMDe GuzmanKRKellyJT, et al.Strategies to improve telehealth access for culturally and linguistically diverse communities: a systematic review. J Public Health2025; 47: e374–e390. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaf030.
45.
KallmyerBABassDBaumgartM, et al.Dementia care navigation: building toward a common definition, key principles, and outcomes. Alzheimers Dement (N Y)2023; 9: 1–12. DOI: 10.1002/trc2.12408.
46.
RodriguezALCappellettiLKurianSM, et al.Transitional care navigation. Semin Oncol Nurs2024; 40: 151580. DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151580.
47.
TruongMParadiesYPriestN. Interventions to improve cultural competency in healthcare: a systematic review of reviews. BMC Health Serv Res2014; 14: 99.
48.
BrachCFraserI. Reducing disparities through culturally competent health care: an analysis of the business case. Qual Manag Health Care2002; 10: 15–28.
49.
EmersonMRDinkelDWatanabe-GallowayS, et al.Adaptation of digital navigation training for integrated behavioral health providers: interview and survey study. Transl Behav Med.2023;13:612–623.
50.
KernLMBynumJPWPincusHA. Care fragmentation, care continuity, and care coordination—how they differ and why it matters. JAMA Intern Med2024; 184: 36.
51.
FordJSowdenSOliveraJ, et al.Transforming health systems to reduce health inequalities. Future Healthc J2021; 8: e204–e209. DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2021-0018.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
