Farmers have a high risk for depression (MDD). Preventive measures targeting this often remotely living population might reduce depression burden. The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of personalized telephone coaching in reducing depressive symptom severity and preventing MDD in farmers compared to enhanced treatment as usual (TAU + ).
Methods
In a two-armed, pragmatic randomized controlled trial (N = 314) with post-treatment at 6 months, farming entrepreneurs, collaborating family members and pensioners with elevated depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥ 5) were randomized to personalized telephone coaching or TAU + . The coaching was provided by psychologists and consists on average of 13 (±7) sessions a 48 min (±15) over 6 months. The primary outcome was depressive symptom severity (QIDS-SR16).
Results
Coaching participants showed a significantly greater reduction in depressive symptom severity compared to TAU + (d = 0.39). Whereas reliable symptom deterioration was significantly lower in the intervention group compared to TAU + , no significant group differences were found for reliable improvement and in depression onset. Further significant effects in favor of the intervention group were found for stress (d = 0.34), anxiety (d = 0.30), somatic symptoms (d = 0.39), burnout risk (d = 0.24–0.40) and quality of life (d = 0.28).
Discussion
Limiting, we did not apply an upper cutoff score for depressive symptom severity or controlled for previous MDD episodes, leaving open whether the coaching was recurrence/relapse prevention or early treatment. Nevertheless, personalized telephone coaching can effectively improve mental health in farmers. It could play an important role in intervening at an early stage of mental health problems and reducing disease burden related to MDD.
Gutiérrez-RojasLPorras-SegoviaADunneH,et al.Prevalence and correlates of major depressive disorder: a systematic review. Braz J Psychiatry2020; 42: 657–672.
2.
LépineJPBrileyM. The increasing burden of depression. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat2011; 7: 3–7.
3.
FerrariAJCharlsonFJNormanRE, et al.Burden of depressive disorders by country, sex, age, and year: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. PLoS Med2013; 11: 1001547.
4.
GreenbergPEFournierAASisitskyT,et al.The economic burden of adults with major depressive disorder in the United States (2005 and 2010). J Clin Psychiatry2015; 76: 155–162.
5.
VosTHabyMMBarendregtJJ,et al.The burden of major depression avoidable by longer-term treatment strategies. Arch Gen Psychiatry2004; 61: 1097–1103.
6.
MitchellAJYadegarfarMGillJ,et al.Case finding and screening clinical utility of the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9 and PHQ-2) for depression in primary care: a diagnostic meta-analysis of 40 studies. BJPsych Open2016; 2: 127–138.
7.
ScottKMde JongePSteinDJ,et al.Mental disorders around the world: facts and figures from the WHO world mental health surveys. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2018. 1–384 p.
8.
AndrewsGIssakidisCSandersonK,et al.Utilising survey data to inform public policy: comparison of the cost-effectiveness of treatment of ten mental disorders. Br J Psychiatry2004; 184: 526–533.
9.
ChisholmDSandersonKAyuso-MateosJL,et al.Reducing the global burden of depression: population-level analysis of intervention cost-effectiveness in 14 world regions. Br J Psychiatry2004; 184: 393–403.
10.
CuijpersPPinedaBSQueroS, et al.Psychological interventions to prevent the onset of depressive disorders: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Vol. 83, Clinical Psychology Review. Elsevier Inc.; 2021. p. 101955.
11.
van ZoonenKBuntrockCEbertDD, et al.Preventing the onset of major depressive disorder: a meta-analytic review of psychological interventions. Int J Epidemiol2014; 43: 318–329.
12.
YazdSDWheelerSAZuoA. Key risk factors affecting farmers’ mental health: A systematic review. Vol. 16, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. MDPI AG; 2019.
13.
Bundespsychotherapeutenkammer. Ein Jahr nach der Reform der Psychotherapie-Richtlinie. Wartezeiten 2018 [Internet]. 2019. Available from: https://www.bptk.de/publikationen/bptk-studie/
14.
JuddFJacksonHFraserC,et al.Understanding suicide in Australian farmers. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol2006; 41: 1–10.
15.
JacksonHJuddFKomitiA, et al.Mental health problems in rural contexts: what are the barriers to seeking help from professional providers?Aust Psychol2007; 42: 147–160.
16.
WrigleySJacksonHJuddF,et al.Role of stigma and attitudes toward help-seeking from a general practitioner for mental health problems in a rural town. Aust N Z J Psychiatry2005; 39: 514–521.
17.
HutchisonAJBreckonJD. A review of telephone coaching services for people with long-term conditions. J Telemed Telecare2011; 17: 451–458.
18.
CoughtreyAEPistrangN. The effectiveness of telephone-delivered psychological therapies for depression and anxiety: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018; 24: 65–74.
19.
LinTHeckmanTGAndersonT. The efficacy of synchronous teletherapy versus in-person therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Clin Psychol Sci Pract2021; 29; 167–178.
20.
KrzyzaniakNGreenwoodHScottAM, et al.The effectiveness of telehealth versus face-to face interventions for anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare2021.
21.
LernerDAdlerDARogersWH, et al.A randomized clinical trial of a telephone depression intervention to reduce employee presenteeism and absenteeism. Psychiatr Serv2015; 66: 570–577.
22.
SchröderSFleckensteinJWunderlichM. Effektivität eines telefonbasierten Coaching-Programms für Patienten mit einer depressiven Erkrankung. Monit Versorgungsforsch2017; 10: 65–68.
23.
ThieleckeJBuntrockCTitzlerI, et al.Clinical and cost-effectiveness of personalized tele-based coaching for farmers, foresters and gardeners to prevent depression: study protocol of an 18–month follow-up pragmatic randomized controlled trial (TEC-A). Front Psychiatry2020; 11.
24.
FreundJTitzlerIThieleckeJ, et al.Implementing internet- and tele-based interventions to prevent mental health disorders in farmers, foresters and gardeners (ImplementIT): study protocol for the multi-level evaluation of a nationwide project. BMC Psychiatry2020; 20: 424.
25.
TerhorstYBraunLTitzlerI, et al.Clinical and cost-effectiveness of a guided internet-based acceptance and commitment therapy to improve chronic pain–related disability in green professions (PACT-A): study protocol of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open2020; 10: e034271.
26.
BraunLTitzlerIEbertDD, et al.Clinical and cost-effectiveness of guided internet-based interventions in the indicated prevention of depression in green professions (PROD-A): study protocol of a 36-month follow-up pragmatic randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry2019; 19: 278.
27.
BouwmansCDe JongKTimmanR, et al.Feasibility, reliability and validity of a questionnaire on healthcare consumption and productivity loss in patients with a psychiatric disorder (TiC-P). BMC Health Serv Res2013; 13: 127.
28.
Hakkaart-van RoijenLStratenADonkerM,et al.Manual trimbos/iMTA questionnaire for costs associated with psychiatric illness (TIC-P). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Erasmus University2002.
29.
RushAJTrivediMHIbrahimHM, et al.The 16-item quick inventory of depressive symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biol Psychiatry2003; 54: 573–583.
30.
TavakolMDennickR. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ2011; 2: 53–55.
31.
AuerbachRPMortierPBruffaertsR, et al.WHO World Mental Health Surveys International College student project: prevalence and distribution of mental disorders. J Abnorm Psychol2018; 127: 623–638.
32.
LamoureuxBELinardatosEFrescoDM,et al.Using the QIDS-SR16 to identify Major depressive disorder in primary care medical patients. Behav Ther2010;41: 423–431.
33.
ReisDLehrDHeberE,et al.The German version of the perceived stress scale (PSS-10): evaluation of dimensionality, validity, and measurement invariance with exploratory and confirmatory bifactor modeling. Assessment2019;26: 1246–1259.
34.
BastienCHVallièresAMorinCM. Validation of the insomnia severity index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Med2001; 2: 297–307.
35.
GierkBKohlmannSKroenkeK, et al.The Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8): a brief measure of somatic symptom burden. JAMA Intern Med2014;174: 399–407.
36.
LöweBDeckerOMüllerS, et al.Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Med Care2008: 46: 266–274.
37.
SpitzerRLKroenkeKWilliamsJBW,et al.A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med2006;106: 1092–1097.
38.
BandelowB. Assessing the efficacy of treatments for panic disorder and agoraphobia. II. The panic and agoraphobia scale. Int Clin Psychopharmacol1995;10: 83–93.
39.
BushKKivlahanDRMcDonellMB,et al.The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Arch Intern Med1998;158: 1789–1795.
40.
RichardsonJIezziAKhanMA,et al.Validity and reliability of the assessment of quality of life (AQoL)-8D multi-attribute utility instrument. Patient2014; 7: 85–96.
41.
MittagORaspeH. Eine kurze Skala zur Messung der subjektiven Prognose der Erwerbstätigkeit: Ergebnisse einer Untersuchung an 4279 Mitgliedern der gesetzlichen Arbeiterrentenversicherung zu Reliabilität (Guttman-Skalierung) und Validität der Skala. Rehabilitation2003; 42: 169–174.
42.
CillienPFischbachAMörsdorfA,et al.Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey German Version 1.0 (MBI-GS-D V1.0.). 2006.
43.
MaslachCJacksonSELeiterMP. Maslach Burnout Inventory: Third edition. Evaluating stress: A book of resources. 1997.
44.
AttkissonCCZwickR. The client satisfaction questionnaire. Eval Program Plann1982; 5: 233–237.
45.
BoßLLehrDSchaubMP, et al.Efficacy of a web-based intervention with and without guidance for employees with risky drinking: results of a three-arm randomized controlled trial. Addiction2018; 113: 635–646.
46.
SchmidtJWittmannWW. Fragebogen zur Messung der Patientenzufriedenheit. In: BrählerESchumacherJStraussB (eds) Diagnostische Verfahren in der Psychotherapie. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe, 2002, 392–396.
47.
MunderTWilmersFLeonhartR,et al.Working alliance inventory-short revised (WAI-SR): psychometric properties in outpatients and inpatients. Clin Psychol Psychother2010;17(3):231–239.
48.
LadwigIRiefWNestoriucY. What are the risks and side effects of psychotherapy? – development of an inventory for the assessment of negative effects of psychotherapy (INEP). Verhaltenstherapie2014;24: 252–263.
ZwarensteinMTreweekSGagnierJJ, et al.Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. Br Med J2008; 337: a2390.
51.
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (version 4.1.0) [Internet]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. Available from: http://www.r-project.org/
52.
van BuurenSGroothuis-OudshoornK. Mice: multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. J Stat Softw2011; 45.
53.
GrahamJWOlchowskiAEGilreathTD. How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prev Sci2007; 8: 206–213.
54.
RubinDB. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Rubin DB, editor. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1987. 258 p. (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics).
55.
RubinDB. Multiple imputation after 18+ years. J Am Stat Assoc1996; 91: 473–489.
56.
FreemanPRHedges LVOlkinI. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York, USA: Biometrics, 1986.
57.
JacobsonNSTruaxP. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol1991;59: 12–19.
58.
BenderR. Calculating confidence intervals for the number needed to treat. Control Clin Trials2001; 22: 102–110.
59.
KraemerHCKupferDJ. Size of treatment effects and their importance to clinical research and practice. Biol Psychiatry2006; 59: 990–996.
60.
ReinsJABuntrockCZimmermannJ, et al.Efficacy and moderators of internet-based interventions in adults with subthreshold depression: an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychother Psychosom2021; 90: 94–106.
61.
BraunLTitzlerITerhorstY, et al.Effectiveness of guided internet-based interventions in the indicated prevention of depression in green professions (PROD-A): results of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. J Affect Disord2021; 278: 658–671.
62.
DejongheLALBeckerJFroboeseI,et al.Long-term effectiveness of health coaching in rehabilitation and prevention: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns2017;100: 1643–1653.
63.
CuijpersPHuibersMDaniel EbertD,et al.How much psychotherapy is needed to treat depression? A metaregression analysis. J Affect Disord2013; 149: 1–13.
64.
DonkerTGriffithsKMCuijpersP,et al.Psychoeducation for depression, anxiety and psychological distress: a meta-analysis. BMC Med2009; 7.
65.
WeinerJPBandeianSHatefE,et al.In-person and telehealth ambulatory contacts and costs in a large US insured cohort before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open2021; 4: 1–13.
66.
ZhuDPaigeSRSloneH, et al.Exploring telemental health practice before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. J Telemed Telecare2021:1357633X211025943.
67.
SmithACThomasESnoswellCL, et al.Telehealth for global emergencies: implications for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J Telemed Telecare2020; 26: 309–313.
68.
MontoyaMIKoganCSRebelloTJ, et al.An international survey examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on telehealth use among mental health professionals. J Psychiatr Res2022; 148: 188–196.
69.
JuanNVSShahPSchliefM, et al.Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a co-produced framework analysis. PLoS One2021; 16: 1–21.
70.
AbrahamAJitheshADoraiswamyS,et al.Telemental health use in the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review and evidence gap mapping. Front Psychiatry2021; 12: 1–16.
71.
ThomasEEHaydonHMMehrotraA, et al.Building on the momentum: sustaining telehealth beyond COVID-19. J Telemed Telecare2020; 28: 301–308.
72.
GiacaloneAMarinLFebbiM, et al.Ehealth, telehealth, and telemedicine in the management of the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: lessons learned and future perspectives. World J Clin Cases2022; 10: 2363–2368.
73.
MyersCR. Using telehealth to remediate rural mental health and healthcare disparities. Issues Ment Health Nurs2019; 40: 233–239.
74.
JennettPAAffleck HallLHaileyD, et al.The socio-economic impact of telehealth: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare2003; 9: 311–320.
75.
MahttaDDaherMLeeMT,et al.Promise and perils of telehealth in the current era. Curr Cardiol Rep2021; 23: 1–6.
76.
CarneiroACde PinhoGSBeloJV, et al.Outcomes of telemedicine care during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience from an intervention program designed for vulnerable population in Brazil. J Telemed Telecare2022. 1357633X2210891.
77.
ZhangDShiLHanX, et al.Disparities in telehealth utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from a nationally representative survey in the United States. J Telemed Telecare2021: 1357633X211051677.
78.
Rozental A, Andersson G, Boettcher J, Ebert DD, Cuijpers P, Knaevelsrud C, Ljótsson B, Kaldo V, Titov N, & Carlbring P. Consensus statement on defining and measuring negative effects of Internet interventions. Internet Interventions 2014; 1: 12–19.
79.
DelgadilloJMcMillanDLucockM,et al.Early changes, attrition, and dose-response in low intensity psychological interventions. Br J Clin Psychol2014; 53: 114–130.
80.
MohrDCHoJDuffecyJ, et al.Effect of telephone-administered vs face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy on adherence to therapy and depression outcomes among primary care patients: a randomized trial. JAMA2012; 307: 2278–2285.
81.
HillBHonsBRichardsonB,et al.Do we know how to design effective health coaching interventions: a systematic review of the state of the literature. Am J Health Promot. 2015; 29: 158–169.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
