Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Introduction

Home-based telebehavioural healthcare improves access to mental health care for patients restricted by travel burden. However, there is limited evidence assessing the economic value of home-based telebehavioural health care compared to in-person care. We sought to compare the economic impact of home-based telebehavioural health care and in-person care for depression among current and former US service members.

Methods

We performed trial-based cost-minimisation and cost-utility analyses to assess the economic impact of home-based telebehavioural health care versus in-person behavioural care for depression. Our analyses focused on the payer perspective (Department of Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs) at three months. We also performed a scenario analysis where all patients possessed video-conferencing technology that was approved by these agencies. The cost-utility analysis evaluated the impact of different depression categories on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model assumptions.

Results

In the base case analysis the total direct cost of home-based telebehavioural health care was higher than in-person care (US$71,974 versus US$20,322). Assuming that patients possessed government-approved video-conferencing technology, home-based telebehavioural health care was less costly compared to in-person care (US$19,177 versus US$20,322). In one-way sensitivity analyses, the proportion of patients possessing personal computers was a major driver of direct costs. In the cost-utility analysis, home-based telebehavioural health care was dominant when patients possessed video-conferencing technology. Results from probabilistic sensitivity analyses did not differ substantially from base case results.

Discussion

Home-based telebehavioural health care is dependent on the cost of supplying video-conferencing technology to patients but offers the opportunity to increase access to care. Health-care policies centred on implementation of home-based telebehavioural health care should ensure that these technologies are able to be successfully deployed on patients’ existing technology.

Keywords

Cost analysis cost minimisation ehealth home telecare telecare

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Syed

Gerber

Sharp

. Traveling towards disease: Transportation barriers to health care access. J Community Health 2013; 38: 976–93.

Wallace

Weeks

Wang

et al.

Rural and urban disparities in health-related quality of life among veterans with psychiatric disorders. Psychiatr Serv Wash DC 2006; 57: 851–856.

Hudnall

. Clinical applications of telehealth in mental health care. Prof Psychol Res Pract 1998; 29: 536–542.

Fatehi

Armfield

Dimitrijevic

et al.

Clinical applications of videoconferencing: A scoping review of the literature for the period 2002–2012. J Telemed Telecare 2014; 20: 377–383.

Shore

Goranson

Ward

et al.

Meeting veterans where they’re @: A VA home-based telemental health (HBTMH) pilot program. Int J Psychiatry Med 2014; 48: 5–17.

Backhaus

Agha

Maglione

et al.

Videoconferencing psychotherapy: A systematic review. Psychol Serv 2012; 9: 111–131.

Hilty

Ferrer

Parish

et al.

The effectiveness of telemental health: A 2013 review. Telemed J E Health 2013; 19: 444–454.

Bashshur

Shannon

Bashshur

et al.

The empirical evidence for telemedicine interventions in mental disorders. Telemed J E Health 2015; 22: 87–113–87–113.

Bergmo

. Can economic evaluation in telemedicine be trusted? A systematic review of the literature. Cost Eff Resour Alloc CE 2009; 7: 18–18.

10.

Bergmo

. Economic evaluation in telemedicine – still room for improvement. J Telemed Telecare 2010; 16: 229–231.

11.

Bergmo

. Using QALYs in telehealth evaluations: A systematic review of methodology and transparency. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14: 332–332.

12.

Luxton

Pruitt

O’Brien

et al.

Design and methodology of a randomized clinical trial of home-based telemental health treatment for U.S. military personnel and veterans with depression. Contemp Clin Trials 2014; 38: 134–144.

13.

Lejuez

Hopko

Acierno

et al.

Ten year revision of the brief behavioral activation treatment for depression: Revised treatment manual. Behav Modif 2011; 35: 111–161.

14.

First

Spitzer

Miriam

et al.

Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders, research version, patient edition. SCID-I/P, New York: Biometrics Research: New York State Psychiatric Institute, 2002.

15.

Office of Personnel Management. Pay and leave: Salaries and wages, https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/2016/general-schedule-gs-salary-calculator/ (2016, accessed 11 September 2016).

16.

US Bureau of Labor Statistics. National occupational employment and wage estimates, www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm (May 2014, accessed 21 December 2015).

17.

Transportation Cooperative Research Program. Report 164: Community tools to improve transportation options for veterans, military service members, and their families, Washington DC: Federal Transit Administration, 2013.

18.

Russo

McCool

Davies

. VA telemedicine: An analysis of cost and time savings. Telemed J E Health 2016; 22: 209–215.

19.

Luxton

Pruitt

O’Brien

et al.

An evaluation of the feasibility and safety of a home-based telemental health treatment for posttraumatic stress in the U.S. military. Telemed J E-Health 2015; 21: 880–886–880–886.

20.

Gold

Siegel

Russell

et al.

Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine, New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.

21.

Beck

Steer

Brown

. Beck Depression Inventory, 2nd ed. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, 1996.

22.

Turner

Campbell

Peters

et al.

A comparison of four different approaches to measuring health utility in depressed patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013; 11: 81–81.

23.

SMART

Workgroup

. Model policy for the appropriate use of telemedicine technologies in the practice of medicine, Washington DC: Federation of State Medical Boards, 2014.

24.

Federal Communications Committee. 2015 Broadband Progress Report (FCC-15-10), https://www.fcc.gov/reports-research/reports/broadband-progress-reports/2015-broadband-progress-report (2015, accessed 4 August 2016).

25.

Salisbury

O’Cathain

Edwards

et al.

Effectiveness of an integrated telehealth service for patients with depression: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention. Lancet Psychiatry 2016; 3: 515–525–515–525.

26.

Fortney

Pyne

Edlund

et al.

A randomized trial of telemedicine-based collaborative care for depression. J Gen Intern Med 2007; 22: 1086–1093.

27.

VA Office of the Inspector General. Veterans Health administration: Audit of the beneficiary travel program. Number: 11-00336-292. Washington, DC: Office of Audits and Evaluations, 2013.

28.

Rubin

. Inference and missing data. Biometrika 1976; 63: 581–592.

Economic evaluation of home-based telebehavioural health care compared to in-person treatment delivery for depression

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Discussion

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References