Many assessment methods are used in physiotherapy to analyze the fitness level and injury risk in athletes, and to determine the general health status and the effectiveness of the treatment applied in patients. Considering the need for telehealth use, it is essential to determine the usability of tests performed as tele-assessment. This study aimed to examine the intra-rater reliability, validity, and feasibility of the tele-assessment version of core strength and endurance and functional capacity assessments in healthy individuals.
Methods
“Curl-up,” “Modified Push-up,” “Plank,” and “Lateral Bridge” tests were used for core strength and endurance performance assessment, and “Timed Up and Go,” “30 second Sit to Stand,” and “Functional Reach Test” tests were used for functional capacity assessment in healthy individuals. Participants were evaluated first by tele-assessment, then one hour later on the same day, all assessments were repeated face-to-face procedures by the researchers thus the validity of the tele-assessment method was determined. All tests were applied as tele-assessment one week later to determine the intra-rater reliability of the tele-assessment method. The system usability scale was applied to evaluate the usability of our tele-assessment method.
Results
Eighty healthy people were enrolled. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.91 and 0.97 for core performance tests and between 0.95 and 0.97 for functional tests. All tele-assessment versions of the core performance and functional tests were highly correlated with the face-to-face versions.
Discussion
Core strength-endurance and functional tests performed via tele-assessment were reliable, valid, and feasible for practically measuring the performance of healthy young adults. This study supports the tele-assessment versions of these tests.
ManiSSharmaSSinghDK. Concurrent validity and reliability of telerehabilitation-based physiotherapy assessment of cervical spine in adults with non-specific neck pain. J Telemed Telecare2021; 27: 88–97.
2.
DodakianLMcKenzieALLeV, et al.A home-based telerehabilitation program for patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair2017; 31: 923–933.
3.
TurollaARossettiniGVicecontiA,et al.Musculoskeletal physical therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: Is telerehabilitation the answer?Phys Ther2020; 100: 1260–1264.
4.
SmithACThomasESnoswellCL, et al.Telehealth for global emergencies: implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Telemed Telecare2020; 26: 309–313.
5.
MalliarasPMerolliMWilliamsC,et al.‘It's not hands-on therapy, so it's very limited’: Telehealth use and views among allied health clinicians during the coronavirus pandemic. Musculoskelet Sci Pract2021; 52: 102340.
6.
ThomasEEHaydonHMMehrotraA, et al.Building on the momentum: Sustaining telehealth beyond COVID-19. J Telemed Telecare2022; 28: 301–308.
7.
CottrellMARussellTG. Telehealth for musculoskeletal physiotherapy. Musculoskelet Sci Pract2020; 48: 102193.
8.
FeldmanRSchreiberSPickCG,et al.Gait, balance, mobility and muscle strength in people with anxiety compared to healthy individuals. Hum Mov Sci2019; 67: 102513.
9.
BenjaminseAOttenBGokelerA,et al.Motor learning strategies in basketball players and its implications for ACL injury prevention: A randomized controlled trial.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc2017; 25: 2365–2376.
10.
BrunnerRFriesenbichlerBCasartelliNC,et al.Effectiveness of multicomponent lower extremity injury prevention programmes in team-sport athletes: An umbrella review. Br J Sports Med2019; 53: 282–288.
11.
SugimotoDJacksonSSHowellDR,et al.Association between training volume and lower extremity overuse injuries in young female athletes: Implications for early sports specialization. Phys Sportsmed2019; 47: 199–204.
12.
Dos’SantosTThomasCComfortP,et al.The effect of training interventions on change of direction biomechanics associated with increased anterior cruciate ligament loading: A scoping review. Sports Med2019; 49: 1837–1859.
13.
SantosMSBehmDGBarbadoD,et al.Core endurance relationships with athletic and functional performance in inactive people. Front Physiol2019; 10: 1490.
14.
BorghuisJHofALLemminkKA. The importance of sensory-motor control in providing core stability. Sports Med2008; 38: 893–916.
15.
Huxel BlivenKCAndersonBE. Core stability training for injury prevention. Sports Health2013; 5: 514–522.
16.
MartuscelloJMNuzzoJLAshleyCD,et al.Systematic review of core muscle activity during physical fitness exercises. J Strength Cond Res2013; 27: 1684–1698.
17.
WhilerLFongMKimS, et al.Gluteus medius and minimus muscle structure, strength, and function in healthy adults: brief report. Physiother Can2017; 69: 212–216.
18.
VillalbaMMCarlosLCEltzGD, et al.Comparison of the effects of different physical activities on laterality and asymmetry values through side bridge testMotriz: Revista de Educação Física2019; 25: 1–5.
19.
KloekCJBossenDde VriesHJ,et al.Physiotherapists’ experiences with a blended osteoarthritis intervention: a mixed methods study. Physiother Theory Pract2020; 36: 572–579.
20.
Cabrera-MartosIOrtiz-RubioATorres-SánchezI,et al.Agreement between face-to-face and tele-assessment of upper limb functioning in patients with Parkinson disease. PM&R2019; 11: 590–596.
21.
Heredia-CiuróALazo-PradosABlasco-VallsP, et al.Agreement between face-to-face and tele-assessment of upper limb disability in lung cancer survivors during COVID-19 era. J Telemed Telecare2022: 1357633X221079543.
22.
AssociationWM. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA2013; 310: 2191–2194.
23.
PrajapatiBDunneMArmstrongR. Sample size estimation and statistical power analyses. Optometry Today2010; 16: 10–18.
24.
OrsmondGICohnES. The distinctive features of a feasibility study: objectives and guiding questions. OTJR Occup Particip Health2015; 35: 169–177.
25.
KibarSYardimciFÖEvcikD, et al.Can a pilates exercise program be effective on balance, flexibility and muscle endurance? A randomized controlled trial. J Sports Med Phys Fitness2015; 56: 1139–1146.
26.
LudewigPMHoffMSOsowskiEE,et al.Relative balance of serratus anterior and upper trapezius muscle activity during push-up exercises. Am J Sports Med2004; 32: 484–493.
27.
CowleyPMFitzgeraldSSottungK,et al.Age, weight, and the front abdominal power test as predictors of isokinetic trunk strength and work in young men and women. J Strength Cond Res2009; 23: 915–925.
28.
McGillSMChildsALiebensonC. Endurance times for low back stabilization exercises: clinical targets for testing and training from a normal database. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1999; 80: 941–944.
29.
BohannonRW. Reference values for the timed up and go test: a descriptive meta-analysis. J Geriatr Phys Ther2006; 29: 64–68.
30.
Roldán-JiménezCBennettPCuesta-VargasAI. Muscular activity and fatigue in lower-limb and trunk muscles during different sit-to-stand tests. PLoS One2015; 10: e0141675.
31.
DuncanPWWeinerDKChandlerJ,et al.Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol1990; 45: M192–M1M7.
32.
BrookeJ. SUS: a retrospective. J Usability Stud2013; 8: 29–40.
33.
Sevilla-GonzalezMDRLoaezaLMLazaro-CarreraLS, et al.Spanish version of the system usability scale for the assessment of electronic tools: development and validation. JMIR Hum Factors2020; 7: e21161.
34.
Demi˙rkolDŞenelerÇ. A Turkish translation of the system usability scale: the SUS-TR. Uşak Üniv Sos Bilim Derg2018; 11: 237–253.
35.
LandisJR. Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics1977; 33: 159–174.
36.
BeckermanHRoebroeckMLankhorstG,et al.Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness. Qual Life Res2001; 10: 571–578.
37.
SmidtNvan der WindtDAAssendelftWJ, et al.Interobserver reproducibility of the assessment of severity of complaints, grip strength, and pressure pain threshold in patients with lateral epicondylitis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2002; 83: 1145–1150.
38.
de SmithMJ. Statistical analysis handbook. Edinburgh: The Winchelsea Press, 2018.
39.
ManiSSharmaSOmarB,et al.Validity and reliability of internet-based physiotherapy assessment for musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare2017; 23: 379–391.
40.
Palacín-MarínFEsteban-MorenoBOleaN,et al.Agreement between telerehabilitation and face-to-face clinical outcome assessments for low back pain in primary care. Spine2013; 38: 947–952.
41.
SpinaETrojsiFTozzaS, et al.How to manage with telemedicine people with neuromuscular diseases?Neurol Sci2021; 42: 3553–3559.
42.
PacholekMZemkováE. Effects of verbal encouragement and performance feedback on physical fitness in young adults. Sustainability2022; 14: 1753.
43.
EdwardsAMDutton-ChallisLCottrellD,et al.Impact of active and passive social facilitation on self-paced endurance and sprint exercise: encouragement augments performance and motivation to exercise. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med2018; 4: e000368.
