Telehealth may offer a valuable resource for family caregivers’ physical and psychological well-being; however, understanding its effectiveness is crucial to determining its true potential. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to examine the effectiveness of telehealth interventions focused on family caregivers’ physical and psychological well-being, along with other factors during the care of older adults with various diseases (such as neurocognitive disorders, chronic conditions, and musculoskeletal diseases).
Methods
PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Studies that investigated the effects of telehealth on family caregivers of older adults with any disease and a comparison group receiving any type of intervention were selected. Two independent reviewers carried out the study selection and data extraction. We conducted a meta-analysis using standardized mean differences (SMDs) to pool the continuous outcomes included. Heterogeneity (I² and Tau²), publication bias (Egger's test and funnel plots), risk of bias (Joanna Briggs Institute tool), potential mediators (meta-regressions), and robustness (leave-one-out method) were also assessed.
Results
Twenty-six studies were selected (23 randomized controlled trial and 3 quasi-experimental studies), including a total of 2932 family caregivers. Telehealth was more effective than usual care in improving psychological well-being (SMD = 0.21; p = 0.006), caregiving competence (SMD, 0.73; p = 0.007), and reducing caregiver burden (SMD = −0.26; p = 0.01) in a follow-up shorter than 4 months. It was not effective in reducing anxiety or depression (SMD = −0.18 and −0.40; p = 0.08 and 0.20, respectively), nor in improving physical fitness (SMD = −0.16; p = 0.460). Considering a follow-up period of 4–12 months, the only outcome in favor of telehealth was the improvement in managing patients’ problematic behaviors (SMD = −1.27; p < 0.0001). It was not effective for psychological well-being, anxiety, depression, or caregiver burden (SMD = 0.15, 0.22, 0.08, and −0.33; p = 0.290, 0.260, 0.550, and 0.550, respectively).
Conclusion
Telehealth may be a valuable option for supporting family caregivers of older adults in improving psychological well-being, caregiving competence, and reducing burden, but the benefits may not last long term.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social affairs. Leaving no one behind in an ageing World. World Social Report 2023. New York: United Nations publication, 2023.
2.
ChangWYChenKMChenMC, et al.Prevalence and demographic characteristics of high-need community-dwelling older adults in Taiwan. Health Soc Care Community2020; 28: 2382–2389.
3.
SanfordAMMorleyJEBerg-WegerM, et al.High prevalence of geriatric syndromes in older adults. PLoS One2020; 15: e0233857.
4.
VeiziBGYTaşcıİNaharciMI. Geriatric syndromes in the population older than 90 years: The prevalence and association with chronic diseases. Australas J Ageing2023; 42: 472–479.
5.
Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion (European Commission). Study on exploring the incidence and costs of informal long-term care in the EU. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union, June 2021.
6.
TuraleSThanaK. Global challenges in caregiving for older adults: Solutions and call to action. J Gerontol Nurs2023; 49: 3–6.
7.
GroverSNehraRMalhotraR, et al.Positive aspects of caregiving experience among caregivers of patients with dementia. East Asian Arch Psychiatry2017; 27: 71–78.
8.
KrishnanSTony ChenHCastonS, et al.Physical and psychological burden among caregivers of Latinx older adults with stroke and multimorbidity. Ethn Dis2023; 33: 156–162.
9.
FigueiredoLCBarbosaGCMonteiroDQ, et al.Factors associated with symptoms of physical and emotional burden in informal caregivers of the elderly. Rev Bras Enferm2022; 75: e20210927.
10.
ChanCYDe RozaJGDingGTY, et al.Psychosocial factors and caregiver burden among primary family caregivers of frail older adults with multimorbidity. BMC Prim Care2023; 24: 36.
11.
GérainPZechE. Do informal caregivers experience more burnout? A meta-analytic study. Psychol Health Med2021; 26: 145–161.
12.
Akgun-CitakEAttepe-OzdenSVaskelyteA, et al.Challenges and needs of informal caregivers in elderly care: Qualitative research in four European countries, the TRACE project. Arch Gerontol Geriatr2020; 87: 103971.
13.
FelipeSGBOliveiraCdSSilvaCRDT, et al.Anxiety and depression in informal caregivers of dependent elderly people: An analytical study. Rev Bras Enferm2020; 73: e20190851.
14.
RyffCD. Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in science and practice. Psychother Psychosom2013; 83: 10.
15.
Fernández-LópezJAFernández-FidalgoMCiezaA. Quality of life, health and well-being conceptualizations from the perspective of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Rev Esp Salud Publica2010; 84: 169–184.
16.
AkçobanSEskimezZ. Homecare patients’ quality of life and the burden of family caregivers: A descriptive cross-sectional study. Home Health Care Serv Q2023; 42: 216–229.
17.
NorthouseLLKatapodiMCSchafenackerAM, et al.The impact of caregiving on the psychological well-being of family caregivers and cancer patients. Semin Oncol Nurs2012; 28: 236–245.
18.
HwangYKimJ. Influence of caregivers’ psychological well-being on the anxiety and depression of care recipients with dementia. Geriatr Nurs2024; 55: 44–51.
19.
MårtenssonECoumoundourosCSörensdotterR, et al.Psychological interventions for symptoms of depression among informal caregivers of older adult populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Affect Disord2023; 320: 474–498.
20.
DhumalTSiddiquiZAKelleyGA, et al.Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of interventions addressing caregiver distress and burden among cancer caregivers. PEC Innov2023; 2: 100145.
21.
Ariza-VegaPOrtiz-PiñaMMora-TraversoM, et al.Development and evaluation of a post-hip fracture instructional workshop for caregivers. J Geriatr Phys Ther2020; 43: 128–134.
22.
BrunetHEBanksSJLiberaA, et al.Training in improvisation techniques helps reduce caregiver burden and depression: Innovative practice. Dementia (London)2021; 20: 364–372.
23.
RuggianoNBrownELLiJ, et al.Rural dementia caregivers and technology: What is the evidence?Res Gerontol Nurs2018; 11: 216–224.
24.
IpsenJAVibergBPedersenLT, et al.Informal care after hip fracture: Prospective cohort. BMC Geriatr2024; 24: 436.
25.
RoyJLevyDRSenathirajahY. Defining telehealth for research, implementation, and equity. J Med Internet Res2022; 24: e35037.
26.
Sala-GonzálezMPérez-JoverVGuilabertM, et al.Mobile apps for helping informal caregivers: A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18: 1–17.
27.
LengMZhaoYXiaoH, et al.Internet-based supportive interventions for family caregivers of people with dementia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res2020; 22: e19468.
28.
González-FraileEBallesterosJRuedaJR, et al.Remotely delivered information, training and support for informal caregivers of people with dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2021; 1: CD006440.
29.
ZhaiSChuFTanM, et al.Digital health interventions to support family caregivers: An updated systematic review. Digit Health2023; 9: 20552076231171967.
30.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J2021; 372: n71.
31.
DeeksJJHigginsJPTAltmanDG. Chapter 10: Analysing data and undertaking meta-analysis. Section: 10.5.2. Meta-analysis of change scores. In: HigginsJPTThomasJChandlerJ, et al. (eds) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.4. London: Cochrane, 2024, pp.1–48. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
32.
HigginsJPTThompsonSGSpiegelhalterDJ. A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc2009; 172: 137–159.
33.
ViechtbauerW. Model checking in meta-analysis. In: ScmidCHStijnenTWhiteI (eds) Handbook of Meta-Analysis. 1st ed. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2020, pp.219–254.
34.
Marks-AnglinADuanRChenY, et al.Publication and outcome reporting bias. In: ScmidCHStijnenTWhiteI (eds) Handbook of Meta-Analysis. 1st ed. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2020, pp.283–312.
35.
PustejovskyJERodgersMA. Testing for funnel plot asymmetry of standardized mean differences. Res Synth Methods2019; 10: 57–71.
36.
HigginsJPTLópez-LópezJAAloeAM. Meta-Regression. In: ScmidCHStijnenTWhiteI (eds) Handbook of Meta-Analysis. 1st ed. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2020, pp.129–149.
37.
ViechtbauerWCheungMWL. Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods2010; 1: 112–125.
38.
BalduzziSRückerGSchwarzerG. How to perform a meta-analysis with R: A practical tutorial. Evid Based Ment Health2019; 22: 153–160.
39.
BlomMMZaritSHGroot ZwaaftinkRBM, et al.Effectiveness of an internet intervention for family caregivers of people with dementia: Results of a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One2015; 10: e0116622.
40.
BootsLMMDe VugtMEKempenGIJM, et al.Effectiveness of a blended care self-management program for caregivers of people with early-stage dementia (partner in balance): Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res2018; 20: e10017.
41.
Keeping-BurkeLPurdenMFrasure-SmithN, et al.Bridging the transition from hospital to home: Effects of the VITAL telehealth program on recovery for CABG surgery patients and their caregivers. Res Nurs Health2013; 36: 540–553.
42.
Dionne-OdomJNEjemDBWellsR, et al.Effects of a telehealth early palliative care intervention for family caregivers of persons with advanced heart failure the ENABLE CHF-PC randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open2020; 3: e202583.
43.
DugglebyWPloegJMcAineyC, et al.Web-based intervention for family carers of persons with dementia and multiple chronic conditions (My Tools 4 Care): Pragmatic randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res2018; 20: e10484.
44.
ElliottTRBrossartDBerryJW, et al.Problem-solving training via videoconferencing for family caregivers of persons with spinal cord injuries: A randomized controlled trial. Behav Res Ther2008; 46: 1220–1229.
45.
GhaniZSahaSJarlJ, et al.Short term economic evaluation of the digital platform ‘support, monitoring and reminder technology for mild dementia’ (SMART4MD) for people with mild cognitive impairment and their informal caregivers. J Alzheimers Dis2022; 86: 1629–1641.
46.
HattinkBMeilandFVan Der RoestH, et al.Web-based STAR E-learning course increases empathy and understanding in dementia caregivers: Results from a randomized controlled trial in The Netherlands and the United Kingdom. J Med Internet Res2015; 17: e241.
47.
LaverKLiuEClemsonL, et al.Does telehealth delivery of a dyadic dementia care program provide a noninferior alternative to face-to-face delivery of the same program? A randomized, controlled trial. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry2020; 28: 673–682.
48.
MeichsnerFTheurerCWilzG. Acceptance and treatment effects of an internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral intervention for family caregivers of people with dementia: A randomized-controlled trial. J Clin Psychol2019; 75: 594–613.
49.
MoskowitzJTCheungEOSnowbergKE, et al.Randomized controlled trial of a facilitated online positive emotion regulation intervention for dementia caregivers. Health Psychol2019; 38: 391–402.
50.
NealDPEttemaTPZwanMD, et al.Findmyapps compared with usual tablet use to promote social health of community-dwelling people with mild dementia and their informal caregivers: A randomised controlled trial. EClinicalMedicine2023; 63: 102169.
51.
PietteJDStriplinDMarinecN, et al.A randomized trial of mobile health support for heart failure patients and their informal caregivers impacts on caregiver-reported outcomes. Med Care2015; 53: 692–699.
52.
De LucaRTorrisiMBramantiA, et al.A multidisciplinary telehealth approach for community dwelling older adults. Geriatr Nurs (Minneap)2021; 42: 635–642.
53.
RhodusEKBaumCKryscioR, et al.Feasibility of telehealth occupational therapy for behavioral symptoms of adults with dementia: Randomized controlled trial. Am J Occup Ther2023; 77: 7704205010.
54.
Sarabia-CoboCPérezVde LorenaP, et al.Effectiveness of a telephone intervention based on motivational health coaching for improving the mental health of caregivers of people with dementia: A randomised controlled trial. Int J Older People Nurs2021; 16: e12398.
55.
SrisukNCameronJSkiCF, et al.Randomized controlled trial of family-based education for patients with heart failure and their carers. J Adv Nurs2017; 73: 857–870.
56.
SteffenAMGantJR. A telehealth behavioral coaching intervention for neurocognitive disorder family carers. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry2016; 31: 195–203.
57.
WuthrichVMRapeeRM. Telephone-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for treating symptoms of anxiety and depression in Parkinson’s disease: A pilot trial. Clin Gerontol2019; 42: 444–453.
58.
D’AvolioDGropperSSAppelbaumM, et al.The impact of a pilot telehealth coaching intervention to improve caregiver stress and well-being and to increase dietary protein intake of caregivers and their family members with dementia – interrupted by COVID-19. Dementia2023; 22: 1241–1258.
59.
MosherCEWingerJGHannaN, et al.Randomized pilot trial of a telephone symptom management intervention for symptomatic lung cancer patients and their family caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manage2016; 52: 469–482.
60.
HearnJHCotterIFinlayKA. Efficacy of internet-delivered mindfulness for improving depression in caregivers of people with spinal cord injuries and chronic neuropathic pain: A randomized controlled feasibility trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2019; 100: 17–25.
61.
Van MierloLDMeilandFJMVan De VenPM, et al.Evaluation of DEM-DISC, customized e-advice on health and social support services for informal carers and case managers of people with dementia; a cluster randomized trial. Int Psychogeriatr2015; 27: 1365–1378.
62.
BlusiMDalinRJongM. The benefits of e-health support for older family caregivers in rural areas. J Telemed Telecare2014; 20: 63–69.
63.
LaiFHYanEWYuKK, et al.The protective impact of telemedicine on persons with dementia and their caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ame J Geriatr Psychiatry2020; 28: 1175–1184.
64.
Fernández-GonzálezMLozano-LozanoMMartín-MartínL, et al.Is a telerehabilitation programme for older adults with hip fracture associated with burden of family caregivers who provide support?Digit Health2023; 9: 20552076231213574.
65.
ZarzyckiMMorrisonVBeiE, et al.Cultural and societal motivations for being informal caregivers: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis. Health Psychol Rev2023; 17: 247–276.
66.
GhoshSChoiWYWilliamsA, et al.Burden on caregivers of adults with multiple chronic conditions: Intersectionality of age, gender, education level, employment status, and impact on social life. Can J Aging2020; 39: 456–467.
67.
LeeKYefimovaMPugaF, et al.Gender differences in caregiver burden among family caregivers of persons with dementia. J Gerontol Nurs2021; 47: 33–42.
68.
IraniENiyomyartAHickmanRL. Systematic review of technology-based interventions targeting chronically ill adults and their caregivers. West J Nurs Res2020; 42: 974–992.
69.
ChiNCDemirisG. A systematic review of telehealth tools and interventions to support family caregivers. J Telemed Telecare2015; 21: 37–44.
70.
EstrelaMSemedoGRoqueF, et al.Sociodemographic determinants of digital health literacy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Inform2023; 177: 105124.
71.
YuenEWinterNSaviraF, et al.Digital health literacy and its association with sociodemographic characteristics, health resource use, and health outcomes: Rapid review. Interact J Med Res2024; 13: e46888.
72.
KelleyMMPowellTCamaraD, et al.Mobile health apps, family caregivers, and care planning: Scoping review. J Med Internet Res2024; 26: e46108.
73.
PetrovicMGaggioliA. Digital mental health tools for caregivers of older adults-a scoping review. Front Public Health2020; 8: 128.
74.
ZhaoYFengHHuM, et al.Web-based interventions to improve mental health in home caregivers of people with dementia: Meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res2019; 21: e13415.
75.
HuCKungSRummansTA, et al.Reducing caregiver stress with internet-based interventions: A systematic review of open-label and randomized controlled trials. J Am Med Inform Assoc2015; 22: e194–e209.
76.
ZhuXChenSHeM, et al.Life experience and identity of spousal caregivers of people with dementia: A qualitative systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud2024; 154: 104757.
77.
YuDSQiuCLiPWC, et al.Effects of dyadic care interventions for heart failure on patients’ and caregivers’ outcomes: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Int J Nurs Stud2024; 157: 104829.
78.
LuoXGaoLLiJ, et al.A critical literature review of dyadic web-based interventions to support cancer patients and their caregivers, and directions for future research. Psychooncology2020; 29: 38–48.
79.
NgHLWuXVYapSY, et al.Exploring the experiences of older adults and their caregivers in home-based palliative care setting: A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Semin Oncol Nurs2024; 40: 151753.
80.
MorganBNWindleGSharpR, et al.Ehealth and web-based interventions for informal carers of people with dementia in the community: Umbrella review. J Med Internet Res2022; 24: e36727. 24.
81.
YuYXiaoLUllahS, et al.The experiences of informal caregivers of people with dementia in web-based psychoeducation programs: Systematic review and metasynthesis. JMIR Aging2023; 6: e47152.
82.
OkaforAJMonahanM. Effectiveness of psychoeducation on burden among family caregivers of adults with schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurs Res Pract2023; 2023: 2167096.
83.
SherifaliDUsman AliMPloegJ, et al.Impact of internet-based interventions on caregiver mental health: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res2028; 20: e10668.
84.
Prieto-PrietoJMadrugaMAdsuarJC, et al.Effects of a home-based exercise program on health-related quality of life and physical fitness in dementia caregivers: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 9319.
85.
Denche-ZamoranoÁMuñoz-BermejoLCarlos-VivasJ, et al.A cross-sectional study about the associations between physical activity level, self-perceived health perception and mental health in informal caregivers of elderly or people with chronic conditions in Spain. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 5320.
86.
EganKJHodgsonWImperatoreG, et al.Supporting physical activity for informal caregivers during and beyond COVID-19: Exploring the feasibility, usability and acceptability of a digital health smartphone application, ‘CareFit’. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 12506.
87.
LiYLiJZhangY, et al.The effectiveness of e-health interventions on caregiver burden, depression, and quality of life in informal caregivers of patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Nurs Stud2022; 127: 104179.
88.
ZhouZWangYFengP, et al.Associations of caregiving knowledge and skills with caregiver burden, psychological well-being, and coping styles among primary family caregivers of people living with schizophrenia in China. Front Psychiatry2021; 12: 631420.
89.
SatoHNakaakiSSatoJ, et al.Caregiver self-efficacy and associated factors among caregivers of patients with dementia with Lewy bodies and caregivers of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Psychogeriatrics2021; 21: 783–794.
90.
RecepORKartalA. Influence of caregiver burden on well-being of family member caregivers of older adults. Psychogeriatrics2019; 19: 482–490.
91.
SedivaHCartwrightTRobertsonC, et al.Behavior change techniques in digital health interventions for midlife women: Systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth2022; 10: e37234.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
