Language sampling is a widely used means of language assessment; it is based on the collection and transcription of a child's language production in various communicative contexts. The need for social distancing due to the COVID-19 pandemic impacted language sampling and speech and language therapy services in general. The in-person assessment became extremely challenging leading to the immediate increased use of telepractice in speech and language therapy. This scoping review aimed to identify the use of telepractice for language sampling in speech and language therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods
A scoping review of existing literature was performed to collect evidence on using language sample collection via telepractice. A database search was conducted in PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Mendeley, Electronic, and grey bibliography in 2022. Articles were included if they met the inclusion criteria. The quality of each selected study was assessed using the modified critical appraisal skills program (CASP) checklist.
Results
Systematic searches identified 51 studies with six studies in total meeting the inclusion criteria. The results showed that telepractice was a necessary tool during the pandemic of COVID-19 to conduct language sampling in speech and language assessment.
Conclusion
Speech and language therapists (SLTs) effectively collected language samples through telepractice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although, to date, the literature on language sampling via telepractice is limited. The need for SLTs to rely on telepractice for language sampling warrants further investigation.
PezoldMJImgrundCMStorkelHL. Using computer programs for language sample analysis. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch2020; 51: 103–114.
2.
LeadholmBJMillerJF. Language Sample Analysis: The Wisconsin Guide. Milwaukee, WI: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction, 1992.
3.
VoniatiLArmostisSTafiadisD. Measures of naturalistic language for dialect-speaking children: The case of Cypriot Greek. Languages2023; 8: 21.
4.
ImgrundCMLoebDFBarlowSM. Expressive language in preschoolers born preterm: Results of language sample analysis and standardized assessment. J Speech Lang Hear Res2019; 62: 884–895.
5.
VoniatiLArmostisSTafiadisD. Language sampling practices: A review for clinicians. Evid Based Commun Assess Interv2021; 15: 24–45.
6.
Costanza-SmithA. The clinical utility of language samples. Perspect Lang Lear Educ2010; 17: 9–15.
7.
ManningBHarpoleAHarriottE, et al.Taking language samples home: Feasibility, reliability, and validity of child language samples conducted remotely with video chat versus in-person. J Speech Lang Hear Res2020; 63: 3982–3990.
8.
Tamis-LeMondaCSBornsteinMHBaumwellL. Maternal responsiveness and children's achievement of language milestones. Child Dev2001; 72: 748–767.
9.
BullardLMcDuffieAAbbedutoL. Distance delivery of a parent-implemented language intervention for young boys with fragile X syndrome. Autism Dev Lang Impair2017; 2: 10.
10.
KlatteISvan HeugtenVZwitserloodR,et al.Language sample analysis in clinical practice: Speech-language Pathologists’ barriers, facilitators, and needs. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch2022; 53: 1–16.
11.
WesterveldMGillonG. Language Sampling Protocol. New Zealand: University of Canterbury, 2002.
12.
RothanHAByrareddySN. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. J Autoimmun2020; 109: 102433.
13.
TohidastSAMansuriBBagheriR,et al.Provision of speech-language pathology services for the treatment of speech and language disorders in children during the COVID-19 pandemic: Problems, concerns, and solutions. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol2020; 138: 110262.
14.
HellewellJAbbottSGimmaA, et al.Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts. Lancet Global Health2020; 8: e488–e496.
15.
HaoYZhangSConnerA,et al.The evolution of telepractice use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives of pediatric speech-language pathologists. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18: 12197.
MashimaPADoarnCR. Overview of telehealth activities in speech-language pathology. Telemed J E Health2008; 14: 1101–1117.
18.
WalesDSkinnerLHaymanM. The efficacy of telehealth-delivered speech and language intervention for primary school-age children: A systematic review. Int J Telerehabil2017; 9: 55–70.
19.
WerfelKLGreyBJohnsonM, et al.Transitioning speech-language assessment to a virtual environment: Lessons learned from the ELLA study. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch2021; 52: 769–775.
20.
HallNBoisvertMSteeleR. Telepractice in the assessment and treatment of individuals with aphasia: A systematic review. Int J Telereh2013; 5: 27–38.
21.
GarciaRRoeserJKiddE. Online data collection to address language sampling bias: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. Linguist Vanguard2022: 2–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2021-0040
22.
SylvanLGoldsteinESteinbergE,et al.Another moment in time: A follow-up survey on speech-language Pathologists’ experiences with the COVID-19 pandemic during the fall of 2020. Perspect ASHA Special Interest Groups2021; 6: 1737–1752.
23.
BrennanDMGeorgeadisACBaronCR,et al.The effect of videoconference-based telerehabilitation on story retelling performance by brain-injured subjects and its implications for remote speech-language therapy. Telemed J E Health2004; 10: 147–154.
24.
ToweyMP. Speech telepractice: Installing a speech therapy upgrade for the 21st century. Int J Telerehabil2012; 4: 73–78.
25.
FongRTsaiCYiuO. The implementation of telepractice in speech language pathology in Hong Kong during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemed J E Health2021; 27: 30–38.
26.
GabelRGrogan-JohnsonSAlvaresR, et al.A field study of telepractice for school intervention using the ASHA NOMS K-12 database. Commun Disord Q2013; 35: 44–53.
LongHAFrenchDPBrooksJM. Optimising the value of the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis. Res Meth Med Health Sci2020; 1: 31–42.
29.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ,et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med2009; 6: e1000097.
30.
ButlerLLa ValleCSchwartzS, et al.Remote natural language sampling of parents and children with autism spectrum disorder: Role of activity and language level. Front Commun2022; 7: 820564.
31.
Del Hoyo SorianoLBullardLHoyos AlvarezC, et al.Using telehealth-delivered procedures to collect a parent-implemented expressive language sampling narrative task in monolingual and bilingual families with autism spectrum disorder: A pilot study. Front Rehab Sci2021; 2: 716550.
32.
McGillMSiegelJNourealN. A preliminary comparison of in-person and telepractice evaluations of stuttering. Am J Speech Lang Pathol2021; 30: 1737–1749.
33.
Castilla-EarlsARonderosJMcIlraithA,et al.Is bilingual receptive vocabulary assessment via telepractice comparable to face-to-face?Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch2021; 53: 454–465.
34.
WalkerJRichardsMBudwayE. Speech therapy telepractice services in Fiji: A multicultural experience for graduate student clinicians. Perspect ASHA SIGs2021; 6: 1857–1863.
35.
BrownR. A First Language: The Early Stages. England: George Allen & Unwin, 1973.
36.
HuxKMorris-FrieheMSangerDD. Language sampling practices: A survey of nine states. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch1993; 24: 84–91.
37.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Telepractice survey results, http://www.asha.org. 2016.
38.
Grogan-JohnsonSMeehanRMcCormickK,et al.Results of a national survey of preservice telepractice training in graduate speech-language pathology and audiology programs. Contemp Issues Commun Sci Disord2015; 42: 122–137.
39.
KramerCAJamesSLSaxmanJH. A comparison of language samples elicited at home and in the clinic. J Speech Hear Disord1979; 44: 321–330.
40.
LarsonALBarrettTSMcConnellSR. Exploring early childhood language environments: A comparison of language use, exposure, and interactions in the home and childcare settings. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch2020; 51: 706–719.
