This systematic review compared clinical, service and cost effectiveness of telephone consultations (TC) to video consultations (VC).
Methods
We searched Embase, CINAHL and MEDLINE for empirical studies that compared TC to VC using clinical, service or economic outcome measures. Clinician or patient preference and satisfaction studies were excluded. Findings were synthesised descriptively.
Results
A total of 79 articles were included. The most effective modality was found to be VC in 40 studies (50%) and TC in 3 (4%). VC and TC were found to be equivalent in 28 of the included articles (35%). VC were superior or equivalent to TC for all clinical outcomes. When compared to TC, VC were likely to have better patient engagement and retention, to improve transfer decisions, and reduce downstream sub-acute care utilisation. The impact of telehealth modality on consultation time, completion rates, failure-to-attend rates and acute care utilisation was mixed. VC were consistently found to be more cost effective despite having a higher incremental cost than TC.
Conclusions
Our systematic review demonstrates equal or better, but not inferior clinical and cost outcomes for consultations delivered by VC when compared to TC. VC appear to be more clinically effective when visual information is required, when verbal communication with the patient is impaired and when patient engagement and retention is linked to clinical outcomes. We have provided conditions where VC should be used in preference to TC. These can be used by clinicians to guide the choice of telehealth modality. Cost effectiveness is also important to consider when choosing modality.
SmithACThomasESnoswellCL, et al.Telehealth for global emergencies: implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Telemed Telecare2020; 26: 309–313.
2.
SnoswellCLCafferyLJHaydonHM, et al.Telehealth uptake in general practice as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Aust Health Rev2020; 44: 737–740.
3.
ThomasEEHaydonHMMehrotraA, et al.Building on the momentum: sustaining telehealth beyond COVID-19. J Telemed Telecare2022; 28: 301–308.
4.
SnoswellCLArnautovskaUHaydonHM, et al.Increase in telemental health services on the Medicare Benefits Schedule after the start of the coronavirus pandemic: data from 2019 to 2021. Aust Health Rev2022; 46: 544–549.
5.
GreenhalghTLaddsEHughesG, et al.Why do GPs rarely do video consultations? Qualitative study in UK general practice. Br J Gen Pract2022; 72: e351–ee60.
6.
LimSMKimJSSJ. Physicians’ perception toward using telephone consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Korea. J Kor Med Assoc2021; 64: 852–863.
7.
RosenRGreenhalghT. How can remote GP consultations be safer?BMJ2022; 379: o2843.
8.
RushKLHowlettLMunroA,et al.Videoconference compared to telephone in healthcare delivery: a systematic review. Int J Med Inf2018; 118: 44–53.
9.
ChenPVHelmACaloudasSG, et al.Evidence of phone vs video-conferencing for mental health treatments: a review of the literature. Curr Psychiatry Rep2022; 24: 529–539.
10.
KepplingerJBarlinnKDeckertS, et al.Safety and efficacy of thrombolysis in telestroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology2016; 87: 1344–1351.
11.
Carrillo de AlbornozSSiaK-LHarrisA. The effectiveness of teleconsultations in primary care: systematic review. Fam Pract2022; 39: 168–182.
12.
MoherDShamseerLClarkeM, et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Rev Esp Nutr Hum Diet2016; 20: 148–160.
13.
OgrincGDaviesLGoodmanD, et al.SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. J Contin Educ Nurs2015; 46: 501–507.
14.
National Health and Medical Research Council. APPENDIX F: levels of evidence and recommendation grading. National Institute of Clinical Studies. Emergency department stroke and transient ischaemic attack care bundle: information and implementation guide. Melbourne: Commonwealth of Australia, 2009.
15.
YücelÜYücelM. The effect of phone and video counseling given to participants living with obesity on weight loss and quality of life in the COVID-19 pandemic: an RCT. J Hum Nutr Diet2022; 36: 1417–1424.
16.
MeyerBCRamanRHemmenT, et al.Efficacy of site-independent telemedicine in the STRokE DOC trial: a randomised, blinded, prospective study. Lancet Neurol2008; 7: 787–795.
17.
DemaerschalkBMRamanRErnstromK,et al.Efficacy of telemedicine for stroke: pooled analysis of the stroke team remote evaluation using a digital observation camera (STRokE DOC) and STRokE DOC Arizona telestroke trials. Telemed J E Health2012; 18: 230–237.
18.
MorganGJCraigBGrantB, et al.Home videoconferencing for patients with severe congential heart disease following discharge. Congenit Heart Dis2008; 3: 317–324.
19.
LiLHuangJWuJ, et al.A mobile health app for the collection of functional outcomes after inpatient stroke rehabilitation: pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth2020; 8: e17219.
20.
HillMLCronkiteRCOtaDT, et al.Validation of home telehealth for pressure ulcer assessment: a study in patients with spinal cord injury. J Telemed Telecare2009; 15: 196–202.
21.
JanssenFAwadallahMAlhalabiA, et al.Telemedicine in general neurology: use of audiovisual consultation for on call back-up service in an acute care hospital. J Neurol2018; 265: 880–884.
22.
LaiF-yEW-hYKK-yY, et al.The protective impact of telemedicine on persons with dementia and their caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry2020; 28: 1175–1184.
23.
SammourYMainMLAustinBA, et al.Outpatient management of guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure using telehealth: a comparison of in-office, video, and telephone visits. J Card Fail2022; 28: 1222–1226.
24.
YuanNBottingPGEladY, et al.Practice patterns and patient outcomes after widespread adoption of remote heart failure care. Circ Heart Fail2021; 14: E008573.
25.
PoonWSLeungCHSLamMK, et al.The comparative impact of video-consultation on neurosurgical health services. Int J Med Inf2001; 62: 175–180.
26.
VasireddySWigSHannidesM. Technical factors can impact on remote consultations in rheumatology: results from a service evaluation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rheumatol Int2022; 42: 999–1007.
27.
DavisAMSampiloMGallagherKS, et al.Treating rural paediatric obesity through telemedicine vs. telephone: outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial. J Telemed Telecare2016; 22: 86–95.
28.
BadgerTSegrinCPasvogelA,et al.The effect of psychosocial interventions delivered by telephone and videophone on quality of life in early-stage breast cancer survivors and their supportive partners. J Telemed Telecare2013; 19: 260–265.
29.
LiebmannEPRichterKPPreacherKJ, et al.Identifying pathways to quitting smoking via telemedicine-delivered care. Health Psychol2019; 38: 638–647.
30.
KimSSSitthisongkramSBernsteinK, et al.A randomized controlled trial of a videoconferencing smoking cessation intervention for Korean American women: preliminary findings. Int J Womens Health2016; 8: 453–462.
31.
WakefieldBJHolmanJERayA, et al.Outcomes of a home telehealth intervention for patients with heart failure. J Telemed Telecare2009; 15: 46–50.
32.
DemaerschalkBMBobrowBJRamanR, et al.Stroke team remote evaluation using a digital observation camera in Arizona: the initial Mayo clinic experience trial. Stroke2010; 41: 1251–1258.
33.
PhillipsVLVesmarovichSHauberR, et al.Telehealth: reaching out to newly injured spinal cord patients. Public Health Rep2001; 116: 94–102.
34.
RoweSJParatzEDFahyL, et al.Telehealth in Australian cardiology: insight into factors predicting the use of telephone versus video during the COVID-19 pandemic. Intern Med J2021; 51: 1229–1235.
35.
GonzalezTTuckerKWakefieldCE, et al.Comparing cancer genetic counselling using telegenetics with in-person and telephone appointments: results of a partially randomised patient-preference pilot study. J Telemed Telecare2022; 0(0): 1357633X221112556.
36.
BogulskiCAPayakachatNRhoadsSJ, et al.A comparison of audio-only and audio-visual tele-lactation consultation services: a mixed methods approach. J Hum Lact2023; 39: 93–106.
37.
SibandaVOnuboguIRaadM, et al.How effective are telephone and video consultations in shoulder and elbow clinics? Analysis using an objective scoring tool. Cureus2021; 13: e17380.
38.
KimSSDarwishSLeeSA, et al.A randomized controlled pilot trial of a smoking cessation intervention for US women living with HIV: telephone-based video call vs voice call. Int J Womens Health2018; 10: 545–555.
39.
FrostMCZhangLKimHM,et al.Use of and retention on video, telephone, and in-person buprenorphine treatment for opioid use disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open2022; 5: e2236298–e.
40.
GainerDMWongCEmbreeJA, et al.Effects of telehealth on dropout and retention in care among treatment-seeking individuals with substance use disorder: a retrospective cohort study. Subst Use Misuse2023; 58: 481–490.
41.
HandschuRSciborMSchwabS, et al.Teleneurology in stroke management: costs of service in different organizational models. J Neurol2014; 261: 2003–2008.
42.
YangNHDharmarMYooB-K, et al.Economic evaluation of pediatric telemedicine consultations to rural emergency departments. Med Decis Making2015; 35: 773–783.
43.
McCrossanBMorganGGrantB, et al.A randomised trial of a remote home support programme for infants with major congenital heart disease. Heart2012; 98: 1523–1528.
44.
JerantAFAzariRNesbittTS, et al.Reducing the cost of frequent hospital admissions for congestive heart failure: a randomized trial of a home telecare intervention. Med Care2001; 39: 1234–1245.
45.
GrenCHasselagerABLinderothG, et al.Video triage of children with respiratory symptoms at a medical helpline is safe and feasible – a prospective quality improvement study. PLoS ONE2023; 18: e0284557.
46.
HarveyJBYeagerBECramerC, et al.The impact of telemedicine on pediatric critical care triage. Pediatr Crit Care Med2017; 18: e555–ee60.
47.
HaynesSCDharmarMHillBC, et al.The impact of telemedicine on transfer rates of newborns at rural community hospitals. Acad Pediatr2020; 20: 636–641.
48.
LabarberaJMEllenbyMSBouressaP, et al.The impact of telemedicine intensivist support and a pediatric hospitalist program on a community hospital. Telemed e-Health2013; 19: 760–766.
49.
MarcinJPSauers-FordHSMouzoonJL, et al.Impact of tele-emergency consultations on pediatric interfacility transfers: a cluster-randomized crossover trial. JAMA Network Open2023; 6: e2255770.
50.
YangNHDharmarMKuppermannN, et al.Appropriateness of disposition following telemedicine consultations in rural emergency departments. Pediatr Crit Care Med2015; 16: e59–e64.
51.
BraceyJMorellSTaitM, et al.Assessment of telemedicine and phone consultation effects on rate of hand transfers to trauma centers and specialty services referrals. Hand2021; 18(4): 668–672.
52.
AkintomideEShahBSridharanS, et al.Clinical perception of effectiveness of virtual appointments and comparison with appointment outcomes at a specialist children's hospital. Future Healthc J2021; 8: e660–e6e5.
53.
McCrossanBMorganGGrantB, et al.Assisting the transition from hospital to home for children with major congenital heart disease by telemedicine: a feasibility study and initial results. Med Inform Internet Med2007; 32: 297–304.
54.
RyanMCarringtonCWardEC, et al.Changing from telephone to videoconference for pre-treatment pharmacist consults in cancer services: impacts to funding and time efficiency. J Telemed Telecare2021; 27: 680–684.
55.
ChenKZhangCGurleyA, et al.Appointment non-attendance for telehealth versus in-person primary care visits at a large public healthcare system. J Gen Intern Med2023; 38: 922–928.
56.
PrebayZJLankfordJGunasekaranV, et al.A cross-sectional analysis of factors associated with appointment completion and visit modality during virtual urology visits. Urol Pract2021; 8: 661–667.
57.
SykoraRRenzaMRuzickaJ, et al.Audiovisual consults by paramedics to reduce hospital transport after low-urgency calls: randomized controlled trial. Prehosp Disaster Med2020; 35: 656–662.
58.
HarkeyKKaiserNZhaoJ, et al.Utilization of telemedicine to provide post-discharge care: a comparison of pre-pandemic vs. pandemic care. Am J Surg2023; 226: 163–169.
59.
LiKYKimPSThariathJ, et al.Standard nurse phone triage versus tele–emergency care pilot on veteran use of in-person acute care: an instrumental variable analysis. Acad Emerg Med2023; 30: 310–320.
60.
HullickCConwayJHallA, et al.Video-telehealth to support clinical assessment and management of acutely unwell older people in residential aged care: a pre-post intervention study. BMC Geriatr2022; 22: 1–9.
61.
JerantAFAzariRMartinezC,et al.A randomized trial of telenursing to reduce hospitalization for heart failure: patient-centered outcomes and nursing indicators. Home Health Care Serv Q2003; 22: 1–20.
62.
Sanchez-GuarnidoAJUrquizaBMDel Mar Soler SanchezM, et al.Teletherapy and hospitalizations in patients with serious mental illness during the COVID- 19 pandemic: a retrospective multicenter study. PLoS ONE2022; 17: e0267209.
63.
SammourYSpertusJAShatlaI, et al.Comparison of video and telephone visits in outpatients with heart failure. Am J Cardiol2021; 158: 153–156.
64.
Meshberg-CohenSFarookMGrossG, et al.Treatment utilization and modality preference among veterans receiving outpatient substance use disorder treatment during a pandemic. Am J Addict2023; 32: 32–39.
65.
RyanMWardECBurnsCL, et al.An evaluation of telephone versus videoconference consults for pre-treatment medication history taking by cancer pharmacists. J Telemed Telecare2022; 28: 750–756.
66.
NguyenD-DNguyenAX-LBouhadanaD, et al.Pilot trial of telemedicine in urology: video vs. telephone consultations. Can Urol Assoc J2021; 16: 104–111.
67.
SohailMLongDKayE, et al.Role of visit modality in the HIV-related no-shows during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multisite retrospective cohort study. AIDS Behav2023; 27: 2478–2487.
68.
JieHGopalanAMuellyE, et al.Primary care video and telephone telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: treatment and follow-up health care utilization. Am J Managed Care2023; 29: e13–ee7.
69.
JuergensNHuangJGopalanA, et al.The association between video or telephone telemedicine visit type and orders in primary care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak2022; 22: 1–8.
70.
YuanNPevnickJMBottingPG, et al.Patient use and clinical practice patterns of remote cardiology clinic visits in the era of COVID-19. JAMA Network Open2021; 4: e214157–e.
71.
HandschuRSciborMWillaczekB, et al.Telemedicine in acute stroke: remote video-examination compared to simple telephone consultation. J Neurol2008; 255: 1792–1797.
72.
PatelSHertzogJHPenfilS,et al.A prospective pilot study of the use of telemedicine during pediatric transport: a high-quality, low-cost alternative to conventional telemedicine systems. Pediatr Emerg Care2015; 31: 611–615.
73.
DharmarMRomanoPSKuppermannN, et al.Impact of critical care telemedicine consultations on children in rural emergency departments. Crit Care Med2013; 41: 2388–2395.
74.
AHPRA. Guidelines: telehealth consultations with patients, 2023.
75.
Department of Health. Medicare benefits schedule review taskforce final report. Australia; 2020.
76.
PichanCMAndersonCEMinLC,et al.Geriatric education on telehealth (GET) access: a medical student volunteer program to increase access to geriatric telehealth services at the onset of COVID-19. J Telemed Telecare2021; 29(10): 816–824.
77.
BrewsterRCZhangJStewartM, et al.A prescription for internet: feasibility of a tablet loaner program to address digital health inequities. Appl Clin Inform2023; 14: 273–278.
78.
Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US), 2001.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
