Telerehabilitation may facilitate access and adherence to pulmonary rehabilitation. Given the heterogeneity in existing telerehabilitation studies, it is still necessary to identify the most effective, safe, and cost-efficient strategy for clinical implementation, as well as the necessary level of supervision during telerehabilitation. The aim of this review was to determine the effectiveness and safety of real-time telerehabilitation for chronic respiratory diseases and post-COVID-19 compared to no-rehabilitation, center-based rehabilitation or asynchronous telerehabilitation.
Methods
A comprehensive search was conducted in six databases until 30 April 2023. Clinical trials of real-time telerehabilitation supervised via videoconference in adults with diagnosis of any chronic respiratory disease or post-COVID-19 were included.
Results
Twelve studies with 1540 participants were included. Very-low to moderate certainty evidence showed no difference between real-time telerehabilitation and center-based pulmonary rehabilitation. Studies included in this review reported high adherence rates to real-time telerehabilitation and completion rate, with no difference compared to center-based pulmonary rehabilitation. When compared to no-rehabilitation, the results of this review provide low-certainty evidence that real-time telerehabilitation may have a potential effect on exercise capacity at the end of the intervention, with no better results in others outcomes. No studies comparing real-time telerehabilitation with asynchronous telerehabilitation were found.
Conclusion
Real-time telerehabilitation is safe and it seems to promote similar effects to center-based pulmonary rehabilitation. However, the certainty of this evidence ranged from very-low to moderate. Therefore, real-time telerehabilitation offers an alternative to center-based pulmonary rehabilitation models. This review provides a clear definition of real-time telerehabilitation, facilitating results interpretation and clinical applicability.
GBD Chronic Respiratory Disease Collaborators. Prevalence and attributable health burden of chronic respiratory diseases, 1990-2017: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet Respir Med2020; 8: 585–596.
2.
SpruitMASinghSJGarveyC, et al.An official American thoracic society/European respiratory society statement: Key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation [published correction appears in Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Jun 15; 189(12): 1570]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2013; 188: e13–e64.
3.
AhmedIMustafaogluRYeldanI, et al.Effect of pulmonary rehabilitation approaches on dyspnea, exercise capacity, fatigue, lung functions, and quality of life in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2022; 103: 2051–2062.
4.
Kurtaiş AytürYKöseoğluBFÖzyemişçi TaşkıranÖ, et al.Pulmonary rehabilitation principles in SARS-COV-2 infection (COVID-19): A guideline for the acute and subacute rehabilitation. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil2020; 66: 104–120.
5.
LiuKZhangWYangY, et al.Respiratory rehabilitation in elderly patients with COVID-19: A randomized controlled study. Complement Ther Clin Pract2020; 39: 101166.
6.
Reina-GutiérrezSTorres-CostosoAMartínez-VizcaínoV, et al.Effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation in interstitial lung disease, including coronavirus diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2021; 102: 1989–1997.e3.
7.
ReinertGMüllerDWagnerP, et al.Pulmonary rehabilitation in SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis of post-acute patients. Diagnostics (Basel)2022; 12: 3032.
8.
ZampognaEPaneroniMBelliS, et al.Pulmonary rehabilitation in patients recovering from COVID-19. Respiration2021; 100: 416–422.
FengZWangJXieY,et al.Effects of exercise-based pulmonary rehabilitation on adults with asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Res2021; 22: 33.
11.
GuellRCasanPBeldaJ, et al.Long-term effects of outpatient rehabilitation of COPD: A randomized trial. Chest2000; 117: 976–983.
12.
McCarthyBCaseyDDevaneD, et al.Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2015; 2015: CD003793.
13.
KeatingALeeAHollandAE. What prevents people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from attending pulmonary rehabilitation? A systematic review. Chron Respir Dis2011; 8: 89–99.
14.
DesveauxLJanaudis-FerreiraTGoldsteinR,et al.An international comparison of pulmonary rehabilitation: A systematic review. COPD2015; 12: 144–153.
15.
BrennanDMTindallLTheodorosD, et al.A blueprint for telerehabilitation guidelines – October 2010. Telemed J E Health2011; 17: 662–665.
16.
KairyDLehouxPVincentC,et al.A systematic review of clinical outcomes, clinical process, healthcare utilization and costs associated with telerehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil2009; 31: 427–447.
17.
HollandAECoxNSHouchen-WolloffL, et al.Defining modern pulmonary rehabilitation. An official American Thoracic Society workshop report. Ann Am Thorac Soc2021; 18: e12–e29.
18.
KernJ. Evaluation of teleconsultation systems. Int J Med Inform2006; 75: 330–334.
19.
ThomasEEHaydonHMMehrotraA, et al.Building on the momentum: Sustaining telehealth beyond COVID-19. J Telemed Telecare2022; 28: 301–308.
20.
Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Global strategy for Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; 2023. Available from: www.goldcopd.org.
21.
LeochicoCFDEspirituAIIgnacioSD,et al.Challenges to the emergence of telerehabilitation in a developing country: A systematic review. Front Neurol2020; 11: 1007.
22.
CoxNSDal CorsoSHansenH, et al.Telerehabilitation for chronic respiratory disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2021; 1: CD013040.
23.
TsutsuiMGerayeliFSinDD. Pulmonary rehabilitation in a post-COVID-19 world: Telerehabilitation as a new standard in patients with COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis2021; 16: 379–391.
24.
LeeALGoldsteinRS. The role of telemedicine. In: AnzuetoAHeijdraYHurstJR (eds) Controversies in COPD. Sheffield, United Kingdom: European Respiratory Society, 2015, pp.269–296.
25.
BeinartNAGoodchildCEWeinmanJA, et al.Individual and intervention-related factors associated with adherence to home exercise in chronic low back pain: A systematic review. Spine J2013; 13: 1940–1950.
26.
WilkeJMohrLYukiG, et al.Train at home, but not alone: A randomised controlled multicentre trial assessing the effects of live-streamed tele-exercise during COVID-19-related lockdowns. Br J Sports Med2022; 56: 667–675.
27.
McCambridgeJWittonJElbourneDR. Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: New concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J Clin Epidemiol2014; 67: 267–277.
28.
CostaRRDornelesJRVelosoJH, et al.Synchronous and asynchronous tele-exercise during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: Comparisons of implementation and training load in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Telemed Telecare2021; 18: 1357633X–13209827.
29.
HagemanDFokkenroodHJGommansLN, et al.Supervised exercise therapy versus home-based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent claudication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2018; 4: CD005263.
30.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J2021; 372: n71.
31.
HigginsJPChurchillRChandlerJ, et al.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.3 (Updated February 2022). The Cochrane Collaboration 2022. Available at: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
32.
HwangRBruningJMorrisN, et al.A systematic review of the effects of telerehabilitation in patients with cardiopulmonary diseases. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev2015; 35: 380–389.
33.
OuzzaniMHammadyHFedorowiczZ,et al.Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev2016; 5: 210.
34.
The Nordic Cochrane Centre. The Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3.5. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
35.
HigginsJPTAltmanDGGøtzschePC, et al.The Cochrane Collaboration’s Tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Br Med J2011; 343: d5928–d5928.
36.
SterneJAHernánMAReevesBC, et al.ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. Br Med J2016; 355: i4919.
37.
HigginsJPThompsonSGDeeksJJ,et al.Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J2003; 327: 557–560.
38.
SchünemannHBrożekJGuyattG,et al.Handbook for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using the GRADE approach (updated October 2013). GRADE Working Group, 2013. Available at: gdt.guidelinedevelopment.org/app/handbook/handbook.html.
39.
SchünemannHJOxmanADVistGE, et al.on behalf of the Cochrane Applicability and Recommendations Methods Group. Chapter 12: Interpreting results and drawing conclusions. In: Higgins JPT, Churchill R, Chandler J, Cumpston MS, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2022. Available at: training.cochrane.org/handbook.
40.
BhattSPPatelSBAndersonEM, et al.Video telehealth pulmonary rehabilitation intervention in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease reduces 30-day readmissions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2019; 200: 511–513.
41.
CapinJJJolleySEMorrowM, et al.Safety, feasibility and initial efficacy of an app-facilitated telerehabilitation (AFTER) programme for COVID-19 survivors: A pilot randomised study. BMJ Open2022; 12: e061285.
42.
ColasCBayleMLabeixP, et al.Management of long COVID-the CoviMouv’ pilot study: Importance of adapted physical activity for prolonged symptoms following SARS-CoV2 infection. Front Sports Act Living2022; 4: 877188.
43.
CoxNSMcDonaldCFMahalA, et al.Telerehabilitation for chronic respiratory disease: A randomised controlled equivalence trial. Thorax2022; 77: 643–651.
44.
De SouzaYMacedoJNascimentoR, et al.Low-intensity pulmonary rehabilitation through videoconference for post-acute COVID-19 patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2021; 203: A4124.
45.
HajizadehNPoloJOrdonezK, et al.Referral to telehealth delivered pulmonary rehabilitation (TelePR) versus standard pulmonary rehabilitation (SPR) in Hispanic and African patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbations: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2020; 201: A6127.
46.
HansenHBielerTBeyerN, et al.Supervised pulmonary tele-rehabilitation versus pulmonary rehabilitation in severe COPD: A randomised multicentre trial. Thorax2020; 75: 413–421.
47.
KnoxLDunningMDaviesCA, et al.Safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of virtual pulmonary rehabilitation in the real world. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis2019; 14: 775–780.
48.
MartinIBraemFBaudetL, et al.Follow-up of functional exercise capacity in patients with COVID-19: It is improved by telerehabilitation. Respir Med2021; 183: 106438.
49.
PehlivanEPalalıİAtanSG, et al.The effectiveness of POST-DISCHARGE telerehabilitation practices in COVID-19 patients: Tele-COVID study-randomized controlled trial. Ann Thorac Med2022; 17: 110–117.
50.
SticklandMJourdainTWongEY, et al.Using telehealth technology to deliver pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Can Respir J2011; 18: 216–220.
51.
TsaiLLMcNamaraRJModdelC, et al.Home-based telerehabilitation via real-time videoconferencing improves endurance exercise capacity in patients with COPD: The randomized controlled TeleR study. Respirology2017; 22: 699–707.
52.
OliveiraALAAndradeLMarquesA. Minimal clinically important difference and predictive validity of the mMRC and mBorg in acute exacerbations of COPD. Eur Respir J2017; 50: PA4705.
53.
PuhanMAFreyMBüchiS, et al.The minimal important difference of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes2008; 6: 46.
54.
ZatloukalJWardSHouchen-WolloffL, et al.The minimal important difference for the endurance shuttle walk test in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease following a course of pulmonary rehabilitation. Chron Respir Dis2019; 16: 147997311985382.
55.
ReychlerGPirauxEBeaumontM, et al.Telerehabilitation as a form of pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic lung disease: A systematic review. Healthcare (Basel)2022; 10: 1795.
56.
GarberCEBlissmerBDeschenesMR, et al.American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: Guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc2011; 43: 1334–1359.
57.
MorrisNRWalshJAdamsL,et al.Exercise training in COPD: What is it about intensity?Respirology2016; 21: 1185–1192.
58.
Valverde-MartínezMÁLópez-LiriaRMartínez-CalJ, et al.Telerehabilitation, A viable option in patients with persistent post-COVID syndrome: A systematic review. Healthcare (Basel)2023; 11: 187.
59.
Vinolo-GilMHerrera-SánchezCMartin-VegaF, et al.Eficacia de la tele-rehabilitación en pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica: Una revisión sistemática. An Sist Sanit Navar2022; 45: e0999.
60.
SeidmanZMcNamaraRWoottonS, et al.People attending pulmonary rehabilitation demonstrate a substantial engagement with technology and willingness to use telerehabilitation: A survey. J Physiother2017; 63: 175–181.
61.
Gallegos-RejasVMThomasEEKellyJT,et al.A multi-stakeholder approach is needed to reduce the digital divide and encourage equitable access to telehealth. J Telemed Telecare2023; 29: 73–78.
62.
SmithACThomasESnoswellCL, et al.Telehealth for global emergencies: Implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Telemed Telecare2020; 26: 309–313.
63.
McNamaraRJDaleMMcKeoughZJ. Innovative strategies to improve the reach and engagement in pulmonary rehabilitation. J Thorac Dis2019; 11: S2192–S2199.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
